Sweeney, L., B. Malin, and E. Newton 2003 Trail Re-identification: Learning Who You are From Where You Have Been. Data Privacy Laboratory Technical Report, LIDAP-WP12. Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science.
Taueber, C. 1981 America enters the eighties: Some social indicators. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (vol. 453). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Triplett, J. 1991 The federal statistical system’s response to emerging data needs. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 17(3-4):155-177.
U.S. Census Bureau 2004 U.S. Census Bureau Privacy Principles. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
U.S. Office of Management and Budget 2004 Statistical Programs of the United States Government: Fiscal Year 2005. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President. Also available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/05statprog.pdf [September 2005].
2005 Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review. 70 FR 2664-02 (January 14).
Willenborg, L., and T. de Waal 1995 Statistical Disclosure Control in Practice. (Lecture Notes in Statistics 111.) New York: Springer.
Winkler, W.E. 1988 Using the EM algorithm for weight computation in the Fellegi-Sunter model of record linkage. Pp. 667-671 in Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association.
1998 Re-identification methods for evaluating the confidentiality of analytically valid microdata. Research in Official Statistics 1:87-104.
Woodbury, R., A. Gustman, L. Lillard, O. Mitchell, and R. Willis 1999 The Value of Linked Data in Aging Research. Paper prepared for April 17-18, 2000, meeting of the Panel on a Research Agenda and New Data for an Aging World, Committee on Population, National Research Council, Washington, DC.