National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$36.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Keeping Score for All: The Effects of Inclusion and Accommodation Policies on Large-Scale Educational Assessment (2004)
Board on Testing and Assessment (BOTA)

Citation Manager

. "References." Keeping Score for All: The Effects of Inclusion and Accommodation Policies on Large-Scale Educational Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2004.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
132
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Keeping Score for All: The Effects of Inclusion and Accommodation Policies on Large-Scale Educational Assessments

U.S. Department of Education National Center for Education Statistics and Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (2003). NAEP 2003 assessment administrator manual. Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. Department of Education National Center for Education Statistics and Institute of Education Sciences. (2003). The nation’s report card: Reading 2002. (NCES 2003-521). Washington, DC: Author.


Walz, L., Albus, D., Thompson, S., and Thurlow, M. (2000). Effect of a multiple day test accommodation on the performance of special education students. (NCEO Report 34). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

Weston, T.J. (2002). The validity of oral accommodation in testing. (NCES 200306). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Wightman, L.F. (1993). Test takers with disabilities: A summary of data from special administrations of the LSAT. (LSAC Research Report 93-03). Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Council.

Willingham, W.W., Ragosta, M., Bennett, R.E., Braun, H., Rock, D.A., and Powers, D.E. (1988). Testing handicapped people. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.


Zehr, M.A. (2004). Paige softens rules on English-language learners. Education Week, 23(24), 25.

Zettel, J. (1982). Implementing the right to a free appropriate public education. In Special education in America: Its legal and governmental foundations, J. Ballard, B. Ramirez and F. Weintraub, editors. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.

Ziomek, R.L., and Andrews, K.M. (1996). Predicting the college grade point averages of special-tested students from their ACT assessment scores and high school grades. (ACT Research Report 96-7). Iowa City, IA: ACT.

Ziomek, R.L., and Andrews, K.M. (1998). ACT Assessment score gains of special-tested students who tested at least twice. (Report No. ACT-RR-98-8). Iowa City, IA: ACT.

Zurcher, R., and Bryant, D.P. (2001). The validity and comparability of entrance examination scores after accommodations are made for students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(5), 462-471.

Zuriff, G.E. (2000). Extra examination time for students with learning disabilities: An examination of the maximum potential thesis. Applied Measurement in Education, 13(1), 99-117.

Zwick, R. (2002). Fair game? The use of standardized admissions tests in higher education. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

Page
132