The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Keeping Score for All: The Effects of Inclusion and Accommodation Policies on Large-Scale Educational Assessments
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
Anderson, M., Liu, K., Swierzbin, B., Thurlow, M., and Bielinski, J. (2000). Bilingual accommodations for limited English proficient students on statewide reading tests: Phase 2. (Minnesota Report No. 31). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Education Outcomes.
Bachman, L.F. (2002a). Alternative interpretations of alternative assessments: Some validity issues in educational performance assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice,21(3), 5-18.
Bachman, L.F. (2002b). Some reflections on task-based language performance assessment. Language Testing,19(4), 453-476.
Bachman, L.F. (in press). Statistical analyses for language assessment. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Bachman, L.F., and Palmer, A.S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Braun, H., Ragosta, M., and Kaplan, B. (1986). The predictive validity of the Scholastic Aptitude Test for disabled students. (Research Report 86-38). New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
Brown, P.J., and Augustine, A. (2001). Screen reading software as an assessment accommodation: Implications for instruction and student performance. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 10-14, Seattle, WA.
Cahalan, C., Mandinach, E., and Camara, W. (2002). Predictive validity of SAT I: Reasoning test for test takers with learning disabilities and extended time accommodations. (College Board Research Report RR 2002-05). New York: College Board.
Camara, W., Copeland, T., and Rothchild, B. (1998). Effects of extended time on the SAT I: Reasoning Test: Score growth for students with learning disabilities. (College Board Research Report 98-7). New York: College Board.
Cardinet, J., Tournier, Y., and Allal, L. (1976). The symmetry of generalizability theory: Applications to educational measurement. Journal of Educational Measurement,13, 119-135.
Castellon-Wellington, M. (1999). The impact of preference for accommodations: The performance of English language learners on large-scale academic achievement tests. (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 524). Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Evaluation, Graduate School of Education and Information Studies, University of California.
Chiu, C.W.T., and Pearson, P.D. (1999). Synthesizing the effects of test accommodations for special education and limited English proficient students. Paper presented at the National Conference on Large Scale Assessment, June 13-16, Snowbird, UT.
Council of Chief State School Officers. (2002). Annual survey of state student assessment programs 2000-2001: Summary report. Washington DC: Author.
DeVito, P.J. (1996). Issues relating to the future of National Assessment of Educational Progress: The state perspective. Unpublished paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April.
Dunbar, S., Koretz, D., and Hoover, H.D. (1991). Quality control in the development and use of performance assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 4(4), 289-303.
Duràn, R. (2001). NAEP assessment of English language learners. Paper prepared for Workshop on Reporting Test Results for Accommodated Test Examinees: Policy Measurement and Score Use Considerations, November 28, Washington, DC.
Education Week. (2004). Quality counts 2004: Count me in: Special education in an era of standards. 23(17) January 8.