National Academies Press: OpenBook

Final Comments on the Science Plan for the North Pacific Research Board (2005)

Chapter: A Committee on a Science Plan for the North Pacific Research Board Statement of Task difficulties and pitfalls.

« Previous: References
Suggested Citation:"A Committee on a Science Plan for the North Pacific Research Board Statement of Task difficulties and pitfalls.." National Research Council. 2005. Final Comments on the Science Plan for the North Pacific Research Board. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11235.
×

Appendixes

Suggested Citation:"A Committee on a Science Plan for the North Pacific Research Board Statement of Task difficulties and pitfalls.." National Research Council. 2005. Final Comments on the Science Plan for the North Pacific Research Board. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11235.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"A Committee on a Science Plan for the North Pacific Research Board Statement of Task difficulties and pitfalls.." National Research Council. 2005. Final Comments on the Science Plan for the North Pacific Research Board. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11235.
×

A
Committee on a Science Plan for the North Pacific Research Board Statement of Task

The NRC study committee will assist the NPRB in developing a science plan that (1) is comprehensive and long range (10-20 years), (2) identifies major research themes, with emphasis on marine resource management issues, (3) is flexible, dynamic, and able to adapt to new research and monitoring findings, (4) is responsive to the vision, mission and goals of the NPRB and addresses the elements of a science plan identified as important by the NPRB, (5) builds on past and ongoing research programs of the Federal government, the State of Alaska, universities, and other relevant entities, (6) has a high probability of furthering the goals and objectives of the NPRB and maintaining awareness of the need to sustain a variety of marine resources and (7) is consistent with NPRB enabling legislation.

In addition, the committee should consider questions such as the appropriate balance between process studies and time-series studies, the role of modeling, the availability and usefulness of proxy and historical data, coordination with other activities (including international activities), and any other issues related to assuring the program has a strong strategic vision and sound management and oversight. To guide the NPRB as it develops its science plan, the committee will:

  • Identify broad research themes in the North Pacific, Bering Sea, and Arctic Ocean region, through discussions and a workshop.

  • Conduct a series of site visits in Alaska to gather further input on the research themes.

  • Provide supporting information and recommendations for achieving the desired attributes of the plan.

  • Prepare an interim report that outlines the components of a successful long-term science plan and provides guidance to NPRB as it develops its plan, drawing on insights gained from past reviews of similar science plans to help the NPRB avoid known difficulties and pitfalls.

  • Subsequently review the science plan drafted by the NPRB in light of the identified research themes and overall guidance provided in the interim report, making any necessary suggestions for improvement.

Suggested Citation:"A Committee on a Science Plan for the North Pacific Research Board Statement of Task difficulties and pitfalls.." National Research Council. 2005. Final Comments on the Science Plan for the North Pacific Research Board. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11235.
×
Page 17
Suggested Citation:"A Committee on a Science Plan for the North Pacific Research Board Statement of Task difficulties and pitfalls.." National Research Council. 2005. Final Comments on the Science Plan for the North Pacific Research Board. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11235.
×
Page 18
Suggested Citation:"A Committee on a Science Plan for the North Pacific Research Board Statement of Task difficulties and pitfalls.." National Research Council. 2005. Final Comments on the Science Plan for the North Pacific Research Board. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11235.
×
Page 19
Next: B Elements of a Science Plan for the North Pacific Research Board: Interim Report Executive Summary »
Final Comments on the Science Plan for the North Pacific Research Board Get This Book
×
 Final Comments on the Science Plan for the North Pacific Research Board
Buy Paperback | $21.00 Buy Ebook | $16.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The North Pacific Research Board (NPRB) was established by Congress in 1997 to recommend marine research activities to the Secretary of Commerce on or relating to the fisheries or marine ecosystem in the North Pacific Ocean, Bering Sea, Arctic Ocean, and related bodies of water. NPRB called on the National Academies to develop a comprehensive long range science plan pertaining to its research activities. This assistance has been provided in two phases. In phase one, beginning in early 2003, a National Academies committee worked to understand the purpose of the NPRB, gather information to help identify research needs, and provide advice on the components of a sound science plan. The committee's assessment is contained in a report released in early 2004, Elements of a Science Plan for the North Pacific Research Board. With this guidance as a tool, the NPRB staff, Science Panel, and Advisory Panel worked together to write a draft science plan to steer the program in the coming decade. During the second phase, the same committee reviewed the NPRB's draft science plan and provided final feedback to the NPRB. It is a focused review, generally following the organization of the NPRB document. This report is intended primarily as a direct communication from the committee to those planning the NPRB's programs, to help them improve the science plan and ensure successful implementation.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!