References

Bedient, P.B., H.S. Rifai, and C. J. Newell. 1999. Groundwater Contamination: Transport and Remediation. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.


Colwell, F. 2004. Biotechnology perspective on NRC committee’s charge: Science to address EM’s near-term needs. Presentation to the National Research Council’s Committee on Opportunities for Accelerating Characterization and Treatment of Waste at DOE Nuclear Weapons Sites, Idaho Falls, Idaho, March 8.

Conner, Jesse R. 1990. Chemical Fixation and Solidification of Hazardous Wastes. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Cowan, M., J.B. Mason, D. Schmoker, and T. Oliver. 2004. Steam Reforming Technology for Denitration and Immobilization of DOE Tank Wastes. Conference Proceedings: Waste Management ’04, Tucson, Ariz. WM Symposia, Inc. February 29–March 4.

Curl, R., W. St. Michel, and S. Lott. 2002. Payload enhancement for transporting TRU waste within restrictive regulatory limits. Presented to the TRU and Mixed Waste Focus Area End-User Review, Baltimore, Md., March 19–21. Available at: <http://tmfa.inel.gov/Documents/MY02Trans.pdf>.


Daily, W., A. Ramirez, and A. Binley. 2004. Remote monitoring of leaks in storage tanks using electrical resistance tomography: Application at the Hanford site. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 9:(1), 11–24.

Daniel, D.E. and R.M. Koerner. 1993. Cover Systems, in Geotechnical Practice for Waste Disposal, Ed. D.E. Daniel, Chapman and Hall, pp. 455–496.

Daniel, D.E., and B.A. Gross. 1996. Caps, in Assessment of Barrier Containment Technologies, R.R. Rumear and J.K. Mitchell (eds.), National Technical Information Services, PB96-180583, Springfield, VA, pp. 119–140.

Department of Energy (DOE). 1996. The 1996 Baseline Environmental Management Report. DOE/EM-0290. Volume I. Office of Environmental Management. June.

DOE. 1997. Linking Legacies: Connecting the Cold War Nuclear Weapons Productin Processes to Their Environmental Consequences. DOE/EM-0319. Office of Environmental Management. January.

DOE. 1998a. Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure. DOE/EM-0362. Washington, D.C.: Office of Environmental Management, June.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 56
Improving the Characterization and Treatment of Radioactive Wastes for the Department of Energy’s Accelerated Site Cleanup Program References Bedient, P.B., H.S. Rifai, and C. J. Newell. 1999. Groundwater Contamination: Transport and Remediation. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Colwell, F. 2004. Biotechnology perspective on NRC committee’s charge: Science to address EM’s near-term needs. Presentation to the National Research Council’s Committee on Opportunities for Accelerating Characterization and Treatment of Waste at DOE Nuclear Weapons Sites, Idaho Falls, Idaho, March 8. Conner, Jesse R. 1990. Chemical Fixation and Solidification of Hazardous Wastes. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Cowan, M., J.B. Mason, D. Schmoker, and T. Oliver. 2004. Steam Reforming Technology for Denitration and Immobilization of DOE Tank Wastes. Conference Proceedings: Waste Management ’04, Tucson, Ariz. WM Symposia, Inc. February 29–March 4. Curl, R., W. St. Michel, and S. Lott. 2002. Payload enhancement for transporting TRU waste within restrictive regulatory limits. Presented to the TRU and Mixed Waste Focus Area End-User Review, Baltimore, Md., March 19–21. Available at: <http://tmfa.inel.gov/Documents/MY02Trans.pdf>. Daily, W., A. Ramirez, and A. Binley. 2004. Remote monitoring of leaks in storage tanks using electrical resistance tomography: Application at the Hanford site. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 9:(1), 11–24. Daniel, D.E. and R.M. Koerner. 1993. Cover Systems, in Geotechnical Practice for Waste Disposal, Ed. D.E. Daniel, Chapman and Hall, pp. 455–496. Daniel, D.E., and B.A. Gross. 1996. Caps, in Assessment of Barrier Containment Technologies, R.R. Rumear and J.K. Mitchell (eds.), National Technical Information Services, PB96-180583, Springfield, VA, pp. 119–140. Department of Energy (DOE). 1996. The 1996 Baseline Environmental Management Report. DOE/EM-0290. Volume I. Office of Environmental Management. June. DOE. 1997. Linking Legacies: Connecting the Cold War Nuclear Weapons Productin Processes to Their Environmental Consequences. DOE/EM-0319. Office of Environmental Management. January. DOE. 1998a. Accelerating Cleanup: Paths to Closure. DOE/EM-0362. Washington, D.C.: Office of Environmental Management, June.

OCR for page 56
Improving the Characterization and Treatment of Radioactive Wastes for the Department of Energy’s Accelerated Site Cleanup Program DOE. 1998b. An Environmental Success Story: Expediting the Removal Approach for Remediating and Releasing the Mound Plant. DOE-EH-9802. DOE Office of Environmental Health and Safety, Washington, D.C., March. DOE. 2000a. Maintenance Plan for the Composite Analysis of the Hanford Site, Southeast Washington. DOE-RL 2000-29. U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington, March. DOE. 2000b. Status Report on Paths to Closure. DOE/EM-0526. Office of Environmental Management, Washington, D.C., March. DOE. 2002a. A Review of the Environmental Management Program. Presented to the Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management by the Top-to-Bottom Review Team. Office of Environmental Management, Washington, D.C., February. DOE. 2002b. Civilian Radioactive Waste Management System. Waste Acceptance System Requirements Document. DOE/RW-0351. Rev. 4. Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Washington, D.C., January. DOE. 2002c. Critical Decision Package for EM Risk Reduction Project: Managing Waste to Reduce Risk (Other than Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Waste). Office of Environmental Management, Washington, D.C., October 17. DOE. 2003. The Department of Energy Strategic Plan: Protecting National, Energy, and Economic Security with Advanced Science and Technology and Ensuring Environmental Cleanup. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C., September 30. DOE. 2004. Department of Energy FY 2005 Congressional Budget Request. Assistant Secretary Jessie H. Roberson’s FY 2005 Background Information for the Budget Rollout Presentation. Department of Energy. February. Available at http://web.em.doe.gov/budget_docs.html. Ditmars, J. 2002. Adaptive Sampling and Analysis Programs Demonstrate Value of “Triad Approach” for Contaminated Soil Sites. Brownfield 2002 Conference Proceedings. Charlotte, N.C., November 13–15. Doornbos, M.H. 2004. Building CPP-627 Deactivation, Decontamination, and Decommissioning Can Be Performed Under the Department of Energy’s CERCLA Removal Action Authority. White Paper. Document 24828. Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Idaho Falls, Idaho, February 16. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1997. Rules of Thumb for Superfund Remedy Selection. Report No. EPA 540-R-97-103. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. EPA. (1999a). Monitored Natural Attenuation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons. U.S. EPA Remediation Technology Fact Sheet. US EPA Report EPA/600/F-98/021. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. May 1999. EPA. (1999b). Monitored Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Solvents. U.S. EPA Remediation Technology Fact Sheet. US EPA Report EPA/600/F-98/022. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. May 1999. EPA. 2000. Innovations in Site Characterization: Geophysical Investigation at Hazardous Waste Sites. Report No. EPA-542-R-00-003. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. EPA. 2002. Groundwater Remedies Selected at Superfund Sites. Report No. EPA-542-R-01-022. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., January. General Accounting Office (GAO). 1996. Greater Use of Removal Actions Could Cut Time and Cost for Cleanups. GAO/RCED-96-124. United States General Accounting Office, Washington, D.C., May. Gray, L.W., G. Hovis, R. Jones, and M. Smith. 1999. The Can-in-Canister—Then and Now. Report PIP-99-151. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, October 28.

OCR for page 56
Improving the Characterization and Treatment of Radioactive Wastes for the Department of Energy’s Accelerated Site Cleanup Program Herman, S.A., E.P. Laws, and T.P. Grumbly. 1995. Policy on Decommissioning Department of Energy Facilities Under CERCLA. Joint Memorandum. U.S. Department of Energy and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., May 22. Holmes, F. 2004. INTEC Overview. Presentation to the National Research Council’s Committee on Opportunities for Accelerating Characterization and Treatment of Waste at DOE Nuclear Weapons Sites, Idaho Falls, Idaho, March 8. Huff, D., J.D. Long, and A. Naudts. 1996. Radwaste Source Control by Surgical Strike– A cost-effective strategy. Radwaste Magazine (November) 16. Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL). 2003. Science and Technology Roadmap: Long-Term Stewardship. DOE/ID-10926. U.S. Department of Energy, Idaho Operations Office. September. Italiano, M. 2004. Personal Communication from Marc Italiano, Department of Energy Carlsbad, New Mexico, Field Office to John Wiley, National Academies’ Board on Radioactive Waste Management, July 1. Jantzen, C.M. 2004. Characterization and Performance of Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming Product as a Final Waste Form. Environmetal Issues and Waste Management Technologies IX, J.D. Vienna and D.R. Spearing (Eds.), Ceramic Transactions 155, 319–329. Lenhard, R.J., A. Yonk, P. Wright, and J. Herzog, 2004. The INEEL site: An over-view of site history and soil and groundwater contamination issues. Vadoze Zone Journal 3: 1–5. Massarsch, K.R. 1999. Deep compaction of granular soils. Presented at Zhejiang University International Lecture Series on Geotechnical Engineering and Its Development in the 21st Century, January 21. Copyright Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, PR China. National Academy of Sciences (NAS). 2000. The Spent-Fuel Standard for Disposition of Excess Weapon Plutonium: Application to Current DOE Options. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. National Research Council (NRC). 1990a. Groundwater Models: Scientific and Regulatory Applications. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 1990b. Rethinking High-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 1998. Research Reactor Aluminum Spent Fuel: Treatment Options for Disposal. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 1999a. The State of Development of Waste Forms for Mixed Wastes. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 1999b. Groundwater and Soil Cleanup: Improving Management of Persistent Contaminants. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2000a. Long-Term Institutional Management of U.S. Department of Energy Waste Sites. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2000b. Natural Attenuation for Groundwater Remediation. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2000c. Alternative High-Level Waste Treatments at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2001a. Improving Operations and Long-Term Safety of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Final Report. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2001b. Research Opportunities for Deactivating and Decommissioning Department of Energy Facilities. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2001c. Disposition of High-Level Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel: The Continuing Societal and Technical Challenges. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2002a. Characterization of Remote-Handled Transuranic Waste for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Final Report. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

OCR for page 56
Improving the Characterization and Treatment of Radioactive Wastes for the Department of Energy’s Accelerated Site Cleanup Program NRC. 2002b. Research Opportunities for Managing the Department of Energy’s Transuranic and Mixed Wastes. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. NRC. 2003a. Improving the Scientific Basis for Managing DOE’s Excess Nuclear Materials and Spent Nuclear Fuel. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. NRC. 2003b. Long-Term Stewardship of DOE Legacy Sites: Interim Report. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. NRC. 2003c. Environmental Cleanup at Navy Facilities. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. NRC. 2003d. One Step at a Time: The Staged Development of Geologic Repositories for High-Level Radioactive Waste. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. NRC. 2004. Improving the Characterization Program for Contact-Handled Transuranic Waste Bound for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. National Resources Defense Council (NRDC). 2003. National Resources Defense Council, et al., v. Spencer Abraham. Memorandum Decision. Civ. No. 01-0413-S-BLW. United States District Court, District of Idaho, July. Oak Ridge Operations Office (ORO). 2002. Oak Ridge Performance Management Plan. Rev. 6. U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge Operations Office, Oak Ridge, Tenn. August 28. Occhipinti, J.E. 2004. Defense Waste Processing Facility accelerated waste throughput. Presentation to the National Research Council’s Committee on Opportunities for Accelerating Characterization and Treatment of Waste at DOE Nuclear Weapons Sites, Augusta, Ga., January 22. Parker, F.L. 2004. Rethinking low-level radioactive waste disposal. Conference Proceedings: Waste Management ’04, Tucson, Ariz. WM Symposia, Inc. February 29-March 4. Provencher, R. 2004. Accelerating INEEL cleanup: Management overview. Presentation to the National Research Council’s Committee on Opportunities for Accelerating Characterization and Treatment of Waste at DOE Nuclear Weapons Sites, Idaho Falls, Idaho, March 8. Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCC). 2003. Public Service Company of Colorado v. Dirk Kempthorne; U.S. v. Dirk Kempthorne. Order. Case No. 91-054-S-EJL. United States District Court, District of Idaho, March 31. Read, P.M., T.R. Ellsworth, and B.S. Minsker. 2004. Spatial interpolation methods for non-stationary plume data. Groundwater 42(2). Richland Operations Office (ROO). 2004. Final Hanford Site Solid (Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program Environmental Impact Statement. DOE/EIS-0286F. U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Wash. January. Roberson, J.H. 2004. The U.S. DOE EM Waste Management Program in 2004. Conference Proceedings: Waste Management ’04, Tucson, Ariz. WM Symposia, Inc. February 29– March 4. Rushton, J., and C. Forsberg. 2001. Uranium-233. Presented to the National Research Council’s Committee on Improving the Scientific Basis for Managing Nuclear Materials and Spent Nuclear Fuel through the Environmental Management Science Program. Oak Ridge, Tennessee. March 6. Savannah River Site (SRS). 2002. Environmental Management Program Performance Management Plan. WSRC-RP-2002-000245. Rev.6. Westinghouse Savannah River Company, Aiken, S.C., August 7. Siskin, E. 2002. Revised U.S. plutonium disposition strategy. Presented to the National Research Council’s Board on Radioactive Waste Management, Washington, D.C., July 30.

OCR for page 56
Improving the Characterization and Treatment of Radioactive Wastes for the Department of Energy’s Accelerated Site Cleanup Program Suter, II, G.W., R.J. Luxmore, and E.D. Smith. 1993. Compacted Soil Barriers at Abandoned Landfill Sites are Likely to Fail in the Long-Term, Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol. 22, pp. 217–226. Versteeg, R., M. Ankeny, J. Harbour, G. Heath, K. Kostelnik, E. Mattson, K. Moor, A. Richardson, and K.Wangerud. 2004. A structured approach to the use of near surface geophysics in long term monitoring. The Leading Edge of Geophysics 23(7): 700–703. Wentz, C.A. 1995. Hazardous Waste Management. New York: McGraw Hill. Whicker, F.W., T.G. Hinton, M.M. MacDonell, J.E. Pinder III, and L.J. Habegger. 2004. Avoiding destructive remediation at DOE sites. Science 303:1615–1616.