The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Reaping the Benefits of Genomic and Proteomic Research: Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation, and Public Health
Murray, F., and S. Stern. 2004. Do Formal Intellectual Property Rights Hinder the Free Flow of Scientific Knowledge? An Empirical Test of the Anti-Commons Hypothesis. Unpublished manuscript.
National Research Council. Committee on Mapping and Sequencing the Human Genome. 1988. Mapping and Sequencing the Human Genome. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 1997. Intellectual Property Rights and Research Tools in Molecular biology.Summary of a Workshop Held at the National Academy of Sciences, February 15-16, 1996. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. Committee on Responsibilities of Authorship in the Biological Sciences. 2003. Sharing Publication-Related Data and Materials: Responsibilities of Authorship in the Life Sciences. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. Committee on Intellectual Property Rights in the Knowledge-Based Economy. 2004. A Patent System for the 21st Century. Merrill, S. A., R. C. Levin, and M. B. Myers, eds. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
National Science Foundation. National Science Board. 2004. Science and Engineering Indicators. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
Oosterwegel, M. A., R. J. Greenwald, D. A. Mandelbrot, R. B. Lorsbach, and A. H. Sharpe. 1999. CTLA-4 and T cell activation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 11(3):294-300.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2002. Genetic Inventions, Intellectual Property Rights and Licensing Practices, p. 48. Available at www.oecd.org/dataoecd/42/21/2491084.pdf. Accessed June 22, 2005.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2005. Intellectual Property and Competition Policy in the Biotechnology Industry. Available at www.oecd.org/dataoecd/36/4/35040373.pdf. Accessed June 22, 2005.
Patent and Trademark Act Amendments of 1980 (Bayh-Dole Act), Pub. L. No. 96-517, 94 Stat. 3015 (codified in scattered sections of 35 U.S.C.).
Petricoin, E. F., and L. A. Liotaa. 2002. Proteomic analysis at the bedside: Early detection of cancer. Trends Biotechnol. 20(12 Suppl):S30-4.
Pressman, L., R. Burgess, R. M. Cook-Deegan, S. J. McCormack, I. Nami-Wolk, M. Soucy, and L. Walters. 2005. Patenting and licensing practices for DNA-based patents at U.S. academic institutions. Nat. Biotechnol. In press.
Principles and Guidelines for Recipients of NIH Research Grants and Contracts on Obtaining and Disseminating Biomedical Research Resources: Final Notice, 64 Fed. Reg. 72,090 (proposed Dec. 23, 1999).
Rosenshine, I., T. Umanski, O. Ilan, A. Peleg-Lavi, Y. Fang, I. Nisan, and D. Friedberg 1999. Regulation of Virulence Genes and Host Specificity by EPEC. Presented at UNESCO Workshop on Science for Peace and Regional Scientific Cooperation in Molecular Biology, Microbiology, and Biotechnology. Jerusalem, Israel.
Sampat, B. Patents on Academic Genomic Discoveries: Effects on Biomedical Research. Working Paper, Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan. Forthcoming.
Sanger, F., S. Nicklen, and A. R. Coulson. 1977. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 74(12):5463-5647.
Service, R. F. 2001. Proteomics: Gene and protein patents get ready to go head to head. Science. 294(5549):2082-2083.
Sheridan, C. 2004. Curie’s victory over BRCA1. Nat. Biotechnol. 22(7):797.
Shimbo, I., R. Nakajima, S. Yokohama, and K. Sumikura. 2004. Patent protection for protein structure analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 22(1):109-112.