American Federation of Teachers. (2001). Making standards matter 2001. Washington, DC: Author.

Archibald, D.A. (1998, July). The reviews of state content standards in English language arts and mathematics: A summary and review of their methods and findings and implications for future standards development. Paper commissioned by the National Educational Goals Panel. Available: [accessed June 2005].

Ayala, C.C., Yin, Y., Shavelson, R.J., and Vanides J. (2002). Investigating the cognitive validity of science performance assessment with think alouds: Technical aspects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.

Baker, E.L. (1997). Model-based performance assessment. Theory into Practice, 36, 247–254.

Baker, E.L. (2003, Summer). Multiple measures: Toward tiered systems. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(2), 13–17.

Baker, E.L., Abedi, J., Linn, R.L., and Niemi, D. (1996). Dimensionality and generalizability of domain-independent performance assessments. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 197–205.

Baker, E.L., Linn, R.L. Herman, J.L., and Koretz, D. (2002). Standards for educational accountability systems. (Policy Brief No. 5). Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, University of California.

Baron, J.B. (1990). Performance assessment: Blurring the edges among assessment, curriculum, and instruction. In A.B. Champagne, B.E. Lovitts, and B.J. Calinger (Eds.), Assessment in the service of instruction: This year in school science 1990. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Baxter, G.P., and Glaser, R. (1998). Investigating the cognitive complexity of science assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 17, 37–45.

Baxter, G.P., Elder, A.D., and Glaser, R. (1996). Knowledge-based cognition and performance assessment in the science classroom. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 133–140.

Bejar, I.I. (1996). Generative response modeling: Leveraging the computer as a test delivery medium. (ETS Research Report No. 96–13). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Bennett, R. (1998). Reinventing assessment: Speculations on the future of large scale educational testing. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, Policy and Information Centre.

Bennett, R.E. (2002). Using electronic assessment to measure student performance. (Issue Brief). Washington, DC: NGA Center for Best Practices. Available: [accessed June 2005].

Blank, R., and Pechman, E. (1995). State curriculum frameworks in mathematics and science: How are they changing across the states? Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.

Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J.S., Guzdial, M., and Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 & 4), 369–398.

Bond, L. (2000). Good grades, low test scores: A study of the achievement gap in measures of quantitative reasoning. Paper presented at the Fifth Annual National Institute for Science Education Forum, May 22–23, Detroit, MI.

Borko, H., and Elliott, R. (1998). Tensions between competing pedagogical and accountability commitments for exemplary teachers of mathematics in Kentucky. (CSE Technical Report No. 495). Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, University of California.

Borko, H., and Stecher, B.M. (2001, April). Looking at reform through different methodological lenses: Survey and case studies of the Washington state education reform. Paper presented as part of the symposium Testing Policy and Teaching Practice: A Multimethod Examination of Two States at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.

Boston, C., Rudner, L., Walker, L., and Crouch, L. (Eds.). (2003). What reporters need to know about test scores. Washington, DC: Education Writers Association and ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.

Bransford, J.D. (1979). Human cognition: Learning, understanding, and remembering. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement