Click for next page ( 392


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 391
Appendix E Glossary The terminology required for a comprehensive discussion of the rela- tionship between vehicle speed and safety has specific technical con- notations that may differ from the meanings of these words in the vernacular. This glossary describes several terms associated with vehi- cle speeds on streets and highways, and with highway and traffic engineering. Speed parameters customarily expressed in miles per hour (mph) are cited in these units in this glossary (1 mph = 1.609 km/h). 10-mph Pace The 10-mph pace is the 10-mph range encompassing the greatest percentage of all the measured speeds in a spot speed study. It is described by the speed value at the lower end of the range and the percentage of all vehicles that are within the range; as such, it is an alternative indicator of speed dispersion. Most engineers believe that 391

OCR for page 391
MANAGING SPEED 392 safety is enhanced when the 10-mph pace includes a large percentage (more than 70 percent) of all the free-flowing vehicles at a location. (Note: 10 mph = 16 km/h.) 85th Percentile Speed The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the free-flowing vehi- cles travel. Traffic engi- neers have assumed that this high percentage of drivers will select a safe speed on the basis of the Figure E-1 Eighty-fifth percentile speed. conditions at the site. The 85th percentile speed has traditionally been considered in an engineering study to establish a speed limit. The 85th percentile speed for a normal distribution is shown in Figure E-1. In most cases, the difference between the 85th percentile speed and the aver- age speed provides a good approximation of the speed sample's stan- dard deviation. Advisory Speed At certain locations on the highway sys- tem, such as horizontal curves, intersec- tions, or steep downgrades, the safe speed on the roadway may be less than the posted speed limit. Rather than lowering the regulatory speed limits at each of these locations, traffic engineers often place standard warning signs accompanied by a square black-and-yellow advisory speed Figure E-2 Advisory plate as shown in Figure E-2. Although speed plate. this sign provides a warning to approach- ing drivers, it is not legally enforceable.

OCR for page 391
393 Glossary Arterial Arterials provide the high-speed, high-volume network for travel between major points in rural areas. They generally have minimum design speeds of at least 37 mph (60 km/h). Most intersections are at grade (i.e., at the same level), and access to abutting property is per- mitted but controlled. Utilities are usually permitted within the right-of-way. All rural arterials, including freeways, constitute about 9 percent of the rural highway length in the United States and carry 64 percent of the rural vehicle miles of travel. The principal purpose of urban arterials is to provide mobility. Design speeds may be as low as 31 to 37 mph (50 to 60 km/h), but higher speeds are common, particularly for principal arterials. In developed areas, principal arterials are often spaced at intervals of 0.6 to 1.2 mi (1 to 2 km). Principal arterials, including freeways, account for 9 percent of the urban street length and carry 58 percent of all urban travel. Average Speed The average (or mean) speed is the most common measure of central tendency. Using data from a spot speed study, the average is calculated by summing all the measured speeds and dividing by the sample size, n. Basic Speed Law The Uniform Vehicle Code (National Committee on Uniform Traffic Laws and Ordinances 1992) and most state motor vehicle laws include a basic speed law with wording similar to the following: No person shall drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions and having regard for the weather, visibility, traffic, and the surface and width of the roadway. Braking Distance Braking distance, assumed for design purposes to be on a wet pave- ment surface, is the distance required to stop a vehicle from the

OCR for page 391
MANAGING SPEED 394 instant brake application begins. The minimum braking distance for a vehicle on a level roadway increases with the square of the speed: V2 b 254f where b braking distance (m), V initial speed (km/h), and f coefficient of friction between tires and roadway. The dashed line in Figure E-3 shows braking distance as a function of a vehicle's initial speed. The solid line shows the total stopping distance. Figure E-3 Design values for braking and stopping distance. (Note: 1 m = 3.28 ft and 1 km/h = 0.62 mph.) Business District For the purpose of establishing statutory speed limits, the Uniform Vehicle Code (National Committee on Uniform Traffic Laws and Ordinances 1992) defines a business district as the territory con- tiguous to and including any highway when within any 180 m along such highway there are buildings in use for business or industrial purposes, including but not limited to hotels, banks, or office buildings that occupy at least 90 m of frontage on one side or 90 m collectively on both sides of the highway. (Note: 1 m = 3.28 ft.)

OCR for page 391
395 Glossary Collector Roads and Streets Collector roads and streets collect vehicles from local roads and abut- ting properties and route them to arterials. Traffic volumes are rela- tively low and design speeds may be as low as 31 mph (50 km/h). Collectors have all intersections at grade and little access control. They may also have pedestrians and parked vehicles. Collectors rep- resent 23 percent of the rural highway length and carry 25 percent of the rural vehicle miles of travel. Collector streets in urban areas have design speeds of 31 mph (50 km/h) or greater. Their function is divided equally between mobility and access. Collectors are more likely than minor arterials to accom- modate parking, pedestrians, bicycles, and local buses. Collectors and minor arterials account for 21 percent of urban street length and carry 28 percent of all urban travel. Compliance with Speed Regulations There is no commonly accepted definition of compliance with speed regulations. Motorists traveling less than the posted speed limit might appear to be in compliance, but under certain weather, visibil- ity, or traffic conditions, they may be violating the basic speed law. In the more general case of free-flowing vehicles under favorable envi- ronmental conditions, measures of compliance (actually, noncompli- ance) include the percentage of vehicles exceeding the posted limit by 6 or 9 mph (10 or 15 km/h), or the percentage of vehicles exceeding the roadway's design speed. Costs of Motor Vehicle Crashes In highway safety analyses, it is often necessary to assign costs to traffic crashes. For example, the National Safety Council (NSC) rec- ommends economic costs for crashes on the basis of productivity lost and expenses incurred because of collisions. NSC also estimated comprehensive costs for crashes, which included economic costs and a measure of the value of lost quality of life associated with deaths

OCR for page 391
MANAGING SPEED 396 and injuries. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has also suggested collision costs based on two different injury scales: (a) the KABC scale, with four injury levels ranging from Killed to Possible Injury; and (b) the Abbreviated Injury Scale, with six injury levels ranging from Killed to Minor. Table E-1 compares the costs recom- mended by NSC (1996) and FHWA ( Judycki 1994). Table E-1 National Safety Council and FHWA Traffic Crash Costs Type of Accident Cost ($) Abbreviated Type of Injury Economic Comprehensive KABC Scale Injury Scale Fatal 790,000 2,790,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 Critical 1,980,000 Severe 490,000 Incapacitating 41,200 138,000 189,000 Serious 150,000 Evident 13,900 35,700 36,000 Moderate 40,000 Possible 7,900 17,000 19,000 Minor 5,000 6,000 a 1,700 a No injury-- 2,000 property damage only a NSC economic costs include minor injuries whereas comprehensive costs exclude all injuries. Crash Probability In typical use, crash probability refers to the long-term likelihood that a driver will be involved in a crash under a specified set of con- ditions (e.g., on a given trip, during the coming year). Estimates of national crash experience can be used to calculate average crash prob- abilities. However, crash probability is known to vary with driver characteristics, vehicle type, roadway features, and environmental factors, so the crash probability for an individual motorist may be substantially more or less than the average.

OCR for page 391
397 Glossary Crash Severity A fatal crash is a crash that results in one or more deaths within 30 days of the crash. A nonfatal injury crash is a crash in which at least one person is injured, but no injury results in death. A property-dam- age-only (PDO) crash is a collision that results in property damage, but in which no person is injured. Cross Section The roadway cross section consists of those geometric features per- pendicular to the direction of travel. Common cross-section elements include the following: Number of lanes--determined by the projected traffic volume for a facility. Lane width--must be sufficient to accommodate the design vehicle, allow for imprecise steering maneuvers, and provide clear- ance for traffic flow in adjacent lanes. It is dependent on the design vehicle, design speed, volume, the presence or absence of shoulders, horizontal alignment, and the presence of oncoming traffic. Cross slope--promotes drainage of surface water. Shoulders--used for emergency stopping and for lateral support of base and surface courses. Medians--used to separate opposing directions of traffic on multilane highways. Marginal elements--curbs, gutters, sidewalks, roadside slopes, and barriers. Design Driver A roadway's design must be compatible with drivers' capabilities and limitations. The design driver embodies those specific human char- acteristics that should be recognized in designing and operating the road. It is inappropriate to design for the median driver because this would potentially put half the drivers at risk. On the other hand, it is

OCR for page 391
MANAGING SPEED 398 probably not realistic to design for the 99th percentile value of every human characteristic. Although the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) does not provide an explicit description of the design driver, the following elements certainly should be included: Familiarity: The designer should assume that motorists are driv- ing on a roadway for the first time and that they have no familiarity with its features. Driver age: Certain human performance characteristics deterio- rate with age. Persons over the age of 65 constitute an increasing por- tion of the driving population, and their special needs must be considered in highway design. Vision: States specify a level of visual acuity (typically 20/30 cor- rected) that drivers must satisfy to retain their license. Designers must not only consider this requirement for their state, but also rec- ognize that drivers from other jurisdictions with potentially inferior visual acuity standards will be using their roads. Most states do not test drivers for nighttime vision; nevertheless, the significant amount of travel during the hours of darkness suggests that designers should consider this factor. Eye height: The height of a driver's eye above the pavement affects the length of road ahead that a driver can see; eye height is a function of both the human and the vehicle. AASHTO's recom- mended value (AASHTO 1994) of 1070 mm corresponds to the 7th percentile driver in a passenger car. Impairment: Motorists may become impaired by fatigue, med- ication, alcohol, and drugs. These imperfections, at least to the extent that they are legal (e.g., a blood alcohol content below 0.08), should be recognized by the designer. As a consequence, engineers must design for the prudent, rather than the perfect, driver. Design Speed AASHTO defines a roadway's design speed as "the maximum safe speed that can be maintained over a specified section of highway when conditions are so favorable that the design features of the high-

OCR for page 391
399 Glossary way govern" (AASHTO 1994). This is the maximum speed prudent drivers would choose when environmental conditions are very good and traffic volumes are light. Subject to the constraints of environ- mental quality, economics, aesthetics, and social impacts, AASHTO recommends higher design speeds to promote safety, mobility, and efficiency. Certain highway design features, including curvature, sight distance, and roadside elements, are highly sensitive to the choice of design speed; others, including lane and shoulder widths, do not change appreciably with design speed. In planning a roadway, the engineer initially selects a design speed; that decision, in turn, establishes upper or lower bounds on the facility's geometric design parameters. This is the principal use of design speed. On a rural, level, straight roadway with no access points and obstacle-free road- sides, the concept of design speed is not meaningful. Drivers exceeding the design speed by a small amount under favorable conditions will not necessarily have a crash, principally because AASHTO incorporates safety factors into its design recom- mendations. For example, the stopping sight distance model assumes a very conservative perception-reaction time and a wet roadway sur- face; an alert driver can react quicker and a vehicle on a dry roadway can decelerate to a stop in a much shorter distance than the design value. Likewise, an attentive motorist can exceed a horizontal curve's design speed without running off the roadway. Higher design speeds enhance safety, principally by accommodat- ing minor driver errors and providing greater opportunities for crash avoidance. AASHTO strongly recommends consistency in design speed along a roadway section to avoid misleading motorists. Although it appears reasonable that the posted speed limit should not exceed a highway's design speed, the existing roadway system includes countless horizontal curves with safe speeds below the design speed or posted speed limit; these situations are routinely handled with curve warning signs and advisory speed plates (see Figure E-2). Engineering Study The Uniform Vehicle Code (National Committee on Uniform Traffic Laws and Ordinances 1992) and state motor vehicle laws

OCR for page 391
MANAGING SPEED 400 authorize state and local highway agencies to determine whether the statutory speed limit on a section of road is greater or less than is reasonable under the conditions that exist at the location. This determination must be based on an engineering study, which requires data collection and analysis in the determination of an appropriate limit. The data considered would typically include the following factors: Area--rural, suburban, or urban; Results of a spot speed study, principally the 85th percentile and 10-mph (16-km/h) pace speeds; Crash experience, with particular attention to speed-related crashes; Traffic volume and composition (i.e., types of vehicles); Existing traffic controls (regulatory and warning); Design features, including horizontal and vertical alignment, sight distance, and lane width; Pavement surface condition; Parking; Presence and usage of driveways; Roadside hazards; Pedestrians and bicycles; Speed limits on adjacent roadway sections; and Existing level of speed enforcement. Typically, the speed data--particularly the 85th percentile speed-- provide the first approximation of the speed zone limit. The limit may be adjusted from this value on the basis of the other factors. Externalities "Externalities" refers to the risks imposed on others not taken into account by an individual's decision. In the case of speed choice, the term refers to the risks imposed on other road users (e.g., other driv- ers and vehicle occupants, pedestrians, bicyclists) by an individual driver's selection of a driving speed. For example, a driver's decision to accept a higher risk of death or injury in exchange for a shorter trip

OCR for page 391
401 Glossary time almost certainly increases the risk for other road users. Externalities are one of the primary reasons for regulating speed. Fatality Rates There are four common methods of calculating fatality rates: Travel-based fatality rate--fatalities per 100 million vehicle-mi of travel (100 mvm). In 1996, the United States had a travel-based fatality rate of 1.7 fatalities per 100 mvm. This rate is commonly used in the highway engineering community. (Note: 100 million vehicle- mi = 161 million vehicle-km.) Registered vehicle fatality rate--fatalities per 100,000 registered vehicles. In 1996, the United States had a registered vehicle death rate of 20.8 fatalities per 100,000 registered vehicles. Population fatality rate--fatalities per 100,000 population. In 1996, the United States had a population death rate of 15.8 fatalities per 100,000 people. This method of normalizing fatalities is com- monly used by the health profession for infection and mortality rates. Driver fatality rate--fatalities per 100,000 licensed drivers. In 1996, the United States had a driver fatality rate of 23.3 fatalities per 100,000 licensed drivers. Free Flow A free-flowing vehicle is one whose driver has the ability to choose a speed of travel without undue influence from other traffic, conspicu- ous police presence, or environmental factors. In other words, the driver of a free-flowing vehicle chooses a speed that he or she finds comfortable on the basis of the appearance of the road. In conducting a spot speed study, the field observer detects and records the speed of free-flowing vehicles. Vehicles operating under the following conditions are not free flowing and must be excluded from the sample: Two vehicles in the same lane have a headway (time from the front of one vehicle to the front of the following vehicle) of less than 4 s.

OCR for page 391
MANAGING SPEED 408 Sight Distance Sight distance is the length of roadway ahead visible to the driver. AASHTO design standards discuss four types of sight distancedecision, intersection, passing, and stopping (AASHTO 1994). Sight Distance, Decision Decision sight distance Table E-2 Rural Decision Sight Distances is the length of road- Decision Sight Distance (m) way required for a driv- Speed (km/h) Stop Path Change er to detect an 50 75 145 unexpected hazard in 60 95 175 70 125 200 the environment, rec- 80 155 230 ognize the hazard, 90 185 275 select an appropriate 100 225 315 speed and path, and 110 265 335 initiate and complete 120 305 375 the required maneuver Note: 1 m = 3.28 ft and 1 km/h = 0.62 mph. safely and efficiently. In contrast to stopping sight distance, this model assumes that the driver will not simply slam on the brakes but rather will assess the sit- uation, make an informed decision, and implement the action with- out interfering with other traffic. Table E-2 indicates decision sight distances on rural highways where the expected maneuvers are a con- trolled stop and a speed or path change. Sight Distance, Intersection AASHTO identifies several intersection sight distance criteria that must be considered by the designer (AASHTO 1994). At the risk of oversimplification, intersections on high-speed rural highways must provide sufficient sight distance for motorists under the following conditions:

OCR for page 391
409 Glossary A driver approaching an intersection controlled by a Yield or Stop sign or a traffic signal must have sufficient distance to see and react to the traffic control. Drivers stopped at a Yield or Stop sign and preparing to cross or turn onto a through highway must be able to see a sufficient distance to make their maneuver with safety and without significantly inter- fering with motorists on the through road. Drivers on the major roadway intending to turn left onto a cross street must have adequate sight distance to make their maneuver with safety. AASHTO prescribes numerical values for these and other situations at intersections; in all cases, the required sight distances increase with the speeds of traffic approaching the intersection on the controlled approaches and on the through highway. Many jurisdictions specify intersection sight distances that are less stringent than those recom- mended by AASHTO. Sight Distance, Passing Passing sight distance is the length of roadway that a motorist must be able to see ahead in order to safely complete a passing maneuver on a two-lane highway. The AASHTO model for passing sight dis- tance design assumes that the passing maneuver, once initiated, will be completed (AASHTO 1994). The passing sight distance model uses a driver eye height of 1070 mm and a height for the opposing vehicle of 1300 mm. The model also makes assumptions about the relative speeds of the passing vehicle, the passed vehicle, and an oncoming vehicle. AASHTO's assumptions for design purposes are fairly conservative and result in long distances. By contrast, passing sight distances for operational purposes assume that a partially com- pleted passing maneuver may be aborted if an opposing vehicle comes into view while the passing vehicle is in the left lane. This assumption shortens the necessary sight distance considerably. Values from the operational analysis are used by traffic engineers in

OCR for page 391
MANAGING SPEED 410 establishing the loca- Table E-3 Passing Sight Distances tion and length of Minimum Sight Distance (m) marked no-passing Speed (km/h) Design Operation zones. Table E-3 com- 50 345 150 pares the passing sight 60 407 170 70 482 200 distances for design 80 541 240 and operational pur- 90 605 280 poses. 100 670 320 110 728 360 120 792 Note: 1 m = 3.28 ft and 1 km/h = 0.62 mph. Sight Distance, Stopping Stopping sight distance is the minimum distance for a vehicle travel- ing at or near a highway's design speed on wet pavement to come to a complete stop before reaching a stationary object (150 mm high) in its path (AASHTO 1994). Adequate stopping sight distance, which should be provided at every point along all roads, consists of two components--the motorist's perception-reaction distance and the vehicle's braking distance. Stopping sight distance may be calculated using the following formula: V2 d 0.278tV 254f where d minimum stopping sight distance (m); t perception-reaction time, assumed to be 2.5 s; V initial speed (km/h); and f coefficient of friction between tires and roadway. The solid line in Figure E-3 shows the relationship between stopping sight distance and highway design speed. The difference between the stopping and braking distances is the length of highway traveled dur- ing the perception-reaction time.

OCR for page 391
411 Glossary Speed Change Lanes Speed change lanes include acceleration and deceleration lanes, which are used in conjunction with interchange ramps to permit entering vehicles to attain the speed of the through traffic and exit- ing vehicles to decelerate outside of the through-traffic lanes. Speed Dispersion The speeds of individual vehicles on a street or highway vary, often in the manner suggested by Figure E-1. Speed dispersion refers to this spread in vehicle speeds. Speed dispersion can be quantified in various ways including the standard deviation, variance, 10-mph pace, or range (high minus low). There is general agreement that the safest conditions occur when all vehicles at a site are traveling at about the same speed. Speed Limit, Absolute An absolute speed limit specifies a numerical value, the exceeding of which is always in violation of the law, regardless of the conditions or hazards involved. Many enforcement officers prefer absolute speed limits because they reduce the incidence of challenged citations. However, absolute speed limits lack flexibility, particularly in those situations where traffic conditions vary widely. Approximately two- thirds of the states have absolute speed limits. Prima facie speed lim- its are the alternative to absolute limits. Speed Limit, Differential The motor vehicle codes in some states prescribe different speed lim- its for different classes of vehicles. For example, the maximum speed limit on a rural section of Interstate might be 75 mph (121 km/h) for cars, pickup trucks, and vans, but 65 mph (105 km/h) for large trucks. The primary rationale for this type of regulation is that large trucks have much longer stopping distance than cars. In the absence of dif- ferential speed limits, studies have found that large trucks travel 1 to 2 mph (2 to 3 km/h) slower than cars on level sections of rural

OCR for page 391
MANAGING SPEED 412 Interstate. This value may double when differential speed limits are introduced, but the actual difference between car and truck speeds rarely approaches the difference cited in the code. Speed Limit, Posted The posted speed limit is the value conveyed to the motorist on a black-on-white regula- tory sign such as the one shown in Figure E- 8. Standard engineering practice is to post speed limits for freeways, arterials, and any roadway or street where speed zoning has altered the limit from the statutory value. They are also used at any point where the speed limit changes, including points beyond Figure E-8 Speed major rural intersections where traffic may limit sign. change from one road to another. Speed Limit, Prima Facie A prima facie speed limit is one above which drivers are presumed to be driving unlawfully. Nevertheless, if charged with a violation, driv- ers have the opportunity to demonstrate in court that their speed was safe for conditions at the time and not in violation of the basic speed limit, even though they may have exceeded the numerical limit. Approximately one-third of the states have prima facie speed limits or limits of each type (i.e., prima facie and absolute). Absolute speed limits are the alternative to prima facie limits. Speed Limit, Statutory State motor vehicle laws specify numerical values for speed limits on specific categories of streets and highways. For example, a code might limit speeds to 25 mph (40 km/h) in residential areas, 30 mph (48 km/h) in business districts, and 55 mph (89 km/h) on all other roads. Unless otherwise prohibited by law, these limits may be altered on the basis of an engineering study.

OCR for page 391
413 Glossary Speed Limit, Variable The typical speed zoning process establishes a limit that is posted and enforceable 24 h/d. In reality, streets and highways experience conditions of traffic, weather, and incidents when lower limits would be appropri- ate. In some cases, the conditions will be such that motorists could not possibly travel at the posted speed limit. On the other hand, an urban speed limit established in part because of daytime pedestrian traffic may be unrealistically low for conditions at night. One method of addressing these types of situations is through the use of variable speed limits. An urban freeway variable speed limit system would operate in the following manner. Detectors would monitor the actual volume, speed, and density of traffic in sections of the freeway. This information would be used to determine where congestion is causing traffic to slow. In advance of these locations, electronic speed limit signs (simi- lar to Figure E-8, but with changeable numbers) would be remotely controlled to alter the posted speed limit. Motorists who comply with these regulations would decrease their speed and not approach the end of a stopped or slow-moving traffic queue at normal freeway speeds. Speed Parameters Field data from spot speed studies of free-flowing vehicles (see Figure E-9) are processed to determine typical data parameters of central tendency (average or median) and dispersion (standard devi- ation, variance, 10-mph pace, and range). Speed Standard Deviation The standard deviation, which has the units of speed (km/h), is the positive square root of the speed variance. Speed standard deviations are often 3.7 to 4.3 mph (6 to 7 km/h) on urban streets and 5.6 to 6.8 mph (9 to 11 km/h) on freeways. The standard deviation's value is strongly influenced by a few vehicles traveling at very high or very low speeds; elimination of these vehicles will reduce the standard deviation. The standard deviation is readily calculated from a sample of speed measurements such as those shown in Figure E-9. It may be roughly

OCR for page 391
MANAGING SPEED 414 approximated by the speed range (largest observed speed minus the smallest) divided by 6. The standard deviation may also be estimated as the difference between the 85th percentile and average speeds. Figure E-9 Sample speed data collection form. Speed Variance Speed variance for a spot speed study is calculated by summing the squares of the differences between each measured speed and the aver- age speed, and dividing the total by the sample size minus one (n 1). The variance, which is the square of the standard deviation, thus has

OCR for page 391
415 Glossary units of speed squared (km2/h2). Speed variance has little practical value and is rarely cited as an output value from a spot speed study. The vari- ance's principal application is in determining the standard deviation. The technical literature includes studies in which analysts relied on selected speed parameters, rather than having the original data such as that shown in Figure E-9. Using speed study results that report only the average and the 85th percentile speeds, these analysts have attempted to quantify speed dispersion by calculating the numerical difference between these two values. Although this difference usually provides a good approximation of the speed sample's standard deviation, these analysts have unfortunately and incorrectly labeled this result as "speed variance." In reality, it is an estimate of standard deviation. Speed Zone Speed zoning is the process of establishing a reasonable and safe speed limit for a section of roadway where the statutory speed limits given in the motor vehicle laws [e.g., 30 mph (48 km/h) in business districts] do not fit the road or traffic conditions at a specific loca- tion. The limits may be altered on the basis of an engineering study. To be enforceable, the new limits must be posted along the roadway using a standard regulatory sign such as the one shown in Figure E-8. In addition, speed limits that are increased or decreased as a result of the speed zoning process must be recorded in documents maintained by an appropriate agency (e.g., state supreme court library). Speed zones should be periodically restudied. The basic principles of speed zoning should also be applied to special situations such as school crossings and roadway construction areas. In addition, they may be used to establish minimum speed limits for freeways. Spot Speed Study Engineers conduct spot speed studies by measuring and recording the speeds of a sample of free-flowing vehicles as they pass a point on a street or highway. The measurements are usually made with a hand-held radar or laser speed meter. The field data are typically recorded on a data form similar to the one shown in Figure E-9. This study is an essential ele-

OCR for page 391
MANAGING SPEED 416 ment in the more comprehensive engineering study required for speed zoning. Unless there is an interest in other conditions, a spot speed study is normally conducted on a straight, level road during daylight, off-peak hours. Speed data are collected separately by direction. Minimum sam- ple sizes of at least 100 vehicles are necessary to properly represent the speed characteristics of the traffic at the study site. Traffic Calming Traffic calming is a term used to identify various engineering tech- niques to physically control vehicle speeds and/or volumes on local streets. The techniques, which include speed humps, traffic diverters, narrow roadways, and staggered alignment, are deployed in response to complaints by adjacent property owners of speeding traffic or excessive traffic volumes. Although these techniques have been found effective on local streets, they must be planned and implemented carefully to ensure that the original problems are not simply moved to another local street. Vehicle Alignment A roadway's vertical alignment consists of grades, where the elevation changes at a fixed rate per unit distance along the highway, and ver- tical curves, where the highway grade increases or decreases. These features are portrayed in Figure E-10. As indicated in Table E-4, AASHTO recommends maximum grades for rural highways as a function of highway classification and type of terrain (AASHTO 1994). Maximum grades on urban freeways are identical to those for rural freeways, but grades steeper than those given in Table E-4 are permitted on urban arterial, collector, and local streets. Minimum lengths of crest ver- tical curves are a function of the approach and departure Figure E-10 Vertical alignment grades as well as the stopping features. sight distance for the road- way's design speed.

OCR for page 391
417 Glossary Table E-4 Maximum Vertical Grades for Rural Roads Maximum Grade (%) Terrain Freeway Arterial Collector Local Level 34 35 47 58 Rolling 45 46 510 611 Mountainous 56 58 612 1016 Vehicle Miles of Travel The total amount of travel on a roadway segment or on an entire roadway system is typically expressed in vehicle miles of travel (VMT). The numerical value may be obtained by multiplying the length of a section (in miles) by average traffic volume (vehicles per day), summing these values for all sections of interest, and expanding the results to an annual value. VMT is commonly used to character- ize the amount of travel on different classes of roadway and as a nor- malizing factor in calculating crash or fatality rates. REFERENCES ABBREVIATIONS AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials NSC National Safety Council AASHTO.1994. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Washington, D.C. Chowdhury, M.A., D.L.Warren, H. Bissell, and S. Taori. 1998. Are the Criteria for Setting Advisory Speeds on Curves Still Relevant? ITE Journal, Vol. 68, No. 2, Feb., pp. 3245. Judycki, D. 1994. Motor Vehicle Accident Costs. HHS-10. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Messer, C., J. Mounce, and R. Brackett. 1981. Highway Geometric Design Consistency Related to Driver Expectancy, Volume 2. Report FHWA-RD-81-036. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. National Committee on Uniform Traffic Laws and Ordinances. 1992. Uniform Vehicle Code and Model Traffic Ordinance. National Safety Council. 1996. Accident Facts.

OCR for page 391