|
Description of Study |
Evidence Class (Comments) |
Results |
Reference |
|
Multicenter, double-blind randomized trial comparing different MP doses (1,000 versus 100 mg/d for 11 d) for treatment of 330 ASCI patients (NASCIS I study) |
III (study design, data presentation, interpretation, and analysis flaws) |
No treatment effect at 6 wk and 6 mo postinjury, no control group |
Bracken et al. (1984) |
|
1-yr follow-up of NASCIS I study |
III (study design, data presentation, interpretation, and analysis flaws) |
No significant difference in neurological recovery of motor or sensory function at 1 yr postinjury |
Bracken et al. (1985) |
|
Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing MP treatment with naloxone and placebo treatment in 487 patients (NASCIS II study) |
III (study design, data presentation, interpretation, and analysis flaws) |
Significant improvement in motor change scores (P = 0.03) and sensation change scores (P = 0.02) at 6 mo postinjury for patients treated with MP within 8 h of injury |
Bracken et al. (1990) |
|
1-yr follow-up of NASCIS II study |
III (study design, data presentation, interpretation, and analysis flaws) |
Significant improvement in motor change scores 1 yr postinjury for patients treated with MP within 8 h of injury (P = 0.03); administration of MP was detrimental if it was given more than 8 h after injury |
Bracken et al. (1992) |