National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$49.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

The Smallpox Vaccination Program: Public Health in an Age of Terrorism (2005)
Board on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention (HPDP)

Citation Manager

. "3 The Implementation of the Smallpox Vaccination Program." The Smallpox Vaccination Program: Public Health in an Age of Terrorism. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
58
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


The Smallpox Vaccination Program: Public Health in an Age of Terrorism

there was nearly complete silence on the part of the federal government about the status and future of this biopreparedness program; no official update of program progress or impact had been provided (see additional discussion in Chapter 4).

NOTEWORTHY FEATURES OF THE PROGRAM

Congressional Interest and Involvement

Members of Congress contributed to the smallpox vaccination program at various points in its evolution, from policy development to evaluation. Some policy-makers contributed to the early discussion of policy options. In the weeks and months before the smallpox vaccination program was announced, Senators Bill Frist and Judd Gregg and others publicly urged the government to consider making smallpox vaccine available to all Americans to facilitate individual choice (Frist, 2002; Gregg, 2002; McKenna, 2003). Several congressional committees and subcommittees held hearings on the subjects of smallpox vaccination and bioterrorism preparedness beginning soon after the September 11, 2001, attacks. Testimony before Congress as early as October 2001 (ASTHO, 2001) informed legislators about the need for a smallpox response plan, the need for additional resources, the need for a compensation mechanism for injuries associated with smallpox vaccination, and problems in the implementation of the program (NGA, 2003; U.S. House of Representatives, 2004). For example, at a July 2003 hearing of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, members of the Senate expressed concerns about the slow progress of smallpox vaccination and questioned federal officials about possible causes, including delays in finalizing the table of vaccine-related injuries that could be compensated under the new federal compensation provisions (Heil, 2003). Congress also played an important role in moving the legislation to provide a comprehensive plan for compensation of people injured by smallpox vaccine (Rath and Turcotte, 2003).

Finally, members of Congress asked GAO to evaluate progress in the smallpox vaccination program; this led to the April 2003 report described above (GAO, 2003). In January 2004, a year after the beginning of smallpox vaccination, some members of Congress issued a report that critiqued the smallpox vaccination program and called for changes to ensure and strengthen smallpox preparedness (U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee, 2004).

Page
58