National Academies Press: OpenBook

Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (1992)

Chapter: Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2)

« Previous: Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 1)
Suggested Citation:"Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2)." National Research Council. 1992. Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11144.
×
Page 23
Suggested Citation:"Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2)." National Research Council. 1992. Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11144.
×
Page 24
Suggested Citation:"Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2)." National Research Council. 1992. Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11144.
×
Page 25
Suggested Citation:"Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2)." National Research Council. 1992. Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11144.
×
Page 26
Suggested Citation:"Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2)." National Research Council. 1992. Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11144.
×
Page 27
Suggested Citation:"Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2)." National Research Council. 1992. Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11144.
×
Page 28
Suggested Citation:"Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2)." National Research Council. 1992. Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11144.
×
Page 29
Suggested Citation:"Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2)." National Research Council. 1992. Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11144.
×
Page 30
Suggested Citation:"Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2)." National Research Council. 1992. Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11144.
×
Page 31
Suggested Citation:"Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2)." National Research Council. 1992. Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11144.
×
Page 32
Suggested Citation:"Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2)." National Research Council. 1992. Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11144.
×
Page 33
Suggested Citation:"Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2)." National Research Council. 1992. Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11144.
×
Page 34
Suggested Citation:"Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2)." National Research Council. 1992. Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11144.
×
Page 35
Suggested Citation:"Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2)." National Research Council. 1992. Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11144.
×
Page 36
Suggested Citation:"Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2)." National Research Council. 1992. Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11144.
×
Page 37
Suggested Citation:"Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2)." National Research Council. 1992. Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11144.
×
Page 38
Suggested Citation:"Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2)." National Research Council. 1992. Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11144.
×
Page 39
Suggested Citation:"Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2)." National Research Council. 1992. Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11144.
×
Page 40
Suggested Citation:"Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2)." National Research Council. 1992. Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11144.
×
Page 41

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2) Setting Priorities for Space Research Opportunities and Imperatives 2 The U.S. Space Research Program: Accomplishments, Prospects, Lessons Space research concentrates on observations or experiments that are effective means of obtaining essential information, including studies of the Earth and its environment, solar and space physics, solar system characteristics, astronomy, life sciences, and fundamental physics. Each of these fields is in a different state of maturity: astronomy, earth sciences, planetary sciences, and space physics reach back to the very origins of the space program, whereas life sciences and microgravity sciences are just now emerging as longer missions offer increased opportunities for research. The following pages summarize briefly the accomplishments and status of U.S. space research. The summary is not meant to be exhaustive but rather to REPORT MENU provide a glimpse of what has been achieved in our space program, some ideas of NOTICE opportunities that remain, and a constructive evaluation of what we have learned MEMBERSHIP about program management. PREFACE SUMMARY CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 2 SELECTED DISCOVERIES AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF THE CHAPTER 3 U.S. SPACE RESEARCH PROGRAM CHAPTER 4 CHAPTER 5 In only 30 years, space research has brought forth a rich array of expanded knowledge and understanding in all areas of space science and applications. Major discoveries have been made as we moved outside the Earth's atmosphere, found a new view of our home planet, and left behind such features of our environment as the physiological effect of gravity. From our new vantage point, we have achieved significant understanding of many fundamental processes in the cosmos, solar system, Earth, and even our own bodies. Our constant search for origins has been aided by space observations providing new insights into the formation of the universe, the Earth, other planets, and life as we know it. Through new eyes, we see an unexpected complexity in file:///C|/SSB_old_web/prio1ch2.htm (1 of 19) [6/21/2004 10:00:45 AM]

Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2) structure and processes over a vast range of spatial scales. Closer to home, we have gained a deeper appreciation for the intricate interactions between humans and the Earth. In some areas, we have gained substantial practical applications of new knowledge and techniques. Scientific research in space has provided answers to many questions and stimulated even more. We have learned much about larger issues such as What is in our worlds? How do our worlds work? How did our worlds come to be? How do our worlds evolve? How do we affect and how are we affected by our worlds? These questions are used as organizing themes in the following brief review of the major accomplishments of the space sciences over the past 30 years. Discovery—What Is in Our Worlds? We discover the wonders of the universe by extending our senses with sophisticated instruments. In space, our instruments attain a unique perspective from which to observe the Earth below and the cosmos above. Exotic objects, such as gamma-ray bursters and braided rings, and global physical processes, such as the ubiquitous mesoscale eddies in ocean currents, were revealed by the unique capabilities of space instrumentation. New discoveries almost always stimulate new investigations that require new sensory capabilities and lead to further discovery. Complete worldwide patterns revealing the extent and variability of important features and phenomena on the Earth have been assembled. Atmospheric trace species (e.g., ozone, carbon monoxide, particulates, and many others) were sampled only at isolated locations until just a decade ago. Now with observations from space we can begin to piece together global budgets of these important chemicals. Satellites have produced images showing the location and seasonal movement of ecosystem boundaries. GEOS-3 produced the first realization of the global geoid over the oceans, and Magsat mapped the Earth's magnetic field. Landsat has contributed the first global view of geologic structures. Landsat and other Earth remote sensing satellites provide abstracted information on regions of the world that were unmapped 20 years ago. Since 1960, weather patterns have been mapped by satellites and now represent a major tool in weather forecasting and its interpretation to millions of television viewers. Mineral and oil file:///C|/SSB_old_web/prio1ch2.htm (2 of 19) [6/21/2004 10:00:45 AM]

Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2) deposits are located and mapped with the aid of Landsat and SPOT. Solar system probes have discovered new planetary bodies and unexpected phenomena throughout the solar system. The Voyager missions discovered new moons and rings around the giant planets that had not been detected from the Earth. The Voyagers also discovered active volcanism on Io, bizarre and unexpected tectonics on icy satellites, a tenuous atmosphere and massive nitrogen polar caps on Triton, tilted and shifted magnetic fields on Uranus and Neptune, and other previously undetected phenomena. These discoveries and the accompanying images from planetary explorers stimulated wide public interest in the science and exploration of space. Space is not a void, but is occupied by complex plasmas. One of the first Earth satellites discovered the Van Allen radiation belts in 1958. Continuing exploration with spacecraft revolutionized our view of the Earth's environment above 200-km altitude. We have discovered much about the molecular complexity of interstellar and circumstellar environments. We now know that there is a region above the ionosphere consisting of an electrically conducting plasma permeated by the Earth's magnetic field. It is called the magnetosphere because its structure and many of its processes are controlled by the magnetic field. We have learned that other planets possess magnetospheres and that the Sun has a magnetosphere consisting of a hot (about one million degrees Kelvin), magnetized plasma flow (the solar wind) extending beyond the orbits of the planets and filling interplanetary space, forming a distinct cavity—the heliosphere—in the nearby interstellar medium. Instruments in space have now covered almost the entire electromagnetic spectrum, prompting the discovery of new objects and new environments impossible to see in any other way. Through spacecraft surveys of the celestial sphere at X-ray, ultraviolet, and infrared wavelengths, we have cataloged more than 250,000 objects, many of which can be seen only from space. Observations from rockets and satellites revealed the first black hole candidates by detecting the intense, variable X-rays created near the event horizons of these exotic objects. The Vela satellites, designed to monitor gamma-rays from clandestine nuclear tests, quickly discovered gamma-ray bursters, objects emitting bursts of gamma-rays lasting only a few seconds, whose exact nature remains undetermined after more than a decade of study. The first infrared sky survey discovered large, solid particles in orbit around ordinary stars, presumably remnants of an earlier era of planet formation, detectable only from space-borne telescopes and suggesting that planetary systems like our own are common in the galaxy. As each new window at X-ray, gamma-ray, and infrared wavelengths opened, new phenomena appeared with characteristics difficult or impossible to sense in any other way. We have identified the earliest stages of star formation from their faint infrared emission. We know that almost every type of star, normal and extraordinary, loses mass through outflowing streams of matter at all stages of its evolution. Galaxies that emit 99 percent of their light at infrared wavelengths, quasars with strong X-ray emission, supernovae, novae, accretion disks around neutron stars, and black holes have all been discovered or studied from space. Without spacecraft file:///C|/SSB_old_web/prio1ch2.htm (3 of 19) [6/21/2004 10:00:45 AM]

Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2) bearing scientific instruments, these phenomena would remain unknown. Understanding Processes—How Do Our Worlds Work? Manifestations of physical laws in the universe occur through physical and chemical processes that transform and transfer material, energy, and momentum throughout natural systems. Spacecraft missions enable us to study processes in a number of ways impossible from the Earth's surface: by using wavelengths absorbed by the atmosphere, by investigating celestial objects and phenomena at close range or by direct sampling, and by gaining a global-scale view of terrestrial processes. In many cases, spacecraft observation aims not just at understanding how a particular process works. Rather, by examining systems not reproducible in a laboratory, (e.g., planetary rings, magnetospheres, and atmospheres), space investigations gain a deeper understanding of the underlying physical laws. The first measurements of important and cyclical phenomena on Earth have been made from space. The now famous antarctic ozone hole was observed in 1984 and confirmed by satellite imagery from Nimbus-7. With satellite measurements the spatial extent and magnitude of yearly changes were established. The yearly movements of both the antarctic and the arctic icepacks have now been tracked in a synoptic manner to reveal detailed patterns. We have also observed El Niño events, the effects of volcanoes on the stratosphere, and, even occasionally, human-caused pollution events. Tropical cyclones are now tracked from their spawning grounds to their landfall, with important consequent reduction in human disaster. The view from space has provided a fundamental advance in understanding of the structure and dynamics of the Earth system. Perhaps the most pervasive accomplishment of the space age began in 1960 with the launch of TIROS-1, the first weather satellite. The images pieced together from the first several passes of the satellite dramatically confirmed a view of atmospheric dynamics that previously had only been inferred. Now, every evening, televisions throughout the world display the latest generation of satellite imagery of global and regional weather systems. Since the launch of TIROS-1, no hurricane has touched shore without being spotted and tracked well in advance. The combination of sea surface temperature and chlorophyll fields confirmed the widespread ocean phenomenon of mesoscale eddies, changing our thinking about energy transport in the oceans. Ocean color observations, at first a curiosity recognized as useful only by fishermen, are now regarded as an excellent means to map mesoscale circulation patterns in the open ocean, especially where the temperature signal is washed out by seasonally high or low temperatures. That oceanic mesoscale features are widespread was firmly established by such measurements. Understanding plate tectonics and the tectonics of other solid planets has revolutionized the study of the solid Earth. Space-borne measurements have contributed most spectacularly by establishing the rate at which plates move with file:///C|/SSB_old_web/prio1ch2.htm (4 of 19) [6/21/2004 10:00:45 AM]

Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2) respect to each other on the time scale of years and also by determining the geoid (the shape of the Earth's figure) with tremendously improved accuracy. The geoid relates to mass distribution in the Earth's interior and helps in showing how the Earth's mantle is convecting. Altimetry from orbit has improved understanding of both submarine topography and structure. Measurements from space have shown how the length of the Earth's day responds to wind currents on annual time scales and to interior movements on decennial scales. Precise distance measuring from space is revolutionizing the way we look at sea level variation on decennial time scales, and space-borne optical and infrared imagery has come to be essential in the study of the geology and geophysics of the continents. The first radar measurements from space show the enormous potential of that method, and magnetic measurements have established, among other things, that ultimately we can expect to monitor temporal variations in the Earth's main field from space on time scales from seconds to decades and centuries. Enormous diversity in the manifestations of physical laws and processes on other worlds has been discovered through planetary exploration. Solar system bodies are remarkably different in evolution, composition, and dynamics. Voyager encounters with the giant planets revealed intricate and unexpected complexity in the ring systems of Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. Understanding the morphology of the rings has required detailed, ongoing studies at the forefront of gravitational dynamics. Much of this work has application to larger astrophysical systems, making ring studies a testbed for understanding gravitational dynamics. Based on spacecraft observations, comparative studies of atmospheric dynamics on terrestrial and giant planets reveal a much broader range of physical conditions than those seen on the Earth, and outstanding problems remain that tax our understanding of the fluid mechanics of atmospheres. These include the maintenance of long-lived spot features on Jupiter, the origin of wind speed distribution on giant planets, and the energy balance of the Venus thermosphere. Tectonic processes occur on large and small bodies alike, and understanding both the energy sources and the origin of particular features continues to be a challenge long after they were identified by spacecraft. The thick atmosphere of Titan, discovered by Voyager, appears to hide a wealth of chemical and dynamical processes as complex as those on the Earth (including a methane "hydrological" cycle). Triton was shown by Voyager to have a surface-atmosphere nitrogen transport cycle akin to that of carbon dioxide on Mars, but with the added feature of nitrogen geysers, for which no Martian analog exists. Microgravity has pronounced effects on living systems. While plants and animals, including humans, can survive in the space environment, there are clear effects (including exposure to microgravity) that have pronounced impacts on living systems. Seeds of higher plants germinate in space, and grow at least into seedlings. Fertilized frog eggs have developed in space. Understanding Origins—How Did Our Worlds Come to Be? file:///C|/SSB_old_web/prio1ch2.htm (5 of 19) [6/21/2004 10:00:45 AM]

Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2) In the broadest sense, we seek to understand where we came from and how the natural world was formed. Questions about the origin of the universe, the formation of the solar system, and the appearance of life have been central to space research over the past three decades. The cosmic background radiation seen from space is the signature of the beginning of the universe. Cosmic background radiation is the oldest remnant of the early universe directly detected today. Its spectrum and pattern on the sky show us the most primitive state of matter and serve as the strongest constraints on our theories of how galaxies formed after the Big Bang. Between the discovery of cosmic background radiation in 1965 and 1990, observations from the ground, from aircraft, and from balloons all provided estimates of the spectrum of this very faint radiation. But the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE), launched in late 1989, measured the spectrum so accurately that it disproved a few key results from the previous 10 years, and several hundred theoretical papers became meaningless. Midway through its mission at the time of this writing, COBE has already revolutionized our understanding of the early universe and promises the greatest refinement to our knowledge of the cosmic background since its discovery 25 years ago. Solar system exploration revealed intricate links between the physical and chemical record of planetary bodies and the large-scale processes of star and planet formation. Detailed Pioneer and Voyager studies of the outer system have shown that Jupiter and Saturn contain cores of elements heavier than hydrogen and helium, while Uranus and Neptune appear to be made of such cores with a veneer of hydrogen and helium. It is now recognized that the formation of these planets required accretion of ice and rock cores before gas was added. This is distinctly different from the formation of stars and constrains the evolution of the protoplanetary disk in a number of intriguing ways. The volatile composition of outer solar system bodies, including comets, is now just beginning to be elucidated and has a number of significant differences from the composition of environments in giant molecular clouds. With such a record, it is becoming possible to piece together a history of grain material from such clouds, through infall into the protoplanetary nebula and accretion into solar system bodies. Further missions to investigate in situ the less-evolved bodies of the solar system should clarify the history of the material that eventually formed the planets and allow us to characterize the formation of the solar system as a part of star formation and galactic chemical evolution. Study of the gravito-electrodynamics in "dusty plasmas" discovered in Saturn's rings provided insight into the formation and evolution of the solar system. Observations of spokes in Saturn's rings by Voyager highlighted the effect of electromagnetic forces on charged dust particles. In a similar way, the interaction of dust and plasmas in comets is believed to be a central element in understanding the formation of comet tails. Such observations have given rise to the study of gravito-electrodynamics in dust plasmas, which has important applications to the understanding of the formation and evolution of the solar system. file:///C|/SSB_old_web/prio1ch2.htm (6 of 19) [6/21/2004 10:00:45 AM]

Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2) The search for life on Mars is of continuing scientific interest. While signs of life were not found at the sample areas, evidence from Viking for past climate change on Mars shifts the issue to whether life formed on Mars sometime in the past and whether it exists in selected niches today. The answers to these questions are of fundamental importance, since on the Earth the evidence is strong that life heavily modified the Earth's environment in favor of continued habitability. If life actually formed there, why did this not occur on Mars? Understanding Change—How Do Our Worlds Evolve? Scientific events often remind us that few things are constant. The universe evolved from some primordial event or juncture and continues to evolve. Stars are born and die. Our Sun changes both gradually and cyclically. Planets develop climates, and then those climates change. We know from geologic records that the Earth has changed and continues to change. Some changes can be seen only from space by observations in new spectral ranges, by visiting our neighbors in the solar system, and by viewing our w planet from the vantage point of Earth orbit. Satellites now routinely document the extent of some major changes in the planet Earth. Images from space document continuing change of the Earth's surface. The expansion of arid regions (desertification) is now tracked in several regions almost exclusively by satellite. Retreats of glaciers, deforestation and natural movements of forest edges, and even changes in habitat are now tracked from satellites in some locations. Space geodesy provides measurements of continental drift and changes in sea level. Climate change on the terrestrial planets Venus and Mars is profound on long and short time scales. Mariner 9 and Viking orbiters and landers have revealed the complexities of the Martian environment, with intricate weather patterns on diurnal and seasonal time scales distinct from those of the Earth. The absence of oceans and the presence of seasonal polar caps with which the atmosphere is in equilibrium provide a different physical system in which to test our understanding of climate from local to global scales. Viking and Mariner data detected seasonal and permanent polar cap composition, pressure variations at two ground sites, water vapor distribution, growth and decay of dust storms, and the presence of dust devils and mesoscale cyclonic storm systems. Evidence for an earlier, warmer climate on Mars based on Viking images of apparent river channels and glacial and lake deposits is even more profound. The evolutionary sequence leading from the warmer, wetter past climate to the present cold, dry climate is an outstanding issue raised by spacecraft exploration of Mars. The climate of Venus varies on the short term, as revealed by Pioneer Venus ultraviolet data showing a decrease in sulfur dioxide abundance in the stratosphere. The high surface temperatures on Venus, established firmly by spacecraft, constitute a dramatic demonstration of greenhouse warming. Magellan images indicate that Venus has had a violent, volcanically active history, the climatic implications of which have just begun to be assessed. file:///C|/SSB_old_web/prio1ch2.htm (7 of 19) [6/21/2004 10:00:45 AM]

Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2) The solar energy flux is not constant, but varies with time. Using knowledge gained over the past 30 years, we can now identify some of the physical mechanisms linking the Sun to the near-Earth environment. Motions in the convective layers of the Sun are believed to generate the magnetic field and solar wind variations; these in turn affect the Earth's magnetosphere and regulate the amount of plasma energy incident on the Earth's polar caps. Current research suggests that small percentage changes (about 0.5 percent) in the total energy output of the Sun (the solar constant) may influence short-term terrestrial climate. The Earth and its space environment contain coupled phenomena that must be studied as part of a system including the Sun and its plasma environment along with the Earth's magnetosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and biota. Understanding Human Interaction—How Do We Affect and How Are We Affected by Our Worlds? Space research is increasingly concerned with human activities. Information from Earth-observing satellites documents how human activities, including agriculture, forestation and deforestation, and the use of fossil fuels, are changing the Earth's surface and the planetary environment. Such information is used in a variety of applications to guide our activities. Spaceflight exposes humans to an unfamiliar environment with weightlessness and the threat of lethal streams of radiation, thus raising questions about human physiology that must be addressed to ensure safe, long-duration spaceflight. Satellite observations are important for following some human impacts on the planet and are materially aiding many human endeavors. The first nighttime picture of city lights provided from the Defense Military Satellite Program (DMSP) was a stunning image. More recently, leaders of several developing countries have been convinced by satellite imagery to control deforestation in tropical rain forests. In general, it is possible to track land use patterns on regional scales simply and easily with data from operational satellites. Even day-to-day logistical operations are aided by both Landsat and the Global- Positioning System (GPS), as dramatically demonstrated in Desert Storm operations in 1990-1991. People can live and work in microgravity for periods at least as long as one year and can then return to the Earth and readapt to gravity. Perhaps the most striking accomplishment of the U.S. space program is the discovery that humans can work in space and on another body in the solar system and can travel to another part of our solar system and return successfully. Experience gained by the Soviets using their space station MIR has proven that humans can survive for up to one year in space and successfully adapt to 1 g upon return to the Earth. Such demonstrations have opened the way for human exploration beyond the Earth for centuries to come. Prior to the spaceflight of higher mammals, physiologists did not know file:///C|/SSB_old_web/prio1ch2.htm (8 of 19) [6/21/2004 10:00:45 AM]

Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2) whether humans could survive for a significant period in a gravity-free environment. In microgravity, essentially all physiological systems are perturbed. Some systems, such as the bone and muscle, vestibular, and cardiovascular systems, are affected more than others, such as the gastrointestinal and urinary systems. Some systems, including the vestibular, adapt in a few days, whereas bone resorption continues at least for months and perhaps indefinitely. Space plasmas can have a profound and sometimes disastrous effect on spacecraft and humans. It is well established that many spacecraft systems and subsystems exhibit anomalies, or even failures, under the influence of magnetospheric substorms, geomagnetic storms, and solar flares. Processes such as spacecraft charging and "single-event upsets" (due to highly ionizing energetic particles) in processor memories make the day-today operation of space systems difficult. Radiation from these events could be fatal to humans if adequate protection is not provided. PROSPECTS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR SPACE RESEARCH Almost every field touched by space science has planned missions or long- term opportunities promising major advances in our scientific knowledge of the universe near and far. The major missions have been thoroughly reviewed and refined. And the flow of novel ideas and proposals for small projects in unexplored areas continues as the scientific achievements of the last three decades stimulate new questions. The following is a representative list and brief description of the myriad of missions and initiatives that are under discussion or planned for launch. The list is not exhaustive but illustrative of the many exciting opportunities that exist. Earth Observing System (EOS). The EOS will make a range of contributions to the scientific questions outlined in the federal Global Change Research Program. For some key questions, such as the role of clouds in the planetary radiation budget and in the global hydrologic cycle, EOS will provide information essential to rapid advancement in understanding the planet. In other areas, like the Earth's history, EOS will supplement information largely derived from surface measurements (e.g., sequencing of landforms). In all, EOS is the centerpiece of the measurement program for global change research. Instruments proven for scientific purposes on EOS will be the next generation of operational sensors to monitor our weather, land use, and changing environment.l Specialized spaceflights for measuring earth processes—Earth Probes. Not all of the important variables will be measured from EOS. A number of special initiatives are planned as Earth Probes. These include Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), the best hope for quantitative measurements of soil moisture and vegetative mass; the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM); the Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-View Sensor (SeaWIFS), for studying oceanic biomass and mesoscale circulation features; a scatterometer to investigate global wind fields over the ocean; and new magnetic and gravity measurements. file:///C|/SSB_old_web/prio1ch2.htm (9 of 19) [6/21/2004 10:00:45 AM]

Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2) Geosynchronous platforms for Mission to Planet Earth. These satellites will provide continuing detailed observations of a number of variables in mid-latitude with temporal resolution of minutes (versus days). They will contribute to studies of atmospheric dynamics, oceanic dynamics, atmospheric structure, water vapor, surface features and vegetation, and many more processes. Some of these satellites will provide all-weather observations by using microwave emissions. Upper atmosphere composition and dynamics—UARS. Launched in late 1991, the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (UARS) is to measure the key constituents and key dynamic processes of the upper atmosphere on a global scale. UARS will also contribute to studies of ozone depletion. Ocean topography mission—TOPEX/Poseidon. Planned for a 1992 launch, the TOPEX/Poseidon spacecraft will resolve topography in order to measure the variable component of oceanic circulation. In due course (with a gravity mission), it will produce a quantitative measure of mean oceanic circulation. Improved operational meteorological satellites. Continuing improvements are planned for the U.S. series of weather satellites to enhance observations of the horizontal and vertical structure of the atmosphere (mainly temperature and water content) worldwide. These observations will contribute to improved forecasts of large-scale weather patterns and significant weather events affecting human activities. Operational land observatories—Landsat. Many routine remote sensing applications require continuing and consistent measurements. These have been provided by Landsat, and more recently by SPOT. Applications include mineral exploration, agriculture, and land use management. Martian climatic processes—Mars Observer. The Mars observer will provide a comprehensive remote sensing study of the surface and atmosphere, with emphasis on climate change on a variety of scales. Aeronomy of the Martian atmosphere—Mars Aeronomy Observer. The Mars Aeronomy Observer will characterize the potential fields of the upper Martian atmosphere, clarify the role of photochemistry, and study the dynamics of the ionosphere. Geophysics of the Martian surface—Mars penetrators. These missions will install a network of seismometers, weather stations, and heat flow experiments on the Martian surface and possibly perform simple geochemical analyses. Study of the Jovian System—Galileo. Galileo, now en route to Jupiter, will deploy a probe to measure directly the composition and dynamics of the Jovian atmosphere and will study in detail the satellites, atmosphere, and magnetosphere file:///C|/SSB_old_web/prio1ch2.htm (10 of 19) [6/21/2004 10:00:45 AM]

Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2) of the Jovian system. Detailed geophysical surveys of the Galilean satellites—The Jupiter Grand Tour. This nuclear electronic propulsion mission will orbit each individual Galilean satellite, providing microwave and radar sounding of the subsurface. It will deploy penetrators for surface geochemical analyses of selected satellites and provide global remote sensing for each from the main spacecraft. It will determine gravitational moments and hence the constraints on internal structure for each satellite. Origin and evolution of the outer solar system—CRAF/Cassini. Planned for launches in the late 1990s, these missions will closely observe the nucleus of a comet, deploy a probe into the atmosphere of Titan, and provide in- depth physical and chemical studies of primitive bodies, Titan, and the Saturn system. The surface atmosphere processes appear to be as rich and complex as those on Earth but without the presence of life. Neptune Orbiter and Probes—Triton penetrator and Pluto flyby—Poseidon. This spacecraft will orbit Neptune and drop a probe to sample gas abundance and atmospheric dynamics through and below the ammonium hydrosulfide cloud layer. It will perform long-term atmospheric observations from orbit. The orbiter will make repeated passes by Triton to determine surface temperature distribution, volatile transport processes, gravitational moments (for internal structure), and atmospheric composition for molecular abundances, including noble gases. A companion probe to make the first flyby of the enigmatic Pluto-Chalon system is also under study. Intensive geological and biological studies of sites on Mars—Mars Rover and Sample Return. Mars Rover is being planned to conduct detailed, on- site geological and biological investigations of portions of the Martian surface. It will search for microfossils and return selected samples to the Earth for comprehensive laboratory studies. Detailed atmospheric and surface chemical analysis for Venus—Venus Probe. The Venus Probe will determine the isotopic and chemical composition of the atmosphere, resolving ambiguities from previous experiments. It will characterize the geochemistry of uplands and plains sites on the surface. Comet Sample Return—Rosetta. Rosetta is intended to collect a sample of a comet nucleus from at least 1-meter depth, in order to understand further the ice-volatile component. The sample will be preserved and returned to the Earth for laboratory study. Global mapping of the lunar surface—Lunar Observer. The Lunar Observer will characterize the crustal composition of the Moon, place lunar samples in global context, and search for ice in the polar regions of the Moon. file:///C|/SSB_old_web/prio1ch2.htm (11 of 19) [6/21/2004 10:00:45 AM]

Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2) Composition and properties of a sample of asteroids—Multiple Asteroid Rendezvous Mission. This mission is intended to yield observations of remotely sensed asteroid surface composition as a function of heliocentric distance. Exploration of the universe through new windows—The Great Observatories. The major components of the planned astronomical satellites for the next decade are NASA's Great Observatories, four orbiting platforms for observations in different wavelength bands. The first of these, the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) now flying, was designed to improve the resolution, sensitivity, and wavelength range of ultraviolet and visual observations beyond anything available from the ground. With modifications to its camera optics to compensate for spherical aberration induced by construction errors, it should achieve this full resolution by 1993. The Advanced X-ray Astronomy Facility (AXAF) will increase the capabilities of X-ray observations by several orders of magnitude over any previously available, allowing study of accretion disks around black holes, quasars, and the diffuse X-rays from distant clusters of galaxies. The Gamma-ray Observatory (GRO) is designed to study the exotic gamma-ray bursters as well as the matter-antimatter annihilation seen toward the center of the galaxy. The Space Infrared Telescope Facility (SIRTF) will cover the entire infrared spectrum from 1 micron to almost 1 millimeter, searching for dark matter in the form of brown dwarfs, the birth of new planetary systems around young stars, and the first generation of galaxies created after the Big Bang. Other astronomical missions. A suite of other missions is equally important for exploration of emissions impossible to study from the ground. The Extreme Ultraviolet Explorer (EUVE), the X-ray Timing Explorer (XTE), and the Submillimeter Wave Astronomy satellite are three examples among many. These special-purpose satellites will further extend our capabilities by providing, for example, high spectral resolution in special bands, wide field coverage, special timing capability to detect rapid variables and accurately measure their periods, polarization properties of light, particle detectors for cosmic rays, and specialized instruments to follow up new discoveries with the Great Observatories. Suborbital observations, including the Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA) measurements from aircraft, are essential complements to the spacecraft missions. They not only provide unique capabilities, but also aid space instrument designers by allowing quick turnaround and hands-on development of novel techniques. Moon-based instruments. Multiple-telescope interferometers in Earth orbit or on the Moon promise to improve the angular resolution for visual and infrared observations by several orders of magnitude. At this time, spacecraft interferometers, both for imaging and for astrometry, represent one of the logical next steps for instrument development. It is widely believed that advances from this technique alone could revolutionize our view of the universe with resolution fine enough to image surfaces of nearby stars and probe to the event horizons of massive black holes in the nuclei of distant galaxies. International Solar-Terrestrial Physics (ISTP) Program. A constellation of several Earth-orbiting satellites will be launched during the 1990s by the United file:///C|/SSB_old_web/prio1ch2.htm (12 of 19) [6/21/2004 10:00:45 AM]

Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2) States, Japan, Europe (through the European Space Agency) and the [former] USSR. The overall scientific objective of ISTP is to develop a comprehensive, global understanding of the generation and flow of energy from the Sun, through the interplanetary medium, and into the Earth's space environment. The improved knowledge will have practical applications in understanding and forecasting radio and power interruptions from solar events. Orbiting Solar Laboratory (OSL). The OSL is intended to provide high- spatial-resolution measurements of temperatures, densities, velocities, magnetic fields, and chemical abundances in the solar atmosphere to determine the fundamental processes responsible for plasma heating and the transport of mass and energy between different levels of the solar atmosphere. Solar Probe. This spacecraft will pass through the outer regions of the Sun's corona, carrying out in situ measurements of plasma, fields, and energetic particles in the solar wind acceleration region. Imaging Super Cluster (ISC). Two spacecraft in highly elliptical polar and equatorial Earth orbits will employ photon, energetic neutral atom (ENA), and radio-wave imaging techniques to provide images of the Earth's radiation belts (Van Allen belts) and magnetotail. A cluster of four spacecraft will be actively maneuvered throughout the magnetotail to make simultaneous in situ plasma and field measurements. Ionosphere-Thermosphere-Magnetosphere Coupler (ITMC). A constellation of several Earth-orbiting satellites will investigate the physical, chemical, dynamic, radiative, and energetic processes that couple the ionosphere- thermosphere-magnetosphere system with the heliosphere and outer magnetosphere above and the stratosphere below. Mercury Orbiter (MEO). Two spacecraft with instruments to observe plasmas and fields and with solar physics and planetology experiments will fly in polar orbit around Mercury. The mission will map the magnetic structure and plasma environment of Mercury, investigate apparent substorm processes, and study the transfer of mass and energy from the solar wind. High-Energy Solar Physics (HESP) Mission. This mission will acquire high-resolution imaging and spectroscopy of high-energy radiations during solar maximum. Sub-arc-second imaging and high-resolution gamma-ray spectroscopy will provide simultaneous photospheric and coronal imaging. Long-duration human exposure to microgravity. The effects of microgravity on physiological systems that have evolved in the constant and ubiquitous presence of gravity provide rich opportunities for research. Understanding of the processes of physiological systems is facilitated by the study of perturbed systems, and the reduction of gravity provides such an effect. Much remains to be discovered and understood. Such studies are a necessary prelude to defining file:///C|/SSB_old_web/prio1ch2.htm (13 of 19) [6/21/2004 10:00:45 AM]

Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2) limiting physiological factors for long voyages in space. Experiments need to be conducted in microgravity for at least as long as the contemplated voyage. Human productivity in space. We do not know whether crew members can withstand the effects of long-duration space missions of several years or more. Much basic and applied research is necessary to ascertain whether spaceship design and programming of activities can enhance the safety, efficiency, and accomplishments of crews on long-duration missions. The social effects of long-term confinement are unknown, but such confinement can be provided on the Earth. Very- long-term studies will be required. These should be started several decades before a long-term human mission is designed in detail. As with EOS, practical applications are likely to develop quickly based on the improved measurements and the enhanced understanding they generate. Effects at varying gravity-space-based centrifuge. Variable speed centrifuges in space will permit quantitative assessment of effects of different accelerations on physiological functions. Studies at 1 g either on the Earth or in a centrifuge in space would provide control states for comparison with microgravity environments. A centrifuge large enough to provide a living environment for crew members would permit determination of the extent to which constant acceleration can prevent or attenuate the physiological disturbances in space, especially those of bone and muscle. Even prolonged vigorous exercise has, at most, only limited effectiveness in microgravity. Reproduction in microgravity. Prolonged sojourns in space will provide the opportunity to determine whether sequential generations of higher plants and animals will occur in the absence of gravity. Table 2.1 shows how many of these and other initiatives and programs contribute in a major way to addressing the five questions used above in this chapter to organize the exposition of past accomplishments of the U.S. space research program. Major missions and smaller missions, of course, contribute to many questions simultaneously. Other initiatives often focus on just one of these areas. The scientific potential of the planned programs is tremendous. They are well planned and have been reviewed by scientists at many different levels, each group reaffirming their worth to science. When the small, less visible programs and the unseen opportunities that will arise from rapid advances in technology and scientific understanding are added to this list, the prospects are far greater than the support that will be available. As this list of prospects demonstrates, we must grapple with choices between large projects and small, between projects in different fields, and between support for mature fields versus support for untested ideas. To succeed in space research, we must push forward with new missions while reinvesting in human resources and the technology base necessary to maintain vigorous scientific enterprise. file:///C|/SSB_old_web/prio1ch2.htm (14 of 19) [6/21/2004 10:00:45 AM]

Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2) TABLE 2.1 Major Contributions of Future Initiatives and Programs to the "Large Questions" Major Contributions Understand- Initiatives Understand- Understand- Understand- ing Human and Programs Discovery ing Processes ing Origins ing Change Interaction RESEARCH AND X X X X X ANALYSIS BASE MISSION TO PLANET EARTH EOS X X X X Earth Probes X X Geosynchronous X platforms UARS X X X X TOPEX/ Poseidon X Upgraded X meteorological satellites Landsat/SPOT X X X X PLANETARY AND LUNAR EXPLORATION Mars Observer, Mars X X Aeronomy Observer, and Mars penetrators CRAF X X X Cassini X X X X Galileo X X X Poseidon X X X X Mars Rober and Sample X X X Return Venus Probe X X Rosetta X X Lunar Observer X X ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS Great Observatories X X X X file:///C|/SSB_old_web/prio1ch2.htm (15 of 19) [6/21/2004 10:00:45 AM]

Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2) OTHER ASTRONOMICAL MISSIONS EUVE X X Submillimeter wave X X astronomy XTE X X X Moon-based imaging X X X X interferometry Grand Tour Cluster X X SPACE PLASMA PHYSICS International Solar X X X Terrestrial Physics (ISTP) Program Orbiting Solar X X X Laboratory (OSL) Solar Probe X X X X Mesosphere Lower X X X Thermosphere (TIMED) Inner Magnetosphere X X Imager (IMI) Ionosphere- X X X Thermosphere- Magnetosphere Coupler (ITMC) Mercury Orbiter (MEO) X X High-Energy Solar X X X Physics (HESP) BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS IN SPACE LifeSat X X Spacelabs/Space X X Shuttle Space Station X X LESSONS LEARNED Many lessons are available from more than 30 years of experience in flying space research missions. Here they are coalesced into a few specific statements offered as guidance for the future: file:///C|/SSB_old_web/prio1ch2.htm (16 of 19) [6/21/2004 10:00:45 AM]

Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2) Routine access to space is of utmost importance to scientific research in space. Unfortunately, this does need to be said because space research has suffered from restricted access to space. Launch vehicles should be appropriate for the mission and should reliably achieve the needed orbit and launch date. The space program should minimize its reliance on a single launch capability. The main example of a failure to follow this principle is the forcing of all payloads onto the Shuttle. However, scientific research programs should also avoid excessive reliance on large, complex spacecraft. Space research requires a balance of large and small missions. The following two lessons are related to this one. Build spacecraft with robustness and flexibility. The Voyager spacecraft operated beyond their lifetimes, permitting scientifically exciting extended missions to Uranus and Neptune. Relatively inexpensive upgrades to Earth-based communication antennas maximized the data return from these most distant planets. Do not force scientific activities into an inappropriate approach. A prime example is the forcing of Hubble onto the Shuttle, with the consequence that it was required to operate in low Earth orbit and to be "man rated." These requirements diminished its scientific effectiveness, raised its costs, and increased its operational complexity by large factors. In almost all cases of interest, space-based scientific investigations must be complemented by other observations. For example, in the Earth sciences, surface verification of space measurements is essential. The Great Observatories cannot make all needed observations: the light-gathering capacity of large ground-based telescopes is needed for spectroscopy. For the lifetime of scientific programs, scientists should be intimately involved with the instruments making the observations. This lesson has several implications. For example, the principal investigator of the Solar Mesosphere Explorer was intimately involved with its development and operation and that was seen as contributing strongly to its scientific, schedule, and budget success. Another implication is that there must be continuous efforts to make data readily available to the scientists who will use it. An unfortunate example of the failure to do this is the filtering (by data management algorithm) of data on ozone concentrations, which delayed discovery of the antarctic ozone hole. A positive example of successful efforts to make data available is the unplanned use of Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) data to determine a global vegetation index. These data were intended only for cloud images and sea surface temperature maps. Adequately fund data analysis. Seasat is an example of a program that had grossly inadequate funding for data analysis, and the result was great delay of scientific results. A positive example is found in astronomy, where funds are available to do research using archived data. When proposals to use a certain data file:///C|/SSB_old_web/prio1ch2.htm (17 of 19) [6/21/2004 10:00:45 AM]

Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2) base are no longer being submitted, then those data probably have been adequately exploited for the time being. There is a need for more accountability in project management. The Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) is an example in which two centers had partial responsibility for a project. It was badly managed until responsibility was clarified. On the other hand, the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (UARS) project was not started until responsibilities were clear. In addition, the UARS managers made a careful cost estimate at the beginning, and the project has remained within that budget. Because the ultimate purpose is scientific research, one way to ensure accountability in science missions is to put scientists in charge. Another caveat with respect to project management accountability is that promises must be linked to reality. A primary example of the failure to do this was the claim that the Shuttle could be expected to fly 50 missions per year. Multiyear funding of basic research supporting spaceflight activities is essential. The development of new concepts and the exploitation of observations from space missions are both multiyear efforts and usually involve graduate students working on dissertations. Annual proposals and multiple grants take time and effort away from research and seriously impede progress. Basic research is a good investment. The fruits of space research are harvested by analysis of observations and modeling, efforts that reveal new opportunities for observation. When resources are severely limited, the best value is obtained from basic research, as supported by the research and analysis program, because it maintains the vigor of scientific research and education and provides the foundation for future scientific progress. Consensus works. When a community can say with one voice what needs to be done, it can have great force in budget and program planning. Two examples are the sequence of astronomy survey reports2 and the report of the federal Committee on Earth Sciences setting forth a national global change research program.3 NOTES 1. For additional National Research Council discussions on EOS, see Space Studies Board, "Space Studies Board Position on the NASA Earth Observing System" (unpublished report issued July 10, 1991) and the 1990 report of the Panel to Review the FY 1991 Global Change Research Program, The U.S. Global Change Research Program: An Assessment of FY 1991 Plans (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1990). 2. See, for example, the two most recent such surveys (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.): Astronomy Survey Committee, Astronomy and file:///C|/SSB_old_web/prio1ch2.htm (18 of 19) [6/21/2004 10:00:45 AM]

Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 2) Astrophysics for the 1980's (1982); Astronomy and Astrophysics Survey Committee, Board on Physics and Astronomy, The Decade of Discovery in Astronomy and Astrophysics (1991). 3. Committee on Earth Sciences. 1989. Our Changing Planet: A U.S. Strategy for Global Change Research, a report to accompany the U.S. President's Fiscal Year 1990 Budget. Last update 11/14/00 at 2:24 pm Site managed by Anne Simmons, Space Studies Board The National Academies Current Projects Publications Directories Search Site Map Feedback file:///C|/SSB_old_web/prio1ch2.htm (19 of 19) [6/21/2004 10:00:45 AM]

Next: Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives (Chapter 3) »
Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives Get This Book
×
 Setting Priorities for Space Research: Opportunities and Imperatives
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!