Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 203
America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science Appendixes
OCR for page 204
America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science This page intentionally left blank.
OCR for page 205
America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science APPENDIX A Agendas of Fact-Finding Meetings FIRST FACT-FINDING MEETING March 29-30, 2004 Monday, March 29 Open Session 10:10 a.m. Welcome Martin Orland, director, Center for Education, National Research Council (NRC) Jean Moon, director, Board on Science Education, NRC 10:20 a.m. Discussion of the Charge with the Sponsor Janice Earle, senior program director, Division of Elementary, Secondary, and Informal Education, National Science Foundation (NSF) James Lightbourne, senior advisor, NSF Directorate for Education and Human Resources 10:45 a.m. Discovery Learning and Discovery Teaching David Hammer, professor, University of Maryland
OCR for page 206
America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science 11:45 a.m. Lunch 12:45 p.m. High School Science Laboratories: Data from the 2000 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education Sean Smith, senior research associate, Horizon Research, Inc. 1:30 p.m. Panel Discussion with National Leaders in Science Education Gerald F. Wheeler, executive director, National Science Teachers Association Warren W. Hein, associate executive officer, American Association of Physics Teachers Angela Powers, senior education associate, teacher training, American Chemical Society Michael J. Smith, education director, American Geological Institute The panelists will address the following topics: The current role of labs in high school science education; Resources the association provides to assist teachers with labs; and A vision for the future of high school labs. 2:45 p.m. Break 3:00 p.m. History of High School Science Curriculum Development Janet Carlson-Powell, associate director, Biological Sciences Curriculum Study 4:00 p.m. Open Session Adjourns Tuesday, March 30 10:15 a.m. History of NSF Programs to Improve High School Science Gerhard Salinger, program director, Division of Elementary, Secondary, and Informal Education, NSF
OCR for page 207
America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science 10:45 a.m. Technology and High School Science Robert Tinker, president, The Concord Consortium 11:45 a.m. Lunch 1:00 p.m. Project 2061 Evaluation of Science Texts and Supporting Materials Jo Ellen Roseman, director, American Association for the Advancement of Science Project 2061 George DeBoer, deputy director, AAAS Project 2061 2:00 p.m. Open Session Adjourns SECOND FACT-FINDING MEETING June 3-4, 2004 Thursday, June 3 Open Session 9:00 a.m. Welcome Jean Moon, director, Board on Science Education Susan Singer, chair, Committee on High School Labs 9:15 a.m. The Nature of Science and Scientific Research: Implications for High School Science Laboratories Jane Maienschein, Arizona State University Questions speaker will address: Briefly sketch the points of agreement and disagreement in current thinking about the nature of science (NOS) and how scientists work. How can these views of NOS and how scientists work inform the goals and design of science education? More specifically, how should/can this understanding inform the design of high school science lab experiences and their role in science education?
OCR for page 208
America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science 9:30 a.m. Discussion of Presentation 10:00 a.m. Break 10:10 a.m. Definition of Labs and Their Role in Science Education Robin Millar, University of York (UK) Questions speaker will address: Outline your definition of laboratory work and the analytic framework that drives this definition. Under this definition, what distinguishes laboratory work from other aspects of instruction in science? How does inquiry fit into your definition? Given your definition of laboratory work, what unique role does the laboratory play in supporting students’ learning in science? Or, put another way, what would be the consequences for students’ learning in science if laboratory experiences, as you have defined them, were eliminated? What factors must be considered in determining the effectiveness of laboratory experiences? To what extent is it possible to derive a common set of characteristics of lab experiences that can be considered “good” or “effective” across a range of different learning goals and content areas? What are the most effective or most useful assessments of student learning in laboratory contexts? 10:30 a.m. Discussion of Presentation 11:00 a.m. How Financial and Resource Issues Constrain or Enable Laboratory Activities James Guthrie, Vanderbilt University Arthur Lidsky, Dober, Lidsky, Craig and Associates Questions speakers will address: How do finances and other resources (including the costs of teacher training, space, equipment, technician support for teachers) enable or constrain
OCR for page 209
America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science high school laboratory space, equipment, and activities? What is the range of lab experiences that schools with different levels of resources (including financial resources, lab space, lab equipment, and technology) provide? How should the physical and/or virtual laboratory be designed? What should it look like? 11:30 a.m. Panel Discussion of Finances and Resources (each panelist will give 5 min opening comments) Daniel Gohl, principal, McKinley Technical High School, DC Public Schools Shelley Lee, science education consultant, Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Lynda Beck, former assistant head of school, Phillips Exeter Academy Kim Lee, science curriculum supervisor, Montgomery County Public Schools, VA 12:00 p.m. General Discussion (questions from committee and audience) 12:30 p.m. Lunch 1:30 p.m. Organization and Administration of Schools to Sustain Instructional Improvement Adam Gamoran, University of Wisconsin Questions speaker will address: What factors in the organization and administration of high schools and in education more generally enable sustained improvement in science instruction (including laboratory experiences)? What kinds of changes might be needed in the organization and administration of high schools to enhance the effectiveness of science labs? 1:50 p.m. Discussion of Presentation
OCR for page 210
America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science 2:20 pm. Panel Discussion of School Leadership to Support Laboratory Experiences (each panelist will give 5 min opening comments) Daniel Gohl, McKinley Technical High School, DC Public Schools Shelley Lee, science education consultant, Wisconsin Department of Education Kim Lee, science curriculum supervisor, Montgomery County Public Schools, VA Questions panelists will address: What sort of leadership is needed from the science department, from the school principal, and from the state to support sustained improvement in laboratory instruction? How can science teachers, state and local administrators, and outside organizations (e.g., scientists) develop relationships that enable and sustain quality laboratory instruction? 2:50 p.m. Questions from Committee and Audience 3:15 p.m. Open Session Adjourns Friday, June 4 Open Session 9:00 a.m. How Students Learn Science in Different Forms of Laboratory Experience: Focus on Technology Marcia Linn, University of California Berkeley Questions speaker will address: What do we know about the role of technology (in all of its forms) in science learning? What are the unique contributions that technology can make to science learning? What does the evidence about students’ learning and technology imply for developing a vision for the role of high school laboratories in science education? 9:20 a.m. Discussion of Presentation
OCR for page 211
America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science 10:00 a.m. Break 10:15 a.m. How Teachers Learn and Work—Specifically Related to Labs Kefyn Catley, Vanderbilt University Mark Windschitl, University of Washington Questions speakers will address: What knowledge and skills are required to successfully design and carry out different forms of laboratory experiences? To what extent do teachers’ current preparation and professional development provide them with these knowledge and skills? 11:00 a.m. Questions from Committee and Audience 11:30 a.m. Lunch 12:30 p.m. State Science Standards and Laboratory Assessment in New York: A Case Study Audrey Champagne, SUNY Buffalo Thomas Shiland, Saratoga Springs High School 1:00 p.m. Science Standards and Assessment Across the 50 States Arthur Halbrook, Council of Chief State School Officers 1:30 p.m. Discussion of Presentations Questions speakers will address: What are the challenges in assessing students’ learning from laboratory experiences? What is the current state of state standards and assessment practices and how do they constrain or enable what can be done in labs? 2:15 p.m. Open Session Adjourns
OCR for page 212
America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science THIRD FACT-FINDING MEETING July 12-13, 2004 Monday, July 12 Open Session 9:30 a.m. Coffee Break 9:40 a.m. How Students Learn Science: The Role of Laboratories Philip Bell, University of Washington Richard Duschl, Rutgers University Norman Lederman, Illinois Institute of Technology Questions speakers will address: What does the research evidence suggest is the unique contribution of labs to students’ learning in science? Put another way, what would be the consequences for students’ learning in science if laboratory experiences were eliminated? Include in your response some discussion of content versus process goals and the extent to which these can be considered separately. What key principles can be drawn from our knowledge of students’ learning in labs and science learning in general to guide both the design of future laboratory experiences and how they are integrated into the overall flow of science instruction? To what extent are these design principles shaped by which broad goals for science education are considered highest priority (for example, motivating students to continue learning science vs. training future scientists vs. developing science literacy for all)? 10:40 a.m. Discussion of Presentations 11:30 a.m. Lunch 12:30 p.m. How Students Learn Science: Diverse Learners and Labs Okhee Lee, University of Miami (by speakerphone) Sharon Lynch, George Washington University Kenneth Tobin, City University of New York
OCR for page 213
America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science 1:45 p.m. Discussion of Presentations Questions speakers will address: Do students of varying backgrounds (SES, ethnicity, language, disability, gender) have equal access to laboratory experiences? If not, what are the factors that lead to unequal access and what are the consequences for students’ learning in science and the pathways in education and employment available to them? Do students of varying backgrounds learn science more effectively through laboratory experiences? Do labs motivate students of varying backgrounds to continue science education? If so, is this because labs help students see themselves as part of a “community of learners” in scientific discovery? How should future laboratory experiences be designed and delivered in order to reach students of varying backgrounds? 2:30 p.m. Students’ Pathways in Science: Labs and Workforce Skills Samuel Stringfield, Johns Hopkins University 3:15 p.m. Break 3:30 p.m. Students’ Pathways: Labs for Biotechnology Careers Ellyn Daugherty, San Mateo High School, San Mateo, CA Elaine Johnson, San Francisco Community College and Bio-Link Questions speakers will address: What pathways in education and employment do high school science students follow? What is the role of technical education and the business community in enhancing the effectiveness of high school labs? What is the role of laboratory experiences in helping students pursue alternative pathways in education and employment? 4:20 p.m. Discussion of Presentations 5:00 p.m. Adjourn for the Day
OCR for page 214
America’s Lab Report: Investigations in High School Science Tuesday, July 13 Open Session 8:30 a.m. Students’ Pathways: High School Labs and College Achievement Philip Sadler, Harvard University Robert Tai, University of Virginia 9:00 a.m. Discussion of Presentation 9:45 a.m. How Master Teachers Design and Carry Out Laboratory Experiences Nina Hike-Teague, Curie High School, Chicago, IL Gertrude Kerr, Howard High School, Howard County, MD Margot Murphy, George’s Valley High School, ME Phil Sumida, Maine West High School, Des Plaines, IL Robert Willis, Ballou High School, Washington, DC Questions panelists will address: Why and how do you incorporate laboratory experiences into instruction? How would you describe your specific learning goals for students in labs or lab-like situations? What are the biggest challenges to incorporating lab experiences into your instruction and could you provide a short example of how you deal with what you see as the most critical challenge? 11:15 a.m. Open Session Adjourns
Representative terms from entire chapter: