National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$43.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Policy Implications of International Graduate Students and Postdoctoral Scholars in the United States (2005)
Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP)

Citation Manager

. "3 The Globalization of Science and Engineering." Policy Implications of International Graduate Students and Postdoctoral Scholars in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
109
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Policy Implications of International Graduate Students and Postdoctoral Scholars in the United States

FIGURE 3-4 Percent distribution of US R&D funding, by sector.

SOURCE: National Science Foundation. 2003. Academic Research and Development Expenditures: Fiscal Year 2001 (NSF 03-316). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; NSF/SRS, WebCASPAR database system, http://caspar.nsf.gov.

There is some evidence that at least some groups of first-generation Americans may be more likely to enter S&E and this may ease the demographic shift.91

Levels of Public Funding

With the increase in international graduate-student enrollment has come a shift in how that research is funded. R&D funding has risen over the years, but the sectors providing the funding are altering their relative contributions. The proportion of funding for research provided by the federal government has declined from about 70 percent in the 1970s to 60 percent in the 1990s while the proportion provided by academic institutions, business, and nonprofits has increased (see Figure 3-4).

Although decreased availability or stagnation of federal academic research funds disproportionately affects temporary residents and can affect graduate-student enrollments92 (see Figure 3-5), the important role of the

91  

Thomas MaCurdy, Thomas Nechyba, and Jay Bhattacharya. 1998. “An economic framework for assessing the fiscal impacts of immigration.” In: The Immigration Debate: Studies in the Economic, Demographic and Fiscal Effects of Immigration. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 13-65.

92  

National Research Council. 2001. Trends in Federal Support of Research and Graduate Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Page
109