Cover Image

PAPERBACK
$60.00



View/Hide Left Panel

egies to delay marriage and counter the practice of dowry need to expand beyond education or employment. More comprehensive, direct, and context specific strategies must be sought simultaneously—raising community awareness of the negative effects of early marriage and countering fears of allowing girls to remain single; providing for the acquisition of usable vocational and life skills; and enhancing young women’s real access to and control over economic resources and decision making relating to their own lives.

REFERENCES

Altekar, A.S. (1962). The position of women in Hindu civilization. Delhi, India: Motilal Banarasidas.

Amin, S., and Cain, M. (1997). The rise of dowry in Bangladesh. In G.W. Jones, R.M. Douglas, J.C. Caldwell, and R.M. D’Souza (Eds.), The continuing demographic transition (pp. 209-306). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.


Bhat, P.N.M., and Halli, S.S. (1999). Demography of brideprice and dowry: Causes and consequences of the Indian marriage squeeze. Population Studies, 53(2), 129-148.


Caldwell, J.C., Reddy, P.H., and Caldwell, P. (1982). The causes of demographic change in rural South India: A micro approach. Population and Development Review, 8(4), 689-727.

Caldwell, J.C., Reddy, P.H., and Caldwell, P. (1983). The causes of marriage change in South India. Population Studies, 37(3), 343-361.

Caldwell, J.C., Gajanayake, I., Caldwell, B., and Caldwell, P. (1989). Is marriage delay a multiphasic response to pressures for fertility decline? The case of Sri Lanka. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 51(2), 337-351.

Committee on the Status of Women in India. (1973). India: Towards equality. New Delhi: Government of India.


Das Gupta, M. (1987). Selective discrimination against female children in rural Punjab, India. Population and Development Review, 13(1), 77-100.

Dixon, R.B. (1975). Women’s rights and fertility. Reports on Population/Family Planning, 17, 20.

Dube, L. (1988). On the construction of gender: Hindu girls in patrilineal India. Economic and Political Weekly, 23(18), WS11-WS19.

Dyson, T., and Moore, M. (1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review, 9(1), 35-60.


Goldstein, R.L. (1970). Students in saris: College education in the lives of young Indian women. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 5(3), 192-201.


International Institute for Population Sciences. (1995). National Family Health Survey: India 1992-93. Bombay, India: Author.

International Institute for Population Sciences and ORC Macro. (2000). National Family Health Survey: India 1998-99. Mumbai, India: Author.


Jain, A., and Nag, M. (1986). Importance of female primary education for fertility reduction in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 21(36), 1602-1608.

Jejeebhoy, S. (2000). Women’s autonomy in rural India: Its dimensions, determinants, and the influence of context. In H. Presser and G. Sen (Eds.), Female empowerment and demographic processes (pp. 204-238). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.

Jejeebhoy, S., and Sathar, Z. (2001). Women’s autonomy in India and Pakistan: The influence of religion and region. Population and Development Review, 27(4), 687-712.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement