Bakker, C., M. Rutten, E. van Doorslaer, K. Bennett, et al. 1994. Feasibility of Utility Assessment by Rating Scale and Standard Gamble in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis and Fibromyalgia. Journal of Rheumatology 21:269–274.

Balaban, D.J., P.C. Sagi, N.I. Goldfarb, and S. Nettler. 1986. Weights for Scoring the Quality of Well-Being Instrument Among Rheumatoid Arthritics: A Comparison to the General Population Weights. Medical Care 24:973–980.

Bedford, Tim, and Roger M. Cooke. 2001. Probabilistic Risk Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bell, Chaim M., Richard H. Chapman, Patricia W. Stone, Eileen A. Sandberg, and Peter J. Neumann. 2001. An Off-the-Shelf Help List: A Comprehensive Catalog of Preference Scores From Published Cost-Utility Analyses. Medical Decision Making 21(4):288–294.

Bleichrodt, Han, and Magnus Johannesson. 1997. Standard Gamble, Time Trade-Off and Rating Scale: Experimental Results on the Ranking Properties of QALYs. Journal of Health Economics 16(2):155–175.

Bleichrodt, Han, Jose L. Pinto, and Peter P. Wakker. 2001. Making Descriptive Use of Prospect Theory to Improve the Prescriptive Use of Expected Utility. Management Science 47(11):1498–1514.

Bleichrodt, Han, Jose L. Pinto, and Jose M. Abellan-Perpinan. 2003. A Consistency Test of the Time Trade-Off. Journal of Health Economics 22:1037–1052.

Boyle, M.H., G.W. Torrance, J.C. Sinclair, and S.P. Horwood. 1983. Economic Evaluation of Neonatal Intensive Care of Very Low-Birthweight Infants. New England Journal of Medicine 308(22):1330–1337.

Brauer, Carmen, and Peter Neumann. 2004. A Catalogue of Preference Weights Used in Published Cost–Utility Analyses, 1998–2001. Prepared for the Institute of Medicine Committee to Evaluate Measures of Health Benefits for Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation.

———. 2005. Using an Online Catalog of Utility Scores From Published Cost–Utility Analyses to Estimate Quality of Life Impacts in the EPA Case Study. Prepared for the Institute of Medicine Committee to Evaluate Measures of Health Benefits for Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation.

Brazier, John, Mark Deverill, C. Green, R. Harper, and A. Booth. 1999a. A Review of the Use of Health Status Measures in Economic Evaluation. Health Technology Assessment 3(9):1–164.

Brazier, John, Mark Deverill, and Colin Green. 1999b. A Review of the Use of Health Status Measures in Economic Evaluation. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 4(3):174–184.

Brazier, John, Jennifer Roberts, and Mark Deverill. 2002. The Estimation of a Preference-Based Measure of Health From the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics 21:271–292.

Brazier, John E., and Jennifer Roberts. 2004. The Estimation of a Preference-Based Measure of Health From the SF-12. Medical Care 42(9):851–859.

Brazier, John E., T.P. Usherwood, R. Harper, and K. Thomas. 1998. Deriving a Preference Based Single Index From the UK SF-36 Health Survey. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 51(11):1115–1129.

Briggs, Andrew. 2001. Handling Uncertainty in Economic Evaluation and Presenting the Results. In: Drummond, Michael, and McGuire, Alistair, eds. Economic Evaluation in Health Care: Merging Theory with Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 172–214.

Briggs, Andrew H., Ron Goeree, Gord Blackhouse, and Bernie J. O’Brien. 2002. Probabilistic Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness Models: Choosing Between Treatment Strategies for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Medical Decision Making 22(4):290–308.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement