Runyan, M.K. (1991). The effect of extra time on reading comprehension scores for university students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 104-108.

Schulte, A.A., Elliott, S.N., and Kratochwill, T.R. (2001). Effects of testing accommodations on standardized mathematics test scores: An experimental analysis of the performances of students with and without disabilities. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Shavelson, R.J., Baxter, G.P., and Gao, X. (1993). Sampling variability of performance assessments. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30, 215-232.

Shepard, L., Taylor, G., and Betebenner, D. (1998). Inclusion of limited-English-proficient students in Rhode Island’s grade 4 mathematics performance assessment. Los Angeles: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation/National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.

Sireci, S., Li, S., and Scarpati, S. (2003). The effects of test accommodation on test performance: A review of the literature. (Center for Educational Assessment Research Report no. 485). Amherst, MA: School of Education, University of Massachusetts.

Solano-Flores, G., and Trumbull, E. (2003). Examining language in context: The need for new research and practice paradigms in the testing of English-language learners. Educational Researcher, 32(2), 3-13.

Taylor, C. (1997). The effect of school expenditure on the achievement of high school students: Evidence from NELS and the CCD. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association annual meeting, April, Chicago.

Taylor, W. (2002). Analysis of provisions of ESEA relating to assessment. Paper prepared for March 22 meeting of the Board on Testing and Assessment, Washington, DC.

Thompson, S., Blount, A., and Thurlow, M. (2002). A summary of research on the effects of test accommodations: 1999 through 2001 (Technical Report 34). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Available: [January 2003].

Thurlow, M.L., Elliott, J.L., and Ysseldyke, J.E. (2002). Testing students with disabilities: Practical strategies for complying with district and state requirements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Thurlow, M.L., Wiley, H.I., and Bielinski, J. (2002). Biennial performance reports: 2000-2001 state assessment data . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

Tindal, G., and Fuchs, L. (2000) A summary of research on test changes: An empirical basis for defining accommodations. Lexington: University of Kentucky, Mid-South Regional Resource Center Interdisciplinary Human Development Institute.

Tindal, G., Anderson, L., Helwig, R., Miller, S., and Glasgow, A. (1998). Accommodating students with learning disabilities on math tests using language simplification. Exceptional Children, 64(4), 439-450.

Tindal, G., Heath, B., Hollenbeck, K., Almond, P., and Harniss, M. (1998). Accommodating students with disabilities on large-scale tests: An experimental study, Exceptional Children, 64(4), 439-450.

Toulmin, S.E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

U.S. Department of Education. (2002). 24th annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. Department of Education National Center for Education Statistics. (1997). The inclusion of students with disabilities and limited English proficient students in large-scale assessments: A summary of recent progress. (NCES 97-482). Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. Department of Education National Center for Education Statistics and Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (2001). The NAEP 1998 technical report. (NCES 2001-509). Washington, DC: Author.

The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement