References

Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature. (1987). A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Annals of Internal Medicine, 106(4), 598-604.

American Anthropological Association. (2004). American Anthropological Association statement on ethnography and Institutional Review Boards. [Adopted by AAA Executive Board June 4] . Arlington, VA: Author. Available: http://www.aaanet.org/stmts/irb.htm [Retrieved November 2004].

American Sociological Association. (1999). Code of ethics and policies and procedures of the ASA Committee on Professional Ethics. Washington, DC: Author.


Borman, W.C. (1979). Format and training effects on rating accuracy and rater errors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 410-421.

Bradburn, N. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on Understanding and Promoting Knowledge Accumulation in Education: Tools and Strategies for Education Research, June 30, Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/Remarks%20by%20Norman%20Bradburn.html.


Carnine, D. (2000). Why education experts resist effective practices (and what it would take to make education more like medicine). Available: http://www.edexcellence.net/doc/carnine.pdf/ [Retrieved July 29, 2004].

Chubin, D.E., and Hackett, E.J. (1990). Peerless science: Peer review and U.S. science policy. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Cicchetti, D.V. (1991). The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 119-186.

Cicchetti, D.V. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on Peer Review of Education Research Grant Applications, February 26 , Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/Cicchetti_remarks.html.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 81
Advancing Scientific Research in Education References Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature. (1987). A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Annals of Internal Medicine, 106(4), 598-604. American Anthropological Association. (2004). American Anthropological Association statement on ethnography and Institutional Review Boards. [Adopted by AAA Executive Board June 4] . Arlington, VA: Author. Available: http://www.aaanet.org/stmts/irb.htm [Retrieved November 2004]. American Sociological Association. (1999). Code of ethics and policies and procedures of the ASA Committee on Professional Ethics. Washington, DC: Author. Borman, W.C. (1979). Format and training effects on rating accuracy and rater errors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 410-421. Bradburn, N. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on Understanding and Promoting Knowledge Accumulation in Education: Tools and Strategies for Education Research, June 30, Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/Remarks%20by%20Norman%20Bradburn.html. Carnine, D. (2000). Why education experts resist effective practices (and what it would take to make education more like medicine). Available: http://www.edexcellence.net/doc/carnine.pdf/ [Retrieved July 29, 2004]. Chubin, D.E., and Hackett, E.J. (1990). Peerless science: Peer review and U.S. science policy. Albany: State University of New York Press. Cicchetti, D.V. (1991). The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 119-186. Cicchetti, D.V. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on Peer Review of Education Research Grant Applications, February 26 , Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/Cicchetti_remarks.html.

OCR for page 81
Advancing Scientific Research in Education Cicchetti, D.V., and Conn, H.A. (1976). A statistical analysis of reviewer agreement and bias in evaluating medical abstracts. Yale Journal of Biological Medicine, 45, 373-383. Cohen, D. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on a National Conversation About Doctoral Programs for Future Leaders in Education Research, November 12, Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/Cohen_Remarks_Research.html. Cole, J.R., and Cole, S. (1981). Peer review in the National Science Foundation: Phase two of a study. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Coleman, J.S., Campbell, E.Q., Hobson, C.J., McPartland, J., Mood, A.M., Weinfeld, F.D., and York, R.L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Coughlin, B. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on the Role of Journals in Developing the Education Research Knowledge Base, November 11, Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/journal_standards_workshop_agenda.html. Cronbach, L.J. (with Shapiro, K.). (1982). Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Cronbach, L.J., Ambron, S.R., Dornbusch, S.M., Hess, R.D., Hornik, R.C., Phillips, D.C., Walker, D.F., and Weiner, S.S. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Daniel, H.D. (1993). Guardians of science: Fairness and reliability of peer review (translated by W.E. Russey). New York: VCH. Ehrenberg, R., and Brewer, D. (1995). Did teachers’ verbal ability and race matter in the 1960’s? Coleman Revisited. Economics of Education Review 14(1), 1-21. Ehrenberg, R., Goldhaber, D., and Brewer, D. (1995). Do teachers’ race, gender and ethnicity matter? Evidence from NELS88. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(3), 547-561. Eisenhart, M. (2002). The paradox of peer review: Admitting too much or allowing too little. Research in Science Education, 32(2), 241-255. Eisenhart, M., and Towne, L. (2003). Contestation and change in national policy on “scientifically based” education research. Education Researcher, 32(7), 31-38. Emihovich, C. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on the Role of Journals in Developing the Education Research Knowledge Base, November 11, Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/journal_standards_workshop_agenda.html. Erickson, F., and Gutierrez, K. (2002). Culture, rigor, and science in educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 21-24. Golde, C., and Walker, G. (2002). Overview of the Carnegie initiative on the doctorate. Available: www.carnegiefoundation.org/CID/CID_Overview.pdf [Retrieved July 29, 2004]. Grissmer, D. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on Understanding and Promoting Knowledge Accumulation in Education: Tools and Strategies for Education Research, June 30, Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/Remarks%20by%20David%20Grissmer.html. Gueron, J. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on Randomized Field Trials in Education: Imple-

OCR for page 81
Advancing Scientific Research in Education mentation and Implications, September 24, Washington, DC: Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/Gueron_Remarks.html. Hackett, E.J., and Chubin, D.E. (2003). Peer review for the 21st century: Applications for educational research. Paper prepared for the Workshop on Peer Review of Education Research Grant Applications, National Research Council, February 25-26, Washington, DC. Available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/Peer%20Review.html. Hancock, C. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on a National Conversation About Doctoral Programs for Future Leaders in Education Research, November 12, Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/Hancock_Remarks_Research.html. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Harnad, S. (1998). The invisible hand of peer review. Nature (November 5). Hartley, J. (1997). Improving the clarity of journal abstracts in psychology: The case for structure. Science Communication, 24(3), 366-379. Hauenstein, N.M.A. (1998). Training raters to increase the accuracy and usefulness of appraisals. In J. Smither (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice (pp. 404-444). San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Howe, K. (2004). A critique of experimentalism. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 42-61. Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Committee on the Quality of Healthcare in America. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Iyengar, S., and Greenhouse, J.B. (1988). Selection models and the file-drawer problem. Statistical Science, 3, 109-135. Kaestle, C.F. (1993) The awful reputation of education research. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 26-31. Kellam, S.G. (2000). Community and institutional partnerships for school violence prevention. In Preventing school violence (vol. 2, NCJ 180972, pp. 1-21). Plenary Papers of the 1999 Conference on Criminal Justice Research and Evaluation-Enhancing Policy and Practice Through Research. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Kemper, K.J., McCarthy P.L., and Cicchetti D.V. (1996). Improving participation and interrater agreement in scoring Ambulatory Pediatric Association abstracts. How well have we succeeded? Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 150(4), 380-383. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Labaree, D. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on a National Conversation About Doctoral Programs for Future Leaders in Education Research, November 12, Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/Labaree_Remarks_Research.html. Lagemann, E.C. (2000). An elusive science: The troubling history of education research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Levin, J.R., and O’Donnell, A.M. (1999). What to do about educational research’s credibility gaps? Issues in Education, 5(2), 177-229. Levine, F. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on a National Conversation About Doctoral Programs for

OCR for page 81
Advancing Scientific Research in Education Future Leaders in Education Research, November 12, Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/Levine_Remarks_Research.html. McKeown, M. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on the Role of Journals in Developing the Education Research Knowledge Base, November 11, Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/journal_standards_workshop_agenda.html. Mosteller, F., Nave, B., and Miech, E.J. (2004). Why we need a structured abstract in education research. Educational Researcher, 3(1), 29-34. Myers, D. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on Randomized Field Trials in Education: Implementation and Implications, September 24, Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/Myers_Durno_Remarks.html. National Research Council. (1985). Sharing research data. Committee on National Statistics. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (1999). Improving student learning: A strategic plan for education research and its utilization. Committee on a Feasibility Study for a Strategic Education Research Program. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (2000). Protecting data privacy in health services research. Committee on the Role of Institutional Review Boards in Health Services Research Data Privacy Protection, Division of Health Care Services. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research. R.J. Shavelson and L. Towne (Eds.). Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (2003a). Sharing publication-related data and materials: Responsibilities of authorship in the life sciences. Committee on the Responsibilities of Authorship in the Biological Sciences. Board on Life Sciences, Division on Earth and Life Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2003b). Strategic education research partnership. Committee on a Strategic Education Research Partnership. M.S. Donovan, A.K. Wigdor, and C.E. Snow (Eds.). Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2004a). Implementing randomized field trials in education: Report of a workshop. Committee on Research in Education. L. Towne and M. Hilton (Eds.). Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2004b). Strengthening peer review in federal agencies that support education research. Committee on Research in Education. L. Towne, J.M. Fletcher, and L. Wise (Eds.). Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Natriello, G. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on Understanding and Promoting Knowledge Accu-

OCR for page 81
Advancing Scientific Research in Education mulation in Education: Tools and Strategies for Education Research, June 30, Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/Remarks%20by%20Gary%20Natriello.html. Pulakos, E.D. (1986). The development of training programs to increase accuracy on different rating forms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38, 76-91. Raudenbush, S. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on a National Conversation About Doctoral Programs for Future Leaders in Education Research, November 12, Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/Raudenbush_Remarks_Research.html. Redish, E. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on Peer Review of Education Research Grant Applications, February 25, Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/Redish_remarks.html. Rothsein, H. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on the Role of Journals in Developing the Education Research Knowledge Base, November 11, Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/Rothstein_Remarks_Journal.html. Sackett, D.L., Richardson, W.S., Rosenberg, W., and Haynes, R.B. (Eds.). (1997). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. London: Churchill Livingstone. Schneider, B. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on Understanding and Promoting Knowledge Accumulation in Education: Tools and Strategies for Education Research, June 30, Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/Remarks%20by%20Barbara%20Schneider.html. Seastrom, M. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on Understanding and Promoting Knowledge Accumulation in Education: Tools and Strategies for Education Research, June 30, Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/Remarks%20by%20Marilyn%20Seastrom.html. Sebba, J. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on the Role of Journals in Developing the Education Research Knowledge Base, November 11, Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/Sebba_Remarks_Journal.html. Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., and Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin. Shulman, L. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on a National Conversation About Doctoral Programs for Future Leaders in Education Research, November 12, Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/Shulman_Remarks_Research.html. St. Pierre, E.A. (2002). “Science” rejects postmodernism. Educational Research, 31(8), 25-27. Tobin, J. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on a National Conversation About Doctoral Programs for Future Leaders in Education Research, November 12, Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/Tobin_Remarks_Research.html.

OCR for page 81
Advancing Scientific Research in Education Towne, L. (in press). Scientific evidence and inference in educational policy and practice: Defining and implementing “scientifically based research.” In C. Dwyer (Ed.), Measurement and research in the accountability era. Orinda, CA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Strategic plan 2002-2007. Washington, DC: Author. Available: http://www.ed.gov/about/reports/strat/plan2002-07/plan.pdf/ [Retrieved November 24, 2003]. U.S. Department of Education. (2004). Improving teacher quality state grants, Title II, Part A: Non-regulatory guidance. Available: http://www.ed.gov/programs/teacherqual/guidance.pdf/ [Retrieved July 13, 2004]. VandenBos, G. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on the Role of Journals in Developing the Education Research Knowledge Base, November 11, Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/journal_standards_workshop_agenda.html. Vaughn, S., and Damann, J.D. (2001). Science and sanity in special education. Behavioral Disorders, 27, 21-29. What Works Clearinghouse. (2004). Study design classification. Available: http://www.w-w-c.org/about/workpapers.html/ [Retrieved July 19, 2004]. Whitehurst, G. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on a National Conversation About Doctoral Programs for Future Leaders in Education Research, November 12, Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/Whitehurst_Remarks_Research.html. Willinsky, J. (2003). Remarks. Presented to the National Research Council Committee on Research in Education Workshop on the Role of Journals in Developing the Education Research Knowledge Base, November 11, Washington, DC. Transcript available: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/core/Willinsky_Remarks_Journal.html. Woehr, D.J., and Huffcutt, A.I. (1994). Rater training for performance appraisal: A quantitative review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 189-205. Zedeck, S., and Cascio, W.F. (1982). Performance appraisal decisions as a function of rater training and purpose of the appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 752-758.