National Academies Press: OpenBook

Geologic Mapping: Future Needs (1988)

Chapter: Appendix B: Sampling and General Results (Tables 1-13)

« Previous: Appendix A: National Research Council Geoscience Mapping Questionainaire
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sampling and General Results (Tables 1-13)." National Research Council. 1988. Geologic Mapping: Future Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11162.
×

APPENDIX B

SAMPLING AND GENERAL RESULTS

(Tables 113)

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sampling and General Results (Tables 1-13)." National Research Council. 1988. Geologic Mapping: Future Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11162.
×

TABLE 1 Distribution of Questionnaires Mailed and Returned Listed by Professional Association

Association

Members in Polled Pool

Number Mailed

Respondents

Nonrespondents

Relevant

Not Relevanta

Otherb

Undelivered

No Response

AAPG

24,133

802

297 (37)

18 (2)

13 (2)

80 (10)

390 (49)

AEG

2,233

71

41 (58)

1 (1)

4 (6)

2 (3)

23 (33)

AICP

4,667

129

30 (24)

5 (4)

4 (3)

6 (5)

83 (64)

AWRA

1,933

57

22 (39)

2 (3)

1 (1)

2 (3)

30 (53)

GSA

9,800

264

158 (56)

7 (3)

12 (4)

11 (4)

87 (33)

SEXG

10,500

343

100 (32)

26 (8)

3 (1)

30 (9)

173 (50)

SEG

1,700

52

24 (50)

2 (4)

1 (1)

7 (13)

16 (31)

SEPM

3,967

148

64 (45)

6 (4)

1 (1)

32 (22)

43 (29)

SME (AIME)

19,000

658

131 (20)

26 (4)

25 (4)

86 (13)

388 (59)

TOTAL

77,933

2,524

857

93

64

256

1,233

NOTE: Percentages (in parentheses) for each cagegory of mailed out questionnaires

a Respondents returning questionnaire with comment that information requested is not relevant to their work.

b Category includes following reasons stated by respondents for not completing questionnaire: Did not complete; Unable to complete; Too busy to complete; Retired; Sabbatical; No longer with company; Unemployed; Illness; Deceased.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sampling and General Results (Tables 1-13)." National Research Council. 1988. Geologic Mapping: Future Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11162.
×

TABLE 2 Distribution of Respondents by State

Alabama

8

Louisiana

47

Ohio

14

Alaska

11

Maine

2

Oklahoma

57

Arizona

25

Maryland

6

Oregon

8

Arkansas

5

Massachusetts

15

Pennsylvania

31

California

125

Michigan

12

Rhode Island

1

Colorado

152

Minnesota

9

South Carolina

4

Connecticut

4

Mississippi

11

South Dakota

2

Delaware

3

Missouri

9

Tennessee

10

Florida

18

Montana

9

Texas

220

Georgia

12

Nebraska

1

Utah

32

Hawaii

3

Nevada

16

Vermont

2

Idaho

10

New Hampshire

0

Virginia

27

Illinois

17

New Jersey

7

Washington

16

Indiana

8

New Mexico

24

West Virginia

5

Iowa

1

New York

22

Wisconsin

9

Kansas

7

North Carolina

5

Wyoming

20

Kentucky

10

North Dakota

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

Response 1077

TABLE 3 Respondents by Category of Employment

Category

Respondents

Individual Response

Response for Organization

Organization Map Users

Total Map Use

Academic

158

101

57

1,143

1,244

Private industry

592

211

380

7,787

7,999

Consulting

211

92

119

753

845

Local government

31

13

18

87

100

State government

45

10

34

367

377

Federal government

121

78

43

1,085

1,163

Other

55

17

38

527

544

TOTAL

1,213

523

689

11,749

12,272

TABLE 4 Activities Respondents Consider “Extremely Important” to Their Work

 

Category of Employment

Work Activity

Academic

Government

Industry

Other

Total

Resource planning

20 (8)

56 (17)

167 (11)

10 (22)

253

Resource exploration

41 (16)

53 (16)

584 (39)

5 (11)

683

Resource development

13 (5)

37 (11)

382 (26)

5 (11)

437

Scientific research

123 (48)

72 (22)

122 (8)

5 (11)

322

Engineering

13 (5)

50 (15)

138 (9)

11 (25)

212

Hazard mitigation

12 (5)

54 (16)

76 (5)

8 (18)

150

Other

32 (13)

8 (3)

22 (2)

1 (2)

63

TOTAL

254

330

1491

45

2120

NOTE: Number of respondents followed by percentage (in parentheses).

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sampling and General Results (Tables 1-13)." National Research Council. 1988. Geologic Mapping: Future Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11162.
×

TABLE 5 Percentage of Categories of Employment Performing Each Work Activity

Work Activity

Academic

Government

Industry

Other

Resource planning

8

22

66

4

Resource exploration

6

8

85

1

Resource development

3

9

87

1

Scientific research

38

22

38

1

Engineering

6

24

65

5

Hazard mitigation

8

36

51

5

Other

50

13

35

2

TABLE 6 Responses to Question 4 Showing Estimated Number of Maps Used per Year

Number of Maps

Number of Respondents

Blank

202 (19)

1–9

101 (9)

10–49

284 (26)

50–99

136 (13)

100–499

298 (27)

>500

54 (5)

>1000

10 (1)

TOTAL

1085

NOTE: Percent of respondents shown in parentheses.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sampling and General Results (Tables 1-13)." National Research Council. 1988. Geologic Mapping: Future Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11162.
×

TABLE 7a Map Usage (Number per Year) by Category of Work

Category

0

0–9

10–49

50–99

100–499

500–999

>1000

Academic

25

12

57

22

36

8

1

Industry

116

65

128

67

181

42

6

Consultant

39

14

51

43

63

4

0

Local government

8

6

8

2

7

0

0

State government

11

5

5

7

10

2

1

Federal government

14

6

52

10

38

1

2

Other

10

6

21

5

11

3

0

TABLE 7b Map Usage (Number per Year) by Work Activity

CATEGORY

0

0–9

10–49

50–99

100–499

500–999

>1000

Resource planning

25

15

62

30

69

20

3

Resourse exploration

111

50

169

89

217

41

8

Resource development

78

31

94

59

139

33

6

Scientific research

51

24

97

36

94

17

3

Engineering

43

22

53

83

51

10

2

Hazard mitigation

23

13

43

23

43

6

0

Other

9

6

17

9

17

4

1

TABLE 8 Source of Geoscience Maps Used by Categories

 

Category of Employment

Work Activity

Academic

Government

Industry

Other

Total

Federal agency

136 (40)

141 (40)

419 (27)

18 (32)

714

State agency

80 (24)

80 (23)

281 (18)

12 (22)

453

Local agency

8 (2)

11 (3)

63 (4)

7 (13)

89

Academia

48 (14)

23 (7)

74 (5)

1 (2)

146

Self-produced

54 (16)

84 (24)

584 (38)

12 (22)

734

Other

15 (4)

11 (3)

117 (8)

5 (9)

148

TOTAL

341

350

1,538

55

2,284

NOTE: Number of respondents followed by percentage (in parentheses).

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sampling and General Results (Tables 1-13)." National Research Council. 1988. Geologic Mapping: Future Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11162.
×

TABLE 9 Number and Percentage of Responses Indicating Printing Styles Favored for Different Geoscience Map Types

Style

Geologic

Geophysical

Groundwater

Total

Full Color

651 (52)

137 (19)

87 (25)

875

One Color

226 (18)

154 (21)

103 (29)

483

Black & White

381 (30)

431 (60)

160 (46)

972

TOTAL

1258

722

350

2330

NOTE: Percentage shown (in parentheses) is percentage of each style for the map type indicated.

TABLE 10 Number and Percentage (in parentheses) of Responses Indicating Bases Considered “Extremely Important” for Three Geoscience Map Types

Base Map

Geologic

Geophysical

Groundwater

Total

Topographic

827 (35)

459 (35)

278 (30)

1564

Land net

379 (16)

268 (21)

114 (12)

761

Culture

216 (9)

154 (12)

109 (12)

479

Drainage

422 (18)

188 (14)

255 (28)

865

Orthophoto

125 (5)

52 (4)

38 (4)

215

Orthophoto quad

140 (6)

63 (5)

44 (5)

247

Composite

248 (10)

112 (9)

74 (8)

434

TABLE 11 Relative Importance of Different Scales for Three Types of Geoscience Maps with Percentages of Scale Category for Each Map Type

Scale

Geologic

Geophysical

Groundwater

Total

Large

766 (40)

481 (41)

221 (57)

1468 (43)

Medium

533 (28)

312 (27)

43 (11)

888 (26)

Small

290 (15)

185 (16)

123 (32)

598 (17)

Regional

306 (16)

192 (16)

0 (0)

498 (14)

TOTAL

1895

1170

387

3452

NOTE: Large is less than 1:24:000; medium is 1:24,000 to 1:62,500; small is 1:100,000 to 1:250,000; regional is greater than 1:250,000.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sampling and General Results (Tables 1-13)." National Research Council. 1988. Geologic Mapping: Future Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11162.
×

TABLE 12 Relative Importance of Different Scales for Three Types of Geoscience Maps with Percentages of Scale Category for Each Map Type

Scale

Geologic

Geophysical

Groundwater

Large

52

33

15

Medium

60

35

5

Small

48

31

21

Regional

61

39

0

NOTE: Large is less than 1:24:000; medium is 1:24,000 to 1:62,500; small is 1:100,000 to 1:250,000; regional is greater than 1:250,000.

TABLE 13 Number of Responses and Percentages (in parentheses) Indicating Importance Accorded Different Self -Produced Map Types by Organizational Groups

Map Type

Academic

Government

Industry

Other

Responses

Geologic

102 (39)

86 (31)

603 (37)

13 (28)

804

Geophysical

40 (15)

33 (12)

404 (25)

10 (22)

487

Geochemical

17 (6)

26 (10)

149 (9)

2 (4)

194

Metallogenic

9 (3)

13 (5)

67 (4)

0 (0)

89

Derivative geologic

37 (14)

40 (15)

244 (15)

3 (7)

324

Groundwater

27 (10)

42 (15)

92 (6)

6 (13)

167

Derivative land use

19 (7)

27 (10)

66 (4)

10 (22)

122

Other

12 (5)

7 (3)

22 (1)

2 (2)

43

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sampling and General Results (Tables 1-13)." National Research Council. 1988. Geologic Mapping: Future Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11162.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sampling and General Results (Tables 1-13)." National Research Council. 1988. Geologic Mapping: Future Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11162.
×
Page 45
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sampling and General Results (Tables 1-13)." National Research Council. 1988. Geologic Mapping: Future Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11162.
×
Page 46
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sampling and General Results (Tables 1-13)." National Research Council. 1988. Geologic Mapping: Future Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11162.
×
Page 47
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sampling and General Results (Tables 1-13)." National Research Council. 1988. Geologic Mapping: Future Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11162.
×
Page 48
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sampling and General Results (Tables 1-13)." National Research Council. 1988. Geologic Mapping: Future Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11162.
×
Page 49
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sampling and General Results (Tables 1-13)." National Research Council. 1988. Geologic Mapping: Future Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11162.
×
Page 50
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sampling and General Results (Tables 1-13)." National Research Council. 1988. Geologic Mapping: Future Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11162.
×
Page 51
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sampling and General Results (Tables 1-13)." National Research Council. 1988. Geologic Mapping: Future Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11162.
×
Page 52
Next: Appendix C: Present and Future Needs for Geoscience Maps by Region (Table 14) »
Geologic Mapping: Future Needs Get This Book
×
 Geologic Mapping: Future Needs
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!