|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. specificity of association, 4, 23–24 strength of evidence of an association, 4, 22–23 categories used to evaluate indoor pollutants related to, 25 conclusions about, 264–266 from exposure to fuels, 242, 244 key studies of, 265–266 “physician-diagnosed,” 246 ATS. See American Thoracic Society ATSDR. See Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Australia, studies from cited, 241, 243, 255, 257, 260, 320 B Bias, 24–25 in assessing the strength of the evidence, 24–25 confounding, 25 information bias, 24–25 selection bias, 24 Bioassays, chronic, 47 Biologic plausibility, in assessing the strength of the evidence, 3, 16, 24 Biological monitoring data, 26n Biomass-fuel combustion, 261–262 population-based studies of, 261–262 Biomass studies, 262–264 Birth defects, 310–311 conclusions about, 311 in Gulf War Veterans, 288–290 Bladder cancer, 111–119 conclusions about, 118–119 and exposure to combustion products, 114–118 additional studies on cancers of the renal pelvis, 118 case-control studies, 115–118 cohort studies, 114–115 selected epidemiologic studies, 200–206 and exposure to fuels, 111–114 case-control studies, 111–114 selected epidemiologic studies, 198–200 Blinding, 406 Bolivia, studies from cited, 262, 268 Bosnia veterans, 257–258
|
|
|||||||||||||||
