Saving Women's Lives: Strategies for Improving Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis: A Breast Cancer Research Foundation and Institute of Medicine Symposium (2005)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Saving Women's Lives: Strategies for Improving Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis: A Breast Cancer Research Foundation and Institute of Medicine ... References Adcock, K. 2004. Initiative to improve mammogram interpretation. The Permanente Journal 8(2):12-18. Astley, S, Mistry, T, Boggis, CRM, et al. 2002. Should we use humans or a machine to prescreen mammograms? In Peitgen, H-O, editor, Proceedings of the Sixth Interna- tional Workshop on Digital Mammography. Heidelberg: Springer. Pp. 476-480. Bassett, LW, Monsees, BS, Smith, RA, et al. 2003. Survey of radiology residents: breast imaging training and attitudes. Radiology 227(3):862-9. Beam, CA, Layde, PM, Sullivan, DC. 1996. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by U.S. radiologists. Findings from a national sample. Arch. Intern. Med. 156(2):209-13. Beam, CA, Conant, EF, Sickles, EA. 2003a. Association of volume and volume- independent factors with accuracy in screening mammograms. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 95(4):282-90. Beam, CA, Conant, EF, Sickles, EA, et al. 2003b. Evaluation of proscriptive health care policy implementation in screening mammography. Radiology 229(2):534-40. Berlin, L, Berlin, JW. 1995. Malpractice and radiologists in Cook County, IL: trends in 20 years of litigation. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 165(4):781-8. Bhargavan, M, Sunshine, JH. 2002. Workload of radiologists in the United States in 1998-1999 and trends since 1995-1996. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 179(5):1123-8. Billi, JE, Wise, CG, Bills, EA, et al. 1995. Potential effects of managed care on specialty practice at a university medical center. New Eng. J. Med. 333(15):979-83. Black, WC, Nease, RF, Jr., Tosteson, AN. 1995. Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger than 50 years of age. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 87(10):720-31. British Columbia Cancer Agency. 2003. Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia 2001/2002 Annual Report. Vancouver, British Columbia. Broeders, MJM. 2004. Impact of Breast Cancer Service Screening; Facts and Uncertain- ties. PrintPartners, Ipskamp, Enschede, Chapter 8:105. Burnside, E, Belkora, J, Esserman, L. 2001. The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States. Clin. Breast Can- cer 2(2):145-52. Coleman, MP, Gatta, G, Verdecchia, A, et al. 2003. EUROCARE-3 summary: cancer survival in Europe at the end of the 20th century. Ann. Oncol. 14(Suppl 5):128-49. Cummings, SR, Duong, T, Kenyon, E, et al. 2002. Serum estradiol level and risk of breast cancer during treatment with raloxifene. JAMA 287(2):216-20. 126 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. 

Saving Women's Lives: Strategies for Improving Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis: A Breast Cancer Research Foundation and Institute of Medicine ... REFERENCES 127 Curry, SL, Taplin, SH, Anderman, C, et al. 1993. A randomized trial of the impact of risk assessment and feedback on participation in mammography screening. Prev. Med. 22(3):350-60. Enzmann, DR, Anglada, P, Haviley, C, et al. 2001. Providing professional mammogra- phy services: financial analysis. Radiology 219(2):467-73. Fletcher, SW, Harris, RP, Gonzalez, JJ, et al. 1993. Increasing mammography utilization: a controlled study. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 85(2):112-20. Fryback, DL, Thornbury, JM. 1991. The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med. Decis. Making 11(2):88-94. Gail, MH, Brinton, LA, Byar, DP, et al. 1989. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 81(24):1879-86. Gilliland, FD, Rosenberg, RD, Hunt, WD, et al. 2000. Patterns of mammography use among Hispanic, American Indian, and Non-Hispanic white women in New Mexico, 1994-1997. Am. J. Epidemiol. 152(5):432-7. Hillman, BJ, Fajardo, LL, Hunter, TB, et al. 1987. Mammogram interpretation by physi- cian assistants Am. J. Roentgenol. 149(5):907-12. Hunt, KA, Rosen, EL, Sickles, EA. 1999. Outcome analysis for women undergoing an- nual versus biennial screening mammography: a review of 24,211 examinations. Am. J. Roentgenol. 173(2):285-9. Hutton, BJ, Brad, EK, Chen, JH, et al. 2004. Breast Cancer—Screening Data for Assess- ing Quality of Services—New York, 2000-2003. MMWR 53(21):455-7. Institute of Medicine. 1990. Breast Cancer: Setting Priorities of Effectiveness Research. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Institute of Medicine. 1997. A Review of the Department of Defense Program for Breast Cancer Research. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Institute of Medicine. 2001. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2001. Mammography and Beyond: Technologies for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2003. Large-Scale Biomedical Science: Exploring Strategies for Future Research. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press. Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2004. Meeting Psychosocial Needs of Women with Breast Cancer. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press. Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2005. Saving Women’s Lives, Strategies for Improving Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press. International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2002. Breast cancer screening, Volume 7. Lyons, France: IARC Press. Kan, L, Olivotto, IA, Warren Burhenne, LJ, et al. 2000. Standardized abnormal interpre- tation and cancer detection ratios to assess reading volume and reader performance in a breast screening program. Radiology 215(2):563-7. Kaye, AD. 2004. Mammography and Monkey Bars. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 1(6):379-80. Kriege, M, Brekelmans, CT, Boetes, C, et al. 2004. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. New Eng. J. Med. 351(5):427-500. Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. 

Saving Women's Lives: Strategies for Improving Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis: A Breast Cancer Research Foundation and Institute of Medicine ... 128 SAVING WOMEN’S LIVES SYMPOSIUM Le Naour, F, Misek, DE, Krause, MC, et al. 2001. Proteomics-based identification of RS/DJ-1 as a novel circulating tumor antigen in breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 7(11):3325-7. Meissner, HI, Smith, RA, Rimer, BK, et al. 2004. Promoting cancer screening: learning from experience. Cancer 101(Suppl 5):1107-17. Michaelson, J, Satija, S, Moore, R, et al. 2002. The pattern of breast cancer screening utilization and its consequences Cancer 94(1):37-43. Physician Insurers Association of America. 2002. Breast Cancer Study: Third Edition. Washington, D.C. Pickhardt, PJ, Choi, JR, Hwang, I, et al. 2003. Computed tomographic virtual colono- scopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N. Eng. J. Med. 349(23):2191-200. Reynolds, J. 1999. Putting prevention into practice—the community’s role (news). Ann. Int. Med. 130(8):1707-8. Rockhill, G, Byrne, C, Rosner, B, et al. 2003. Breast cancer risk prediction with a log- incidence model: evaluation of accuracy. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 56(9):856-61. Saketkhoo, DD, Covey, AM, Sunshine, J, et al. 2002. Updated findings from a help wanted index of job advertisements and an analysis of the policy implications: is the job market shortage for diagnostic radiologist stabilizing? Am J. Roentgenol. 179(4):851-8. Schwartz, D, Lellouch, J. 1967. Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. J. Chronic Dis. 20(8):637-48. Singletary, SE. 2003. Rating the risk factors for breast cancer. Ann. Surg. 237(4):474-82. Smith-Bindman, R, Chu, PW, Miglioretti, D.L. et al. 2003. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom. JAMA 290(16): 2129-37. Sorlie, T, Tibshirani, R, Parker, J, et al. 2003. Repeated observation of breast tumor sub- types in independent gene expression data sets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100(14):8418-23. Stone, EG, Morton, SL, Hulscher, ME, et al. 2002. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann. Intern. Med. 136(9):641-51. Sumkin, JH, Klaman, HM, Graham, M, et al. 2003. Prescreening mammography by tech- nologists: a preliminary assessment. Am. J. Roentgenol. 180(1):253-6. Sunshine, JH, Cypel, YS, Schepps, G. 2002. Diagnostic radiologists in 2000: basic char- acteristics, practices, and issues related to the radiologist shortage. Am. J. Roent- genol. 178(2):291-301. Tabar, L, Yen, MF, Bitak, B, et al. 2003. Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screen- ing. Lancet 361(9367):1405-10. Taplin, SH, Anderman, C, Grothaus, L, et al. 1994. Using physician correspondence and postcard reminders to promote mammography use. Am. J. Public Health 84(4): 571-4. Taplin, SH, Barlow, WE, Ludman, E, et al. 2000. Testing reminder and motivational telephone calls to increase screening mammography: a randomized study. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92(3):233-42. Taplin, SH, Rutler, CM, Finder, C, et al. 2002. Screening mammography: clinical image quality and the risk of interval breast cancer. Am. J. Roentgenol. 178(4):797-803. Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. 

Saving Women's Lives: Strategies for Improving Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis: A Breast Cancer Research Foundation and Institute of Medicine ... REFERENCES 129 Taplin, SH, Ichikawa, L, Buist, DS, et al. 2004a. Evaluating organized breast cancer screening implementation: the prevention of late stage disease? Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 13(2):225-34. Taplin, SH, Ichikawa, L, Ulcickas-Yood, M, et al. 2004b. A reason for late-stage breast cancer: absence of screening or detection, or breakdown in follow-up? J. Natl. Can- cer Inst. 96(20). Tunis, SR, Stryer, DB, Clancy, CM. 2003. Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA 290(12):1624-32. U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO-02-532). 2002. Mammography: Capacity Gener- ally Exists to Deliver Services. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Wald, NJ, Hackstraw, AK, Frost, CD. 1999 When can a risk factor be used as a worth- while screening test? BMJ 319(7224):1562-5. Welch, HG. 2004. Should I Be Tested for Cancer? Maybe Not and Here’s Why. Univer- sity of California Press. Zheng, B, Swensson, RG, Golla, S, et al. 2004. Detection and classification performance levels of mammographic masses under different computer-aided detection cueing environments. Acad. Radiol. 11(4):398-406. Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. 

Saving Women's Lives: Strategies for Improving Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis: A Breast Cancer Research Foundation and Institute of Medicine ... Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.