The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Improving Evaluation of Anticrime Programs
2002b Justice Impact Evaluations: One Byrne Evaluation Was Rigorous; All Reviewed Violence Against Women Office Evaluations Were Problematic. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
2002c Violence Against Women Office: Problems with Grant Monitoring and Concerns about Evaluation Studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
2003a Justice Outcome Evaluations: Design and Implementation of Studies Require More NIJ Attention. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
2003b Program Evaluation: An Evaluation Culture and Collaborative Partnerships Help Build Agency Capacity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Wagenaar, A. 1999 Communities mobilizing for change on alcohol. Journal of Community Psychology 27(3):315-326.
Weisburd, D. 2003 Ethical practice and evaluation of interventions in crime and justice: The moral imperative for randomized trials. Evaluation Review 27(3):336-354.
Weisburd, D., and F. Taxman 2000 Developing a multicenter randomized trial in criminology: The case of HIDTA. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 16(3):315-340.
Weisburd, D., A. Petrosino, and G. Mason 1993 Design sensitivity in criminal justice experiments. In M. Tonry (ed.) Crime and Justice: A Review of Research (vol. 17). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Weisburd, D., C.M. Lum, and S.M. Yang 2002 When can we conclude that treatments or programs don’t work? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 587:31-48.
Wholey, J.S. 1994 Assessing the feasibility and likely usefulness of evaluation. Pp. 15-39 in J.S. Wholey, H.P. Hatry, and K.E. Newcomer (eds.). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.