National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$27.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Improving Evaluation of Anticrime Programs (2005)
Committee on Law and Justice (CLAJ)

Citation Manager

. "3 When Is an Impact Evaluation Appropriate?." Improving Evaluation of Anticrime Programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
33
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Improving Evaluation of Anticrime Programs

Site Visit

  • Is the project being implemented as advertised?

  • What is the intervention to be evaluated?

  • What outcomes could be assessed? By what measures?

  • Are there valid comparison groups?

  • Is random assignment possible?

  • What threats to a sound evaluation are most likely to occur?

  • Are there hidden strengths in the project?

  • What are the sizes and characteristics of the target populations?

  • How is the target population identified (i.e., what are eligibility criteria)? Who/what gets excluded as a target?

  • Have the characteristics of the target population changed over time?

  • How large would target and comparison samples be after one year of observation?

  • What would the target population receive in a comparison sample?

  • What are the shortcomings/gaps in delivering the intervention?

  • What do recipients of the intervention think the project does?

  • How do they assess the services received?

  • What kinds of data elements are available from existing data sources?

  • What specific input, process, and outcome measures would they support?

  • How complete are data records? Can you get samples?

  • What routine reports are produced?

  • Can target populations be followed over time?

  • Can services delivered be identified?

  • Can systems help diagnose implementation problems?

  • Does staff tell consistent stories about the project?

  • Are their backgrounds appropriate for the project’s activities?

  • What do partners provide/receive?

  • How integral to project success are the partners?

  • What changes is the director willing to make to support the evaluation?

Page
33