References

ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology). 2004. CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITING ENGINEERING PROGRAMS. Available online at http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/05-06-EAC%20Criteria.pdf. Accessed July 20, 2005.

AACC (American Association of Community Colleges). 2000. National Profile of Community College Trends and Statistics, 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: Community College Press.

AACC and AASCU (American Association of State Colleges and Universities). 2004. Improving Access to the Baccalaureate. Washington, D.C.: Community College Press.

ACE (American Council on Education) and AAUP (American Association of University Professors). 2000. Does Diversity Make a Difference?: Three Research Studies on Diversity in College Classrooms. Washington, D.C.: ACE and AAUP.

Adelman, C. 1999. Women and Men of the Engineering Path: A Model for Analysis of Undergraduate Careers. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Adelman, C. 2004. A Long Way Home: Tracking Potential STEM Students from High School through Community Colleges to … Presentation at the Enhancing Community College Workshop, July 7–8, 2004, Washington, D.C.: National Academies.


Bers, T. 1994. Articulation and Transfer. Pp. 247–261 in Managing Community Colleges: A Handbook for Effective Practice, edited by A. Cohen and F. Brawer. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Beston, B. 2004. The Community College Transfer Mission. Presentation to the Committee on Enhancing the Community College Pathway to Engineering Careers, April 1, 2004, Washington, D.C.: National Academies

Bradburn, E.M., R. Berger, X. Li, K. Peter, and K. Rooney. 2003. A Descriptive Summary of 1999–2000 Bachelor’s Degree Recipients One Year Later. NCES 2003-165. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.

Bradburn, E.M., and D.G. Hurst. 2001. Community college transfer rates to four-year institutions using alternative definitions of transfer. Education Statistics Quarterly 3(3):119–125.


CCST (California Council on Science and Technology). 2002. Critical Path Analysis of California’s Science and Technology Education System. Riverside, Calif.: CCST.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 103
Enhancing the Community College Pathway to Engineering Careers References ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology). 2004. CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITING ENGINEERING PROGRAMS. Available online at http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/05-06-EAC%20Criteria.pdf. Accessed July 20, 2005. AACC (American Association of Community Colleges). 2000. National Profile of Community College Trends and Statistics, 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: Community College Press. AACC and AASCU (American Association of State Colleges and Universities). 2004. Improving Access to the Baccalaureate. Washington, D.C.: Community College Press. ACE (American Council on Education) and AAUP (American Association of University Professors). 2000. Does Diversity Make a Difference?: Three Research Studies on Diversity in College Classrooms. Washington, D.C.: ACE and AAUP. Adelman, C. 1999. Women and Men of the Engineering Path: A Model for Analysis of Undergraduate Careers. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Adelman, C. 2004. A Long Way Home: Tracking Potential STEM Students from High School through Community Colleges to … Presentation at the Enhancing Community College Workshop, July 7–8, 2004, Washington, D.C.: National Academies. Bers, T. 1994. Articulation and Transfer. Pp. 247–261 in Managing Community Colleges: A Handbook for Effective Practice, edited by A. Cohen and F. Brawer. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Beston, B. 2004. The Community College Transfer Mission. Presentation to the Committee on Enhancing the Community College Pathway to Engineering Careers, April 1, 2004, Washington, D.C.: National Academies Bradburn, E.M., R. Berger, X. Li, K. Peter, and K. Rooney. 2003. A Descriptive Summary of 1999–2000 Bachelor’s Degree Recipients One Year Later. NCES 2003-165. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. Bradburn, E.M., and D.G. Hurst. 2001. Community college transfer rates to four-year institutions using alternative definitions of transfer. Education Statistics Quarterly 3(3):119–125. CCST (California Council on Science and Technology). 2002. Critical Path Analysis of California’s Science and Technology Education System. Riverside, Calif.: CCST.

OCR for page 103
Enhancing the Community College Pathway to Engineering Careers Chronicle of Higher Education. 2005. Panelists Call for Tracking of Individual Students, Preschool Through College, for Better Education Data. Available online at http://chronicle.com/daily/2005/06. Chubin, D.E., G.S. May, and E.L. Babco. 2005. Diversifying the engineering workforce. Journal of Engineering Education 94(1):73–86. Clark College. 2002. Clark College Transfer Study 2000–2001. Available online at http://www.clark.edu/pdf/general_information/transfer_study.pdf. Accessed August 16, 2004. CPEC (California Postsecondary Education Commission). 2004. CPEC Transfer Pathways. Available online at http://www.cpec.ca.gov/OnLineData/TransferPathway.asp. Accessed August 13, 2004. Cunningham, A.F., and J. Milam (2005). Feasibility of a Student Unit Record System within the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (NCES 2005-180). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Dimitriu, D., and J. O’Connor. 2004. Forging Stronger Ties between Community Colleges and Four-Year Universities. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education, 2-3. 6(1):41–56. DOD (U.S. Department of Defense). 2001. Roadmap for National Security: Imperative for Change. Phase III Report of the U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. DOED (U.S. Department of Education). 2003. The Condition of Education 2003. NCES 2003–067. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. DOED. 2004. The Condition of Education 2004. NCES 2004–077. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. ECS (Education Commission of the States). 2001. Transfer and Articulation Policies. Denver, Colorado: ECS. Available online at http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/23/75/2375.htm. Accessed August 17, 2004. EWC (Engineering Workforce Commission). 2004. Engineering and Technology Enrollments: Fall 2004, Washington, D.C.: EWC, American Association of Engineering Societies. Grimson, J. 2002. Re-engineering the curriculum for the 21st century. European Journal of Engineering Education 27(1):31–37. Heyman, GD., B. Martyna, and S. Bhatia. 2002. Gender and achievement-related beliefts among engineering students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 8(1):41–52. Hoachlander, G., A. C. Sikora, and L. Horn. 2003. Community college students: goals, academic preparation, and outcomes. Education Statistics Quarterly 5(2):121–128. Ignash, J. 1999. In the shadow of baccalaureate institutions. ERIC Digest ED348129. November 17. Available online at: http://www.ericdigests.org/1992-2/shadow.htm. Ignash, J. M., and B. K. Townsend. 2000. Evaluating state-level articulation agreements according to good practice. Community College Review 28(3):1–21. Inman, W.E., and L. Mayes. 1999. The importance of being first: unique characteristics of first-generation community college students. Community College Review 26(4):3–22. Jackson, S. 2002. The Quiet Crisis. Washington, D.C.: Building Engineering and Science talent (BEST). Kasper, H. 2002–2003. The changing role of the community college. Occupational Outlook Quarterly 46(4):4–21. Katsinas, S., J. Palmer, and T. Tollefson. 2004. State Funding for Community Colleges: Perceptions from the Field. National Council of State Directors of Community Colleges. Available online at http://www.statedirectors.org/surveys/StateFIN.pdf.

OCR for page 103
Enhancing the Community College Pathway to Engineering Careers Kintzer, F. C., and J.L. Wattenbarger. 1985. The articulation/transfer phenomenon: patterns and directions. Washington, D.C.: American Association of Community and Junior Colleges. Kozeracki, C. 2001. Studying transfer students: designs and methodological challenges. New Directions for Community Colleges (114):61–75. Laanan, F.S. 2001. Transfer student adjustment. New Directions for Community Colleges (114):5–13. MacNeil, W. 2001. Survey: long-stagnant student transfer rate jumps. Community College Week 13(18):2–3. McCormick, A.C., and C.D. Carroll. 1997. Transfer Behavior among Beginning Postsecondary Students, 1989–94. ED 408 929. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. NAE (National Academy of Engineering). 2004. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. NCES (National Center for Education Statistics). 2004. Beginning Postsecondary Students (BPS) Longitudinal Study. Available online at http://www.nces.ed.gov/surveys/bps/. Accessed August 13, 2004. NSB. 2004. Science and Engineering Indicators 2004. NSB 04-1 and NSB 04-1A. Arlington, Va.: National Science Foundation. NSF (National Science Foundation). 1996. Undergraduate Origins of Recent (1991-95) Science and Engineering Doctorate Recipients, Detailed Statistical Tables. NSF 96-334. Arlington, Va.: NSF. NSF. 2003. Characteristics of Recent Science and Engineering Graduates: 2001. NSF 04-302. Arlington, Va.: NSF. NSF. 2004. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2004. NSF 04-317. Arlington, Va.: NSF. NSF. 2005. WebCASPAR: Integrated Science and Engineering Resources Data System. Available online at http://caspar.nsf.gov/includes/checkJavascriptAbility2.jsp;jsessionid=F90C3CB9575FE5968E5551EB51AA9188?submitted=1. O’Connor, J., and D. Dimitriu. 2004. Getting an EDGE in Engineering Education. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education. Oregon University System. 2002. Transfer Activity in Oregon Postsecondary Education, 1996–97 to 2000–01. Available online at http://www.ous.edu/aca/OregonTransfer02.pdf. Accessed August 16, 2004. Pell Institute. 2004. Indicators of Opportunity in Higher Education. Washington, D.C.: Pell Institute. Person, A., and J. Rosenbaum. 2004. For Needy Students, College Success Depends on More Than Access. Unpublished paper presented at the American Sociological Association meeting, August 15, 2004. Phillippe, K.A., and L. Gonzalez Sullivan. 2005. National Profile of Community Colleges: Trends and Statistics. 4th ed. Washington, D.C.: Community College Press. Rifkin, T. 1998. Improving Articulation Policy to Increase Transfer. Education Commission of the States Policy Paper, September. Denver, Colo.: Education Commission of the States. Rovai, A. 2002. A preliminary look at the structural differences of higher education classroom communities in traditional and ALN courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 6(1):41–56. Seymour, E., and N. Hewitt. 1997. Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. SWE (Society of Women Engineers). 2004. NACME: Thirty years, thousands of stories. SWE Magazine 50(3):51–54.

OCR for page 103
Enhancing the Community College Pathway to Engineering Careers SUNY (State University of New York) TYESA (Two-Year Engineering Science Association of New York State). 2005. Two Year Engineering Science Association of New York State. Available online at http://www.tyesa.org. Tsapogas, J. 2004. The Role of Community Colleges in the Education of Recent Science and Engineering Graduates. NSF 04-315. Arlington, Va.: NSF. UCLA Community College Studies. 2004. Recent and Ongoing Research Projects. Available online at http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/ccs/research.htm. Accessed August 11, 2004. Ulseth, R., and A. Wenger. 2002. Follow-on Report of the Sugarlake Conference. Grand Rapids, Minn.: Itasca Community College. Wellman, J. 2002. State Policy and Community College: Baccalaureate Transfer. San Jose, Calif.: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education and the Institute for Higher Education Policy. Welsh, J.F. 2002. Assessing the transfer function: benchmarking best practices from state higher education agencies. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 27(3): 257–268. Welsh, J.F., and C. Kjorlien. 2001. State support for interinstitutional transfer and articulation: the impact of databases and information systems. Community College Journal of Research and Practice 25(4):313–332. Wulf, W.A. 2002. Diversity in Engineering: Managing the Workforce of the Future. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Wulf, W.A., and G.M.C. Fisher. 2002. A makeover for engineering education. Issues in Science and Technology 18(3):35–39. Zamani, E.M. 2001. Institutional responses to barriers to the transfer process. New Directions for Community Colleges (114):15–24.