Questions? Call 800-624-6242 About | Ordering | New Menu | Items in cart [0] SEARCH

PAPERBACK price:$41.00 add to cart Rights & Permissions Free PDF Access Sign in to download PDF book and chapters Free Resources PDF SUMMARY PDF Report Brief Display this book on your site! Related Titles Prospective Evaluation of Applied Energy Research and Development at DOE (Phase Two) Energy Research at DOE: Was It Worth It? Energy Efficiency and Fossil Energy Research 1978 to 2000 Other Related Titles Prospective Evaluation of Applied Energy Research and Development at DOE (Phase One): A First Look Forward (2005) Board on Energy and Environmental Systems (BEES) Citation Manager Export the bibliographic data for this book in your chosen format Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web. Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book. Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic. Citation Manager . "Appendix C: Presentations and Committee Meetings." Prospective Evaluation of Applied Energy Research and Development at DOE (Phase One): A First Look Forward. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005. Please select a format: Page 60   E-mail Share on facebook Facebook Share on delicious Delicious Share on stumbleupon Stumble Share on twitter Twitter More Sharing ServicesMore The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. C Presentations and Committee Meetings Committee Meeting, The National Academies, Washington, D.C., February 10-11, 2004 Results of the Conference on Estimating Benefits of Government-Sponsored Energy R&D Russell Lee, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Estimating Benefits of DOE’s Applied R&D: OMB Perspective and Interest Robert Sandoli, Office of Management and Budget Program Planning at NIST Paul Doremus, National Institute of Standards and Technology Estimating Prospective Energy R&D Benefits Jay Braitsch and Mary Beth Zimmerman, U.S. Department of Energy How the Science Committee Looks at DOE’s Applied R&D Portfolio Kevin Carroll, House Subcommittee on Energy A Skeptical View of DOE R&D (Time to Overhaul Federal Energy R&D) Ronald Sutherland, Consulting Economist Committee Meeting, The National Academies, Washington, D.C., April 14-15, 2004 Closed session Panel on Benefits of Lighting R&D Subcommittee Meeting, The National Academies, Washington, D.C., July 8-9, 2004 LED Status and the Potential for Solid State Lighting M.G. Craford, Lumileds Lighting, LLC DOE Solid State Lighting Program James R. Brodrick, U.S. Department of Energy Estimating Benefits of the DOE Solid State Lighting Program Frances Wood, OnLocation, Inc. Lighting Design and Lighting Designers Terry McGowan, Lighting Research Office Panel on Benefits of Sequestration R&D Subcommittee Meeting, The National Academies, Washington, D.C., July 12-13, 2004 U.S. DOE Carbon Sequestration Program Scott Klara, National Energy Technology Laboratory Estimating Benefits for the Sequestration Subprogram Darren Mollot, U.S. Department of Energy Estimating Benefits for the Carbon Sequestration R&D Program: Key Questions Jay Braitsch, U.S. Department of Energy Committee Meeting, The National Academies, Washington, D.C., July 19-20, 2004 Benefits Analysis Methodologies Sam Baldwin, Jay Braitsch, Allan Hoffman, Darren Mollot, MaryBeth Zimmerman, U.S. Department of Energy Panel on Benefits of Fuel Cell R&D Subcommittee Meeting, The National Academies, Washington, D.C., July 20-21, 2004 Fuel Cell Subprogram Patrick Davis, Kathi Epping, John Garbak, Nancy Garland, Donna Ho, Valri Lightner, Amy Manheim, U.S. Department of Energy Overview of DOE FE Fuel Cell Program Mark C. Williams, National Energy Technology Laboratory Page 60 Front Matter (R1-R12) Executive Summary (1-5) 1 Introduction (6-8) 2 From Retrospective to Prospective Evaluation (9-12) 3 Methodology for Prospective Evaluation of Department of Energy Programs (13-31) 4 Expert Panel Process (32-37) 5 Results of Applying the Methodology (38-47) 6 Conclusions and Recommendations (48-51) References (52-52) Appendix A: Committee Biographical Information (53-58) Appendix B: Statement of Task (59-59) Appendix C: Presentations and Committee Meetings (60-61) Appendix D: Letter Report (62-69) Appendix E: Prospective Evaluation of DOE Programs: A Preliminary Methodology (70-74) Appendix F: Report of the Panel on Benefits of Lighting R&D (75-88) Appendix G: Report of the Panel of Sequestration R&D (89-101) Appendix H: Report of the Panel of Benefits of Fuel Cell R&D (102-119) Appendix I: The Lighting Cse Study Recast as a Decision Tree (120-120) Appendix J: Expected Benefits Results and Report Guidance (121-123) Appendix K: Information Request to the Department of Energy (124-126)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 60
Prospective Evaluation of Applied Energy Research and Development at DOE (Phase One): A First Look Forward C Presentations and Committee Meetings Committee Meeting, The National Academies, Washington, D.C., February 10-11, 2004 Results of the Conference on Estimating Benefits of Government-Sponsored Energy R&D Russell Lee, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Estimating Benefits of DOE’s Applied R&D: OMB Perspective and Interest Robert Sandoli, Office of Management and Budget Program Planning at NIST Paul Doremus, National Institute of Standards and Technology Estimating Prospective Energy R&D Benefits Jay Braitsch and Mary Beth Zimmerman, U.S. Department of Energy How the Science Committee Looks at DOE’s Applied R&D Portfolio Kevin Carroll, House Subcommittee on Energy A Skeptical View of DOE R&D (Time to Overhaul Federal Energy R&D) Ronald Sutherland, Consulting Economist Committee Meeting, The National Academies, Washington, D.C., April 14-15, 2004 Closed session Panel on Benefits of Lighting R&D Subcommittee Meeting, The National Academies, Washington, D.C., July 8-9, 2004 LED Status and the Potential for Solid State Lighting M.G. Craford, Lumileds Lighting, LLC DOE Solid State Lighting Program James R. Brodrick, U.S. Department of Energy Estimating Benefits of the DOE Solid State Lighting Program Frances Wood, OnLocation, Inc. Lighting Design and Lighting Designers Terry McGowan, Lighting Research Office Panel on Benefits of Sequestration R&D Subcommittee Meeting, The National Academies, Washington, D.C., July 12-13, 2004 U.S. DOE Carbon Sequestration Program Scott Klara, National Energy Technology Laboratory Estimating Benefits for the Sequestration Subprogram Darren Mollot, U.S. Department of Energy Estimating Benefits for the Carbon Sequestration R&D Program: Key Questions Jay Braitsch, U.S. Department of Energy Committee Meeting, The National Academies, Washington, D.C., July 19-20, 2004 Benefits Analysis Methodologies Sam Baldwin, Jay Braitsch, Allan Hoffman, Darren Mollot, MaryBeth Zimmerman, U.S. Department of Energy Panel on Benefits of Fuel Cell R&D Subcommittee Meeting, The National Academies, Washington, D.C., July 20-21, 2004 Fuel Cell Subprogram Patrick Davis, Kathi Epping, John Garbak, Nancy Garland, Donna Ho, Valri Lightner, Amy Manheim, U.S. Department of Energy Overview of DOE FE Fuel Cell Program Mark C. Williams, National Energy Technology Laboratory

OCR for page 61
Prospective Evaluation of Applied Energy Research and Development at DOE (Phase One): A First Look Forward Estimating Benefits of EERE Fuel Cell R&D Philip Patterson, DOE/EERE; Frances Wood, OnLocation, Inc.; Chip Friley, Brookhaven National Laboratory Estimating Benefits for the Fuel Cell Subprogram Darren Mollot, U.S. Department of Energy U.S. DOE FE Fuel Cell Program Sam Biondo, U.S. Department of Energy Panel on Benefits of Lighting R&D Subcommittee Meeting, The National Academies, Washington, D.C., August 2-3, 2004 Additional Material on Estimating Benefits of the DOE Lighting Program Frances Wood, OnLocation, Inc. DOE Lighting Research and Development Program: Conventional Lighting James R. Brodrick, U.S. Department of Energy Panel on Benefits of Fuel Cell R&D Subcommittee Meeting, The National Academies, Washington, D.C., August 18-19, 2004 DOE Hydrogen Program: Systems Analysis Workshop Steve Chalk, U.S. Department of Energy Recent Progress Related to Benefits Analysis Steve Chalk, U.S. Department of Energy Panel on Benefits of Sequestration R&D Subcommittee Meeting, The National Academies, Washington, D.C., September 23-24, 2004 Closed session Committee Meeting, The National Academies, Irvine, California, October 20-23, 2004 Closed session Committee Meeting, The National Academies, Washington, D.C., January 10-11, 2005 Closed session

Representative terms from entire chapter:

low acceptance