National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$62.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

An International Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage Facility -- Exploring a Russian Site as a Prototype: Proceedings of an International Workshop (2005)
Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC)

Citation Manager

. "Opening Remarks." An International Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage Facility -- Exploring a Russian Site as a Prototype: Proceedings of an International Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
1
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


An International Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage Facility: Exploring a Russian Site as a Prototype - Proceedings of an International Workshop

Opening Remarks

Milton Levenson

Bechtel International (retired)

I welcome all of you to this workshop. The topic we are to address in the next two days is extremely important and has significant long-range implications. At a time in history when war and terrorism fill our television programs and the headlines of our newspapers, it is not easy to focus on what are somewhat less urgent but perhaps in the long run equally important issues.

To help set the tone for our workshop I will first define the overall problem and then identify what role our workshop might play in developing a solution to the problem. The overall problem has two parts. The first part is to ensure that toxic materials do not enter the biosphere or environment in dangerous amounts. The second part is to ensure that fissionable materials are either controlled or destroyed so that irresponsible groups, including terrorists, cannot obtain critical quantities of weapons-usable material.

While science and technology may provide us with multiple options to address both parts of the problem, it is premature to select a single option for worldwide use. The development of technical options and the debate on risks versus benefits continues. The ultimate solution has not been selected. The first step, but a very important step, is to collect both fissionable material and other toxic materials and to provide secure storage until definitive solutions are decided upon. We all know that radioactive materials are not the only toxic materials; they are not even the most toxic materials, but our workshop will limit its scope to radioactive materials. Whether long-term storage becomes the method of disposal in the future, whether fissionable material is utilized or destroyed in the future, whether fission products and other radioactive materials are disposed of in geological repositories or transmuted into less dangerous materials in the future, these are all topics for future decisions. The topic of this workshop is how

Page
1
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Opening Remarks (1-2)
Handling Spent Nuclear Fuel—International Experience -- IAEA Activities in Nuclear Spent Fuel Management (3-11)
Analysis of U.S. Experience with Spent Fuel (12-19)
Problems of Spent Nuclear Fuel Management and Storage Site Selection (20-29)
Feasibility of Transmutation of Radioactive Elements (30-49)
The High Level Waste Disposal Technology Development Program in Korea (50-58)
The Use of Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactors for Effectively Reprocessing Plutonium and Minor Actinides (59-72)
Site Selection for Spent Fuel Storage and Disposal of High Level Waste -- Site Selection for Spent Fuel Storage and Disposal of High Level Waste: Experience of European Countries (73-88)
The Private Fuel Limited Liability Company National Spent Fuel Site (89-95)
Experience of Japan (96-108)
The Current Status of Spent Nuclear Fuel in Korea (109-117)
Safe Transport of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High Level Waste: International Experience (118-127)
Ensuring Nuclear and Radiation Safety During the Transport of Radioactive Materials in Russia (128-142)
Problems in Establishing an International Repository for Spent Nuclear Fuel in Russia -- Creating an Infrastructure for Managing of Spent Nuclear Fuel (143-151)
Current Status of Government Regulation of Activities Associated with the Import of Spent Nuclear Fuel into the Russian Federation Return to the Russian Federation of Irradiated Fuel Assemblies from the Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Republic of Uzbekistan (152-158)
Return to the Russian Federation of Irradiated Fuel Assemblies from the Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Republic of Uzbekistan (159-162)
Investment and International Aspects of the Problem of Spent Nuclear Fuel Management (163-165)
Creation of an Underground Repository for Spent Nuclear Fuel near the City of Zheleznogorsk (Eastern Siberia) (166-176)
Conditions for the Creation of an International Spent Nuclear Fuel Repository near the Priargunsk Mining-Chemical Production Association (City of Krasnokamensk, Chita Oblast) (177-186)
Utilization of High-Level Waste -- Types of High-Level Radioactive Wastes Formed as a Result of Dry Methods of Spent Fuel Regeneration and Technologies for their Management (187-198)
Chemical Treatment of High Level Waste for Utilization (199-207)
Immobilization of High Level Waste: Analysis of Appropriate Synthetic Waste Forms (208-224)
The Management of High-Level Radioactive Wastes from the Mayak Production Association and Plans for the Creation of an Underground Laboratory (225-239)
Creation of Underground Laboratories at the Mining-Chemical Complex and at Mayak to Study the Suitability of Sites for Underground Isolation of Radioactive Wastes (240-247)
Concluding Observations--Milton Levenson (248-250)
Appendix A: Workshop Agenda (251-256)
Appendix B: Environmental Effects of Radiation in the Russian Federation (257-259)
Appendix C: Geochemistry of Actinides During the Long-Term Storage and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel (260-290)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 1
An International Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage Facility: Exploring a Russian Site as a Prototype - Proceedings of an International Workshop Opening Remarks Milton Levenson Bechtel International (retired) I welcome all of you to this workshop. The topic we are to address in the next two days is extremely important and has significant long-range implications. At a time in history when war and terrorism fill our television programs and the headlines of our newspapers, it is not easy to focus on what are somewhat less urgent but perhaps in the long run equally important issues. To help set the tone for our workshop I will first define the overall problem and then identify what role our workshop might play in developing a solution to the problem. The overall problem has two parts. The first part is to ensure that toxic materials do not enter the biosphere or environment in dangerous amounts. The second part is to ensure that fissionable materials are either controlled or destroyed so that irresponsible groups, including terrorists, cannot obtain critical quantities of weapons-usable material. While science and technology may provide us with multiple options to address both parts of the problem, it is premature to select a single option for worldwide use. The development of technical options and the debate on risks versus benefits continues. The ultimate solution has not been selected. The first step, but a very important step, is to collect both fissionable material and other toxic materials and to provide secure storage until definitive solutions are decided upon. We all know that radioactive materials are not the only toxic materials; they are not even the most toxic materials, but our workshop will limit its scope to radioactive materials. Whether long-term storage becomes the method of disposal in the future, whether fissionable material is utilized or destroyed in the future, whether fission products and other radioactive materials are disposed of in geological repositories or transmuted into less dangerous materials in the future, these are all topics for future decisions. The topic of this workshop is how

OCR for page 2
An International Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage Facility: Exploring a Russian Site as a Prototype - Proceedings of an International Workshop to start the process by collecting these materials in centralized, secure locations so that the risk they might pose to society can be minimized while ultimate solutions are developed, debated, and then implemented. Our challenge for the next two days is to discuss the issues that must be resolved before we can be assured that the nuclear material now in temporary storage in many locations throughout the world has been placed in safe and secure storage. This is especially important for the smaller temporary sites where the cost per fuel unit of waste to ensure safety is very high because of the relatively small amounts of material involved. A centralized storage facility is certainly an attractive option for such material and that really is the focus of our workshop. We have invited speakers to cover the technical, policy, and legal issues of such a centralized facility. This is to be a workshop to illuminate the issues. No attempt will be made to resolve the issues, nor will an attempt be made to obtain a consensus. Our objective is to define what needs to be done as the next step in moving toward a solution—and identifying what might be some of the options for doing so. We will be successful if in the end we have provided elements and options for a solution that can be used by the decision makers in resolving the problem.

Representative terms from entire chapter:

radioactive materials