National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$60.25
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Water Conservation, Reuse, and Recycling: Proceedings of an Iranian-American Workshop (2005)

Citation Manager

. "Small and Decentralized Systems for Wastewater Treatment and Reuse--Kara L. Nelson." Water Conservation, Reuse, and Recycling: Proceedings of an Iranian-American Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
55
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Water Conservation, Reuse, and Recycling: Proceedings of an Iranian-American Workshop

businesses, and recreational facilities rely on onsite wastewater systems, which serve approximately 60 million people (USEPA, 2002) (Table 1). About one-third of new homes rely on onsite systems. The fraction of the population served by onsite systems varies widely throughout the country, with the highest fraction, 55 percent, served in Vermont, and the lowest fraction, 10 percent, served in California. It is now recognized that the fraction of the population served by onsite systems in the United States is not likely to decrease (it has not changed significantly in the past three decades), because providing centralized collection and treatment for these dispersed populations is not economically feasible.

Unfortunately, many onsite wastewater systems are failing, due to inappropriate siting, design, or maintenance (USEPA, 2002). Failing onsite systems are recognized as sources of both groundwater and surface water contamination, posing a risk to public health (due to the presence of pathogens and nitrate) and the ecological health of lakes, rivers, and estuaries (due to nutrients that cause eutrophication). The regulation of onsite systems is currently undergoing important changes, and stricter and more uniform design and performance standards are expected in the future. Many existing systems will likely be required to upgrade.

The systems that are used for the onsite treatment and disposal of wastewater in the United States typically require substantial land area. As a result, communities with a higher population density tend to have centralized collection systems that transport the wastewater to a centralized treatment plant. However, there is no specific total population, or population density, at which it is necessary to provide a sewer system. Some communities that have historically relied on onsite treatment are now installing sewer systems. For example, Chico, California, with a population of 64,000, is beginning the installation of a sewer system that will collect the wastewater for about two-thirds of its population (the rest will continue to use onsite systems), with the aim to reduce nitrate contamination of groundwater.

TABLE 1 Total U.S. Population, Population Served by Onsite Wastewater Treatment, and Population Living in Small Communities

Type of Wastewater Management

Population (millions)

Percent of Total

2001 U.S. population

285

 

Onsite (individual household)

 

 

Population served

60

23

(No. of households)

(26)

(23)

Small communities

 

 

<10,000

29

10

<50,000

74

26

<100,000

100

35

Page
55
Front Matter (R1-R12)
WATER MANAGEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES AND IRANWater Management, Conservation, and Reuse in the Western United States--Henry Vaux, Jr. (1-17)
Overview of Water Management in Iran--Reza Ardakanian (18-34)
TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIESLarge Scale Systems--Stephen M. Lacy (35-53)
Small and Decentralized Systems for Wastewater Treatment and Reuse--Kara L. Nelson (54-66)
Solar Desalination for Domestic Applications--Mehdi N. Bahadori (67-78)
AGRICULTURAL WATER USE AND DROUGHT MANAGEMENTOptimal Irrigation: Considerations for Semiarid Regions--John Letey (79-93)
Status of Agricultural Water Use in Iran--Amin Alizadeh and Abbas Keshavarz (94-105)
Agricultural Drought Management in Iran--Sayed-Farhad Mousavi (106-113)
Coping with Drought--John Letey (114-119)
The Economics of Agricultural Water Use and the Role of Prices--David Sunding (120-152)
Water Allocation and Pricing in Agriculture of Iran--Abbas Keshavarz, Shahram Ashraft, Nader Hydari, Morteza Pouran, and Ezzat-Allah Farzaneh (153-172)
MUNICIPAL WATER USESt. Petersburg, Florida, Dual Water System: A Case Study--James Crook (173-186)
Monterey County Water Recycling Projects: A Case Study--James Crook and Robert S. Jaques (187-198)
Identifying Microbial and Chemical Contaminants for Regulatory Purposes: Lessons Learned in the United States--Rebecca T. Parkin (199-216)
Integrated Approach to Water and Wastewater Management for Tehran, Iran--Massoud Tajrishy and Ahmad Abrishamchi (217-230)
INTERBASIN WATER TRANSFERInterbasin Water Transfers in the Western United States: Issues and Lessons--David H. Getches (231-251)
Interbasin Water Transfers in Iran--Ahmad Abrishamchi and Massoud Tajrishy (252-272)
Appendix A--Workshop Agenda (273-278)
Appendix B--Workshop Participants List (279-280)