Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 15
Review of NASA Plans for the International Space Station 3 Plans for ISS Construction According to the materials presented to the panel,a the ISS today is approximately 50 percent completed. Issues surrounding the ISS as a facility for research, technology demonstration, operations demonstration to support exploration appear to fall into three categories: the completion of construction, the post-shuttle logistical support, and crew deployment. COMPLETION OF ISS CONSTRUCTION While the panel did not receive substantive information about completing construction of the ISS in NASA briefings, nearly all of them referred to it. The rest of this chapter is based on what the panel inferred about NASA’s plans from those briefings and other information provided to it. The shuttle will be decommissioned at the end of 2010. The current goal is 19 shuttle flights, which will allow deployment of most of the major planned facilities. Currently, the shuttle is the only transportation system capable of deploying the large ISS structural components and research modules. The ISS external configuration remains as previously planned, with the exception of the deletion of the centrifuge accommodation module (CAM) and the Russian science power module (SPM). Animal holding facilities and the life sciences glove box (both would have been internal components of the CAM) were also deleted.b Otherwise all major facilities are planned to be deployed by the shuttle. Examination of documentation provided to the panel indicates that several research support facilities have been deleted in concert with cancellation of the research program that would have utilized them.c In addition to the deletion of the CAM and the Russian SPM, some logistics flights were deleted, reducing the number of planned shuttle flights from 28 to 19. To build schedule margin, the program will endeavor to fly extra flights in some years. Given that shuttle flights are being delayed and that all future flight schedules are unsure, the planned ISS configuration might not be completed by 2010, which puts ISS exploration mission objectives at risk. It appears that there are no plans to provide an alternative to the launch-by- a Mark Uhran, assistant associate administrator, International Space Station, Space Operations Mission Directorate, NASA Headquarters, “International Space Station: First Steps to Exploration,” presentation to the Review of NASA Strategic Roadmaps: Space Station Panel, dated October 3, 2005, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. b Habitat holding racks would have supported up to four habitats optimized for plant culture, cell culture, invertebrates, or small mammals. Each mammalian habitat can house up to 6 adult rats or 12 mice in microgravity conditions for up to 90 days or longer if husbandry supplies are changed out by the crew. The life sciences glove box would have provided a containment facility for these changeouts and other experiments requiring crew intervention. Such capabilities would allow researchers to use animal surrogates to quantify the long-term effects of the space environment on model organisms, including mammalian species, and to test the safety and efficacy of proposed countermeasures before their use in humans. Neither a quantitative nor a qualitative assessment of the additional risks posed for human spaceflight by the deletion of these facilities was presented to the committee. c Trinh, Eugene, NASA Headquarters, “Human Systems Research and Technology. Summary of Zero Base Review (ZBR). Process and Results,” presentation dated September 12, 2005.
OCR for page 16
Review of NASA Plans for the International Space Station shuttle of ISS structural components and research modules if the shuttle does not complete this task by 2010. POST-SHUTTLE ISS LOGISTICS SUPPORT A robust logistics capability not only will maintain the basic functioning of the ISS facility but also will be paramount in accomplishing ISS exploration mission objectives. Logistics flights to the ISS will deploy crew supplies; maintenance equipment, including replacement spares; specific research experiments and associated equipment and samples; and, finally, technology demonstration hardware and associated provisions. Logistics requirements can be categorized as either pressurized logistics for internal use or unpressurized logistics for external use. The size and shape of unpressurized logistics are such as to prevent them from being handled internally. NASA suggested that logistics requirements after 2010 over and above those provided by the current baseline Progress flights, the European Space Agency’s automated transfer vehicle (ATV) flights, and the Japanese H-II transfer vehicle (HTV) flights will be provided by a combination of a yet-to-be-procured U.S. commercial cargo vehicle, the crew exploration vehicle (CEV) pressurized cargo system, the cargo delivery vehicle (an unpressurized CEV derivative), and additional Progress, HTV, and ATV flights. The capabilities of each element in the combination, the acquisition schedules, and the funding requirements have not been specified in enough detail to give the panel confidence that ISS exploration mission objectives have a high likelihood of being fulfilled. This suggests that there would be significant value in developing a detailed plan to provide the post-shuttle logistics system. CREW DEPLOYMENT Although no clear data were provided on the amount of crew time required to accomplish the planned ISS research, technology demonstrations, and operations demonstrations, it is unlikely that a team of three will be sufficient. Nor were plans for increasing the crew size to six discussed in detail. A discussion and review of other NASA materials suggested several options for crew deployment. NASA described Notional Scenario 1,1 which provided for a crew of six in 2015. Notional Scenario 2 provided for a crew of six in 2009. In response to questions, NASA indicated that the ISS might be capable of sustaining a crew of six in 2008 at the earliest, depending on deployment of the advanced environmental control and life support systems. The panel believes that in order to accomplish ISS exploration mission objectives, the crew complement has to be increased as soon as practicable. RECOMMENDATIONS The following steps are needed to make possible the research, technology demonstrations, and operations demonstrations required to enable plans for human exploration of the Moon and Mars: NASA should plan options and decision points for obtaining a post-shuttle logistics capability for maintaining the ISS facility, for supporting the flight crew and research, and for demonstrating the technology and operations that will enable exploration missions. NASA should establish priorities and develop back-up plans to enable the post-2010 deployment of large ISS structural components and the research facilities required to accomplish exploration mission objectives. NASA should develop plans to deploy six persons to the ISS as soon as practicable, preferably in 2008.
OCR for page 17
Review of NASA Plans for the International Space Station REFERENCE 1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). 2004. Bioastronautics Critical Path Roadmap. NASA, Washington, D.C.
Representative terms from entire chapter: