References

Adeola, F. 1994. Environmental hazards, health and racial inequity in hazardous waste distribution. Environ and Behav 26(1):99–126.

Adkins, H. E., Jr., J. M. Cuta, and B. J. Koeppel. 2005. Spent Fuel Transportation Package Response to the Baltimore Tunnel Fire Scenario (draft for public comment). NUREG/CR-6886. Prepared for Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Richland, WA.

AEC (Atomic Energy Commission). 1972. Environmental Survey of Transportation of Radioactive Materials to and from Nuclear Power Plants. WASH-1238. Washington, DC: Atomic Energy Commission.

American Bar Association. 2004. Environmental Justice for All: A Fifty State Survey of Legislation, Policies and Initiatives. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association and Hastings College of the Law.

Ammerman, D. J., and K. W. Ginn. 2004. Collapse of the cypress street viaduct—effect on a postulated spent fuel truck cask. Proceedings of the INMM 45th Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL, July 18–22.

Ammerman, D. J., J. A. Koski, C. L. Lopez, A. Kapoor, K. Sorenson, J. Sprung, and R. Luna. 2002. Comparison of Selected Highway and Railway Accidents to the 10CFR71 Hypothetical Accident Sequence and NRC Risk Assessments. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Transportation Program. Albuquerque, NM.

Ammerman, D. J., C. L. Lopez, J. A. Koski, and A. Kapoor. 2003. Comparison of selected highway and railway accidents to the 10CFR71 hypothetical accident sequence and NRC risk assessments. Paper presented at 44th Institute of Nuclear Materials Management Annual Meeting, Phoenix, AZ, July 3–17.

Ashford, N., and K. Rest. 1999. Public Participation in Contaminated Communities. Prepared for Center for Technology, Policy, and Industrial Development, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, MA.


Bajwa, C. S. 2002. An Analysis of a Spent Fuel Transportation Cask Under Severe Fire Accident Conditions. Proceedings, Transportation, Storage, and Disposal of Radioactive Materials, PVP-Vol. 469, ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, August.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 273
Going the Distance? The Safe Transport of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste in the United States References Adeola, F. 1994. Environmental hazards, health and racial inequity in hazardous waste distribution. Environ and Behav 26(1):99–126. Adkins, H. E., Jr., J. M. Cuta, and B. J. Koeppel. 2005. Spent Fuel Transportation Package Response to the Baltimore Tunnel Fire Scenario (draft for public comment). NUREG/CR-6886. Prepared for Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Richland, WA. AEC (Atomic Energy Commission). 1972. Environmental Survey of Transportation of Radioactive Materials to and from Nuclear Power Plants. WASH-1238. Washington, DC: Atomic Energy Commission. American Bar Association. 2004. Environmental Justice for All: A Fifty State Survey of Legislation, Policies and Initiatives. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association and Hastings College of the Law. Ammerman, D. J., and K. W. Ginn. 2004. Collapse of the cypress street viaduct—effect on a postulated spent fuel truck cask. Proceedings of the INMM 45th Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL, July 18–22. Ammerman, D. J., J. A. Koski, C. L. Lopez, A. Kapoor, K. Sorenson, J. Sprung, and R. Luna. 2002. Comparison of Selected Highway and Railway Accidents to the 10CFR71 Hypothetical Accident Sequence and NRC Risk Assessments. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Transportation Program. Albuquerque, NM. Ammerman, D. J., C. L. Lopez, J. A. Koski, and A. Kapoor. 2003. Comparison of selected highway and railway accidents to the 10CFR71 hypothetical accident sequence and NRC risk assessments. Paper presented at 44th Institute of Nuclear Materials Management Annual Meeting, Phoenix, AZ, July 3–17. Ashford, N., and K. Rest. 1999. Public Participation in Contaminated Communities. Prepared for Center for Technology, Policy, and Industrial Development, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, MA. Bajwa, C. S. 2002. An Analysis of a Spent Fuel Transportation Cask Under Severe Fire Accident Conditions. Proceedings, Transportation, Storage, and Disposal of Radioactive Materials, PVP-Vol. 469, ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, August.

OCR for page 273
Going the Distance? The Safe Transport of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste in the United States Barnfield, J. H., and P. J. Donelan. 1985. Demonstration Drop Test. Pp. 79–88 in The Resistance to Impact of Spent Magnox Fuel Transport Flasks. London: Mechanical Engineering Publications. Bazant, Z. P. 2004. Scaling theory for quasibrittle structural failure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:13400–13407. Bell, B., Jr. 2001. Holden says radioactive shipment was bungled: Governor charges that federal agency broke promises on moving waste. St. Louis Post-Dispatch, November 1. Berrens, R., A. Bohara, H. Jenkins-Smith, and C. Silva. 2002. Information disclosure requirements and the effect of soil contamination on property values. J Environ Plan Manage 45:323–339. Blanchard, B., and W. Fabrycky. 2005. Systems Engineering and Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Blythe, R. A., J. D. Hart, J. C. Miles, M. Shears, and E. P. S. Tufton. 1984. The Central Electricity Generating Board Flask Test Project. IAEA-SM-286/78P. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. Bradbury, J., and K. Branch. 1999. An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Local Site-Specific Advisory Boards for U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Restoration Programs. Report PNNL-12139. Washington, DC: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Bradbury, J., K. Branch, and M. Zalesny. 1996a. Site Specific Advisory Board Initiative 1996 Evaluation Survey Results: Volume I, Summary Report. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management, Office of Intergovernmental and Public Accountability. Bradbury, J., K. Branch, and M. Zalesny. 1996b. Site Specific Advisory Board Initiative 1996 Evaluation Survey Results: Volume II, Individual Site Results. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management, Office of Intergovernmental and Public Accountability. Bradbury, J., K. Branch, and M. Zalesny. 1997a. Site Specific Advisory Board Initiative 1997 Evaluation Survey Results: Volume I, Summary Report. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management, Office of Intergovernmental and Public Accountability. Bradbury, J., K. Branch, and M. Zalesny. 1997b. Site Specific Advisory Board Initiative 1997 Evaluation Survey Results: Volume II, Individual Site Results. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management, Office of Intergovernmental and Public Accountability. Bradbury, J., K. Brach, and E. Malone. 2003. An Evaluation of DOE-EM Public Participation Programs. PNNL-14200. Prepared for Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Washington, DC. Brenner, D. J., and C. D. Elliston. 2004. Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. Radiology 232(3):735–738. Bryant, B., and P. Mohai, eds. 1992. Race and the Incidence of Environmental Hazards. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Bullard, R. D. 1990a. Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Bullard, R. D. 1990b. Ecological inequalities and the new south: Black communities under siege. J Ethnic Studies 17(4):101–115. Buren, M. A. 1998. Transportation of radioactive material: General scope of federal and state authority. Presentation at the NEI Lawyers Committee Meeting, Washington, DC, February 26. California Energy Commission. 1998. Fact Sheet on the U.S. Department of Energy Shipments of Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel via the Concord Naval Weapons Station. December 29.

OCR for page 273
Going the Distance? The Safe Transport of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste in the United States Cashwell, J. W., K. S. Neuhauser, P. C. Reardon, and G. W. McNair. 1986. Transportation Impacts of the Commercial Radioactive Waste Management Program. SAND85-2715. Prepared for Sandia National Laboratories. Albuquerque, NM. CEQ (Council on Environmental Quality). 1997. Environmental Justice: Guidance Under the National Environmental Policy Act. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President. Clark County Nuclear Waste Division. 2004. Radioactive Waste Transportation State Laws. Clark County, NV: Department of Comprehensive Planning, Nuclear Waste Division. Collins, A. H., G. T. Duncan, and K. Poole. 1985. Execution of the crash demonstration by British Rail. Pp. 205–211 in The Resistance to Impact of Spent Magnox Fuel Transport Flasks. London: Mechanical Engineering Publications. Covello, V. T., D. B. McCallum, and M. T. Pavlova, eds. 1989. Effective Risk Communication: The Role and Responsibility of Government and Nongovernment Organizations. New York: Plenum Press. Crouch, E., and R. Wilson. 1982. Risk/Benefit Analyses. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company. CSG (Council of State Governments’ Midwestern Office). 2004. Planning Guide for Shipments of Radioactive Materials through the Midwestern States. Lombard, IL: Council of State Governments. Dake, K. 1991. Orienting dispositions in the perception of risk: An analysis of contemporary worldviews and cultural biases. J Cross-Cult Psychol 22:61–82. Dake, K. 1992. Myths of nature: Culture and the social construction of risk. J Soc Issues 48:21–37. Dallard, P. R. B. 1985. Flask analytical studies. Pp. 47–64 in The Resistance to Impact of Spent Magnox Fuel Transport Flasks. London: Mechanical Engineering Publications. DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). 1980. Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Storage of U.S. Spent Nuclear Power Reactor Fuel. DOE/EIS-0015. Washington, DC. DOE. 1995a. U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Justice Strategy Executive Order 12989. On-line. Office of Environmental Management. Available at http://web.em.doe.gov/stake/envjus.html. Accessed January 2, 2004. DOE. 1995b. Programmatic Spent Nuclear Fuel Management and Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Programs Final Environmental Impact Statement. Federal Register 60:20979. April 28. DOE. 1995c. Record of Decision on the Programmatic Spent Nuclear Fuel Management and Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Environmental Restoration and Waste Management Programs Final Environmental Impact Statement. Federal Register 60:28680. June 1. DOE. 1996a. Final Environmental Impact Statement on a Proposed Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Policy Concerning Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel. DOE-EIS-0218-F. DOE. 1996b. Record of Decision for the Final Environmental Impact Statement on a Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Policy Concerning Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel. Federal Register 61:25091–25103. May 17. DOE. 1996c. Charleston: Potential Highway and Rail Routes. May 20. On-line. Available at http://web.em.gov/rod/charles.htm. DOE. 1998a. Viability Assessment of a Repository at Yucca Mountain Overview. DOE/RW-0508. Washington, DC: Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management. DOE. 1998b. Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management; Safe Routine Transportation and Emergency Response Training; Technical Assistance and Funding. Federal Register 63:23753–23766. DOE. 1999. DOE Standard—Radiological Control. DOE-STD-1098-99. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.

OCR for page 273
Going the Distance? The Safe Transport of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste in the United States DOE. 2001a. Nuclear Waste Fund Fee Adequacy: An Assessment. DOE/RW-0534. Washington, DC: Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management. DOE. 2001b. DOE and State of Missouri Reach Agreement for Spent Fuel Transportation on Interstate 70. Press release No. R-01-080. May 25. DOE. 2001c. DOE Prepared for Cross-Country Shipment of Spent Nuclear Fuel: Missouri State Officials Complete Safety Training. Press release No. R-01-95. June 15. DOE. 2001d. Analysis of the Total System Life Cycle Cost of the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Program. DOE/RW-0533. Washington, DC: Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management. DOE. 2001e. Transportation Packaging Quick Facts: Model 2000 Transport Package. Washington, DC: Office of Environmental Management. DOE. 2002a. Final Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada. DOE/EIS-0250F. Washington, DC: Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management. DOE. 2002b. A Resource Handbook on DOE’s Transportation Risk Assessment. DOE/EM/NTP/HB-01. Washington, DC: Office of Environmental Management. DOE. 2002c. Radioactive Material Transportation Practices Manual. DOE M 460.2-1. September 23. DOE. 2003a. U.S. Department of Energy Foreign Research Reactor Nuclear Spent Fuel Shipments Transportation Plan for Motor Carrier Transport: Savannah River Site to Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory: Revision 1. U.S. Department of Energy, Idaho Operations Office. DOE. 2003b. U.S. Department of Energy Foreign Research Reactor Nuclear Spent Fuel Shipments Transportation Plan for Rail or Motor Carrier Transport: Charleston, SC to Savannah River Site: Revision 1. U.S. Department of Energy: Savannah River Operations Office. DOE. 2003c. Strategic Plan for the Safe Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste to Yucca Mountain: A Guide to Stakeholder Interactions. Washington, DC: Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management. DOE. 2004a. Revision of the Record of Decision for a Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation Policy Concerning Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel. Federal Register 69: 69901–69903. DOE. 2004b. Table 1—Spent Nuclear Fuel Transportation Casks Available for Use at the INEEL. On-line. U.S. Department of Energy. Available at http://www.id.doe.gov/DOEID/RFPSharedLibrary/PDF/CaskSpecifications4.pdf. DOE. 2004c. Global Threat Reduction Initiative: Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel Shipments. December 7. DOE. 2004d. Record of Decision on Mode of Transportation and Nevada Rail Corridor for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada. Federal Register 69:18557–18565. April 8. DOE. 2004e. Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Alignment, Construction, and Operation of a Rail Line to a Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada. Federal Register 69:18565–18569. April 8. DOE. 2004f. Acceptance Priority Ranking and Annual Capacity Report. Washington, DC: Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management. DOE. 2005a. FRR MTR, TRIGA, and Target Receipts Quick Reference. Unpublished table. March 1. DOE. 2005b. Department of Energy Policy Statement for Use of Dedicated Trains for Waste Shipments to Yucca Mountain. Washington, DC: Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management.

OCR for page 273
Going the Distance? The Safe Transport of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste in the United States Donelan, P. J., and A. R. Dowling. 1985. The use of scale models in impact testing. Pp. 23–46 in The Resistance to Impact of Spent Magnox Fuel Transport Flasks. London: Mechanical Engineering Publications. DOT (Department of Transportation). 1980. Highway Routing of Radioactive Materials. U.S. Department of Transportation: Research and Special Programs Administration. Federal Register 45:7140–7153. DOT. 1998. Identification of Factors for Selecting Modes and Routes for Shipping High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel. Washington, DC: Research and Special Programs Administration. DOT. 2002. Transportation and Environmental Justice: Effective Practices. FHWA-EP-02-016. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration. DOT. 2004. Emergency Response Guidebook. ERG 2004. Drew, C., M. Kern, T. Martin, M. L. Blazek, M. Power, and E. Faustman. Forthcoming. The Hanford Openness Workshops: Fostering open and transparent decision making at the Department of Energy Research in Social Problems and Public Policy. DuCharme, A. R., Jr., R. E. Akins, S. L. Daniel, D. M. Ericson, Jr., B. H. Finley, N. N. Finley, P. C. Kaestner, D. D. Sheldon, J. M. Taylor, and M. S. Tierney. 1978. Transport of Radionuclides in Urban Environs: Working Draft Assessment. SAND77-1927. Prepared for Sandia National Laboratories. Albuquerque, NM. Eady, V. 2003. Environmental justice in state policy decisions. In Just Sustainabilities: Development in an Unequal World, J. Agyeman, R. D. Bullard, and B. Evans, eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Easterling, D. 1997. The vulnerability of the Nevada visitor economy to a repository at Yucca Mountain. Risk Analysis 17(5):635–647. Easterling, D., and H. Kunreuther. 1993. The vulnerability of the convention industry to the siting of a high level nuclear waste repository. Pp. 209–238 in Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste: Citizens’ Views of Repository Siting, R. E. Dunlap, M. E. Kraft, and E. A. Rosa, eds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Emit, R., R. Riggs, W. Milstead, J. Pittman, and H. Vendermolen. 2003. A prioritization of generic safety issues. NUREG-0933. Washington, DC: Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research. EO [Executive Order]. 1994. Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations. 12898. Federal Register 59:7629. February 11. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 1998a. Final Guidance for Incorporating Environmental Justice Concerns in EPA’s NEPA Compliance Analyses. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA. 1998b. Cancer Risk Coefficients for Environmental Exposure to Radionuclides. Federal Guidance Report 13. EPA 402-R-99-001. Washington, DC: Office of Radiation and Indoor Air. EPA. 1999. Cancer Risk Coefficient Estimates for Environmental Exposure to Radionuclides. Federal Guidance Report 13. Washington, DC. On-line. Available at http://www.epa.gov/radiation/federal/docs/fgr13.pdf. Accessed on April 11, 2004. Finley, N. C., D. C. Aldrich, S. L. Daniel, D. M. Ericson, C. Henning-Sachs, P. C. Kaestner, N. R. Ortiz, D. D. Sheldon, and J. M. Taylor. 1980. Transportation of Radionuclides in Urban Environs: Draft Environmental Assessment. NUREG/CR-0743 (SAND79-0369). Prepared for Sandia National Laboratories. Albuquerque, NM. Finucane, M. L., P. Slovic, C. K. Mertz, J. Flynn, and T. A. Satterfield. 2000. Gender, race, and perceived risk: The “white male” effect. Health Risk Soc 2(2):159–172. Fischer, F. 2001. Citizens, Experts and the Environment. The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

OCR for page 273
Going the Distance? The Safe Transport of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste in the United States Fischer, L. E., C. K. Chou, M. A. Gerhard, C. Y. Kimura, R. W. Martin, R. W. Mensing, M. E. Mount, and M. C. White. 1987. Shipping Container Response to Severe Highway and Railway Accident Conditions. NUREG/CR-4829 (UCID-20733). Livermore, CA: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Flynn J., P. Slovic, and C. K. Mertz. 1994. Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Anal 14(6):1101–1108. Flynn, J. H., C. K. Mertz, and P. Slovic. 1998. Results of a 1997 National Nuclear Waste Transportation Survey. On-line. Eugene, OR: Decision Research. Available at http://www.state.nv.us/nucwaste/trans/1dr01a.htm. Accessed July 27, 2004. FRA (Federal Railroad Administration). 1998. U.S. Department of Transportation, Safety Compliance Oversight Plan for Rail Transportation of High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel: Ensuring the Safe, Routine Rail Transportation of Foreign Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel. Washington, DC: Federal Railroad Administration. FRA. 2005. Use of Dedicated Trains for Transportation of High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel: Report to Congress. Washington, DC: Federal Railroad Administration. Freudenberg, W. 1993. Risk and recreancy: Weber, the Division of Labor, and the rationality of risk perceptions. Soc Forces 71:909–932. Freudenburg, W. 2003. Institutional failure and the organizational amplification of risks: The need for a closer look. In The Social Amplification of Risk, N. Pidgeon, R. Kasperson, and P. Slovic, eds. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. Frewer, L. 2003. Trust, transparency, and social context: Implications for the social amplification of risk. In The Social Amplification of Risk, N. Pidgeon, R. Kasperson, and P. Slovic, eds. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. Friedberg, W., and K. Copeland. 2003. What Aircrews Should Know about Their Occupational Exposure to Ionizing Radiation. DOT/FAA/AM-03/16. Prepared for FAA Office of Aerospace Medicine and Civil Aerospace Medical Institute. Washington, DC. GAO (Government Accountability Office). 1983. Siting of Hazardous Waste Landfills and their Correlation with Racial and Economic Status of Surrounding Communities. GAO-RCED-83-168, B-211461. Washington, DC: GPO. GAO. 1994. Nuclear Nonproliferation: Concerns with U.S. Delays in Accepting Foreign Research Reactors’ Spent Fuel. Washington, DC: Resources Community and Economic Development Division. GAO. 2003. Spent Nuclear Fuel: Options Exist to Further Enhance Security. GAO-03-426. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office. GAO. 2004a. Nuclear Proliferation: DOE Needs to Take Action to Further Reduce the Use of Weapons-Usable Uranium in Civilian Research Reactors. GAO-04-807. Washington, DC: Natural Resources and Environment. GAO. 2004b. Nuclear Proliferation: DOE Needs to Consider Options to Accelerate the Return of Weapons-Usable Uranium from Other Countries to the United States and Russia. GAO-05-57. Washington, DC: Natural Resources and Environment. Garabedian, A. S., D. S. Dunn, and A. H. Chowdhury. 2002. Analysis of Rail Car Components Exposed to a Tunnel Fire Environment. CNWRA 2003–2004. Prepared for Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses. San Antonio, TX. Gawande, K., and H. Jenkins-Smith. 2001. Nuclear waste transport and residential property values: Estimating the effects of perceived risks. J Environ Econ Manag 42:207–233. Goldman, B. A., and L. Fitton. 1994. Toxic Wastes and Race Revisited: An Update of the 1987 Report on the Racial and Socioeconomic Characteristics of Communities with Hazardous Waste Sites. Prepared for the Center for Policy Alternatives, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and United Church of Christ. Washington, DC.

OCR for page 273
Going the Distance? The Safe Transport of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste in the United States Gonzales, A., J. D. Pierce, and D. R. Stenberg. 1986. Target hardness comparisons with the IAEA unyielding target. IAEA-SM-286/114P. Pp. 545–551 in International Symposium on the Packaging and Transport of Radioactive Materials, Davos, Switzerland, June 16–20. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. Gregory, R., J. Flynn, and P. Slovic. 1995. Technological stigma. Am Sci 83(3):220–223. Greiner, M., N. R. Chalasani, and A. Suo-Anttila. 2005. Thermal protection provided by impact limiters to containment seal within a truck package. Proceedings of 2005 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference, Denver, CO, July 17–21. Gusterson, H. 2000. How not to construct a radioactive waste incinerator. Sci Technol Hum Val 25(3):332–351. Hall, J. 2003. Remarks of Jim Hall on behalf of the State of Nevada. Remarks at Transportation of Radioactive Waste, Meeting 2, Las Vegas, NV, July 25. Hancock, D. 2004. WIPP transportation information issues. Presentation at National Academies Committee on Transportation of Radioactive Waste, Meeting 6, Albuquerque, NM, July 22. Hart, J. D., R. A. Blythe, I. Milne, and M. Shears. 1985a. Rail crash demonstration scenarios. Pp. 115–124 in The Resistance to Impact of Spent Magnox Fuel Transport Flasks. London: Mechanical Engineering Publications. Hart, J. D., R. A. Blythe, I. Milne, and M. Shears. 1985b. A summary of the CEGB’s flask accident impact studies. Pp. 233–249 in The Resistance to Impact of Spent Magnox Fuel Transport Flasks. London: Mechanical Engineering Publications. Holden, B. 2001. Letter from the Honorable Bob Holden, Governor, State of Missouri, to the Honorable Spencer Abraham, Secretary of Energy, October 23, 2001. http://www.ewg.org/reports/nuclearwaste/faq/faq_setroutes.php. HSK (Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate). 1998. Surface Contamination of Nuclear Spent Fuel Transports: Common Report of the Competent Authorities of France, Germany, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Switzerland: Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate. Huerta, M. 1977. Analysis, Scale Modeling, and Full Scale Tests of a Truck Spent-Nuclear-Fuel Shipping System in High Velocity Impacts Against a Rigid Barrier. SAND77-0270. Prepared for Sandia National Laboratories. Albuquerque, NM. Huerta, M. 1981. Analysis, Scale Modeling, and Full Scale Test of a Railcar and Spent-Nuclear-Fuel Shipping Package in a High-Velocity Impact Against a Rigid Barrier. SAND78-0458. Prepared for Sandia National Laboratories. Albuquerque, NM. Huerta, M., and H. R. Yoshimura. 1983. A Study and Full-Scale Test of a High-Velocity Grade-Crossing Simulated Accident of a Locomotive and a Spent-Nuclear-Fuel Shipping Package. SAND79-2291. Prepared for Sandia National Laboratories. Albuquerque, NM. Huizenga, D. G., T. P. Mustin, E. C. Saris, and J. E. Reilly. 1999. Moving into the 21st century—The United States’ Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel Acceptance Program. Presentation at the 22nd International Meeting on Reduced Enrichment for Research and Test Reactors, Budapest, October 3–8. Hunsperger, W. 2001. Effects of the Rocky Flats Nuclear Weapons Plant on neighboring property values. Pp. 157–171 in Risk, Media, and Stigma: Understanding Public Challenges to Modern Science and Technology, J. Flynn, P. Slovic, and H. Kunreuther, eds. Sterling, VA: Earthscan Publications, Ltd. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). 2000. Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Materials. Safety Standards Series No. TS-R-1 (ST-1, Revised). Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA. 2002. Advisory Material for the IAEA Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material. Safety Standards Series No. TS-G-1.1 (ST-2). Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency.

OCR for page 273
Going the Distance? The Safe Transport of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste in the United States IAEA. 2005a. Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material, 2005 Edition. Safety Standards Series No. TS-R-1 (ST-1, Revised). Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA. 2005b. Radiological Aspects of Non-Fixed Contamination of Packages and Conveyances. IAEA-TECDOC-1449. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection). 1991. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press. IME (The Institution of Mechanical Engineers). 1985. The Resistance to Impact of Spent Magnox Fuel Transport Flasks. London: Mechanical Engineering Publications. Intertech Services Corporation. 2001. In Search of Equity: A Preliminary Assessment of the Impacts of Developing and Operating the Yucca Mountain Repository on Lincoln County and the City of Caliente, Nevada. Pioche, NV: Intertech Services Corporation. IOM (Institute of Medicine). 1999. Toward Environmental Justice: Research, Education, and Health Policy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Jacobson, S. K. 1999. Communication Skills for Conservation Professionals. Chicago, IL: Island Press. JAI Corporation. 2005. Shipping and Storage Cask Data for Commercial Spent Nuclear Fuel. Fairfax, VA: JAI Corporation. Jefferson, R. M., and H. R. Yoshimura. 1977. Crash Testing of Nuclear Fuel Shipping Containers. SAND77-1462. Prepared for Sandia National Laboratories. Albuquerque, NM. Jenkins-Smith, H., and W. Smith. 1994. Ideology, culture, and risk perception. In Politics, Policy and Culture, D. Coyle and R. Ellis, eds. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Johnson, B. 2003. Are some risks comparisons more effective under conflict? A replication and extension of Roth et al. Risk Anal 23:767–780. Johnson, B. 2004. Risk comparisons, conflict, and risk acceptability claims. Risk Anal 24(1): 131–145. Johnson, B., and C. Chess. 2003. How reassuring are risk comparisons to pollution standards and emission limits? Risk Anal 23(5):999–1007. Kaplan, S., and B. J. Garrick. 1981. On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal 1(1): 11–27. Kasperson, R., N. Jhaveri, and J. X. Kasperson. 2001. Stigma and the social amplification of risk: Toward a framework analysis. Pp. 9–27 in Risk, Media, and Stigma: Understanding Public Challenges to Modern Science and Technology, J. Flynn, P. Slovic, and H. Kunreuther, eds. Sterling, VA: Earthscan Publications, Ltd. Kasperson, R., O. Renn, P. Slovic, H. Brown, J. Emel, R. Goble, J. Kasperson, and S. Ratick. 1988. The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Anal 8:177–187. Kasperson, R. E., ed. 1983. Equity Issues in Radioactive Waste Management. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn and Hain. Ketkar, K. 1992. Hazardous waste sites and property values in the State of New Jersey. Appl Econ 24:647–659. Kiel, K. 1995. Measuring the impact of the discovery and cleaning of identified hazardous waste sites on house values. Land Econ 71:428–435. Klassen, D. A. 1982. Transportation of Radioactive Material by Rail: The Special Train Issue. SAND81-1447-TTC-0226. Prepared for Sandia National Laboratories. Albuquerque, NM. Kollmuss, A., and J. Agyeman. 2002. Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Educ Res 8:239–260. Lanthrum, G. 2004. Office of National Transportation update. Presentation at National Academies Committee on Transportation of Radioactive Waste, July 21. MacGregor, D., and R. Fleming. 1996 Risk perception and symptom reporting. Risk Anal 16(6):773–783.

OCR for page 273
Going the Distance? The Safe Transport of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste in the United States MacGregor, D. G., J. Flynn, P. Slovic, and C. K. Mertz. 2002a. Perception of Radiation Exposure: Part I. Perception of Risk and Judgment of Harm. Eugene, OR: Decision Research. MacGregor, D. G., J. Flynn, C. K. Mertz, and P. Slovic. 2002b. Perception of Radiation Exposure: Part II. Communicating About Radiation Exposure and Health Effects. Eugene, OR: Decision Research. Mauro, J., and N. M. Briggs. 2005. Assessment of Variations in Radiation Exposure in the United States. EP-D-05-002. Prepared for the Environmental Protection Agency. McLean, VA: S. Cohen and Associates. McGrattan, K. B., and A. Hamins. 2003. Numerical Simulation of the Howard Street Tunnel Fire, Baltimore, Maryland, July 2001. NUREG/CR-6793. Washington, DC: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Mendelsohn, R., D. Hellerstein, M. Huguenin, R. Unsworth, and R. Brazee. 1992. Measuring hazardous waste damages with panel models. J Environ Econ Manag 22:259–271. Meredith, D., K. Wong, and R. Woodhead. 1985. Design and Planning of Engineering Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Mettler, F. A., Jr., P. W. Wiest, J. A. Locken, and C. A. Kelsey. 2000. CT scanning: Patterns of use and dose. J Radiol Prot 20:353–359. NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program). 2004. Effective Methods for Environmental Justice Assessment. NCHRP Report 532. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board. NCRP (National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements). 1987. Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States. NCRP Report 93. Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. NCRP. 1995. Principles and Application of Collective Dose in Radiation Protection. NCRP Report 121. Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. NCRP. 2001. Management of Terrorist Events Involving Radioactive Material. Scientific Committee 46-14, NCRP Report 138. Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Nevada (Nevada Agency for Nuclear Projects). 1997. Fact Sheet: Foreign Research Reactor Spent Fuel Shipments. Carson City, NV: Office of Emergency Support. Nevada. 2000. State of Nevada Comments on the U.S. Department of Energy’s Draft Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada. 2 Volumes. Carson City, NV: Nevada Agency for Nuclear Projects. Ngutter, L. K., J. M. Kofler, C. H. McCollough, and R. J. Vetter. 2001. Update on patient radiation doses at a large tertiary care medical center. Health Phys 81(5):530–535. NRC (National Research Council). 1951. Physical, Biological, and Administrative Problems Associated with the Transportation of Radioactive Substances. Report prepared by R. D. Evans for the Subcommittee on Shipment of Radioactive Substances, Committee on Nuclear Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences—National Research Council. NRC. 1957. The Disposal of Radioactive Waste on Land. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. NRC. 1984. Social and Economic Aspects of Radioactive Waste Disposal. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. NRC. 1989. Improving Risk Communication. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. NRC. 1996. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. NRC. 2003. One Step at a Time: The Staged Development of Geologic Repositories for High-Level Radioactive Waste. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

OCR for page 273
Going the Distance? The Safe Transport of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste in the United States NRC. 2005a. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII—Phase 2: Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. NRC. 2005b. Assessment of the Scientific Information for the Radiation Exposure Screening and Education Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. NRC. 2005c. Cooperative Research for Hazardous Materials Transportation: Defining the Need, Converging on Solutions. Special Report 283. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. NRC. 2005d. Safety and Security of Commercial Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage: Public Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. O’Connor, R. E. 2001. Are Fear and Stigmatization Likely, and How Do They Matter? Lessons from Research on the Likelihood of Adverse Socioeconomic Impacts form Public Perceptions of the Proposed Yucca Mountain Repository. Prepared for Jason Technologies Corporation, Las Vegas, NV. September 8. (This report is reproduced in Appendix N of the final Yucca Mountain EIS [DOE, 2002a]). Perrow, C. 1999. Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books. Peters, E., and P. Slovic. 1996. The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power. J Appl Soc Psychol 26(16):1427–1453. Pope, R. B. 2004. Historical background of the development of various requirements in the international regulations for the safe packaging and transport of radioactive material. Paper presented at the 14th International Symposium on Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Materials, Berlin, Germany, September 20–24. Pope, R. B., Z. Bernard-Bruls, and M. T. M. Brittinger. 2001. A worldwide assessment of the transport of irradiated nuclear fuel and high-level waste. Paper presented at 13th International Symposium on Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Materials, Chicago, IL, September 7. Pope, R. B., M. W. Wankerl, S. Armstrong, C. Hamberger, and S. Schmid. 1991. Historical overview of domestic spent fuel shipments—update. Pp. 1501–1508 in High Level Radioactive Waste Management: Proceedings of the Second Annual International Conference on High-Level Radioactive Waste Management, Volume 2. LaGrange Park, IL: American Nuclear Society. Renn, O. 1997. Health impacts of large releases of radionuclides: Mental health, stress, and risk perception: Insights from psychological research. Ciba F Symp 203:205–226. Resnikoff, M. 1994. Assessment of Transportation Impacts: Use of RADTRAN to Assess Risks of Severe Accidents. Unpublished manuscript. Rosa, E. A., and D. L. Clark, Jr. 1999. Historical routes to technological gridlock: Nuclear technology as prototypical vehicle. Pp. 21–57 in Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, Volume 7, W. R. Freudenburg and T. I. K. Youn, eds. Stamford, CT: JAI Press. Roth, E., M. G. Morgan, B. Fischhoff, L. Lave, and A. Bostrom. 1990. What do we know about making risk comparisons? Risk Anal 10(3):375–387. Sandoval, R. P. 1987. An Assessment of the Safety of Spent Fuel Transportation in Urban Environs. Volume II, Appendix A: High-Energy Device Evaluation Tests: Test Data. SAND82-2365. Prepared for Sandia National Laboratories. Albuquerque, NM. Sandoval, R. P., J. P. Weber, H. S. Levine, A. D. Romig, J. D. Johnson, R. E. Luna, G. J. Newton, B. A. Wong, R. W. Marshall, Jr., J. L. Alvarez, and F. Gelbard. 1983. An Assessment of the Safety of Spent Fuel Transportation in Urban Environs. SAND82-2365. Prepared for Sandia National Laboratories. Albuquerque, NM. Satterfield, T., and J. Levin. 2002. Risk Communication, Fugitive Values, and the Problem of Tradeoffs at Rocky Flats. Eugene, OR: Decision Research. Schill, K. 1996. Fuel rod decision expected. Augusta Chronicle, December 16. Schill, K. 1997. No more fuel rod appeals, Beasley says. Augusta Chronicle, January 1. Schill, K. 1998. Less foreign waste likely to go to SRS. Augusta Chronicle, February 25.

OCR for page 273
Going the Distance? The Safe Transport of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste in the United States Schrader-Frechette, K. 1995. Evaluating the expertise of experts. Risk: Health Safe Environ 6:115–126. Shepard, P., M. Northridge, S. Prakas, and G. Stover. 2002. Advancing environmental justice through community based participatory research. Environ Health Persp Suppl 110(2): 139–140. Shields, P. J. 2001. Fuel rift called “Outrageous”: Interest groups call for end to impasse. Columbia Daily Tribune, May 3. Slovic, P. 1987. Perception of risk. Science 236:280–285. Slovic, P. 1993. Perceived risk, trust and democracy. Risk Anal 13:675–682. Slovic, P. 2001a. Perception of risk from radiation. Pp. 264–274 in The Perception of Risk. London: Earthscan Publications, Ltd. Slovic, P. 2001b. Perception of risk. Pp. 220–231 in The Perception of Risk. London: Earthscan Publications, Ltd. Slovic, P., J. Flynn, and R. Gregory. 1994. Stigma happens: Social problems in the siting of nuclear waste facilities. Risk Anal 14(4):773–777. Slovic, P., J. Flynn, and M. Layman. 2001. Perceived risk, trust and the politics of nuclear waste. Pp. 275–284 in The Perception of Risk. London: Earthscan Publications, Ltd. Slovic, P., M. Layman, N. Krause, J. Flynn, J. Chalmers, and G. Gesell. 1991. Perceived risk, stigma, and the potential economic impacts of a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada. Risk Anal 11:683–696. Sprung, J. L., D. J. Ammermann, N. L. Breivik, R. J. Dukart, F. L. Kanipe, J. A. Koski, G. S. Mills, K. S. Neuhauser, H. D. Radloff, R. F. Weiner, H. R. Yoshimura. 2000. Reexamination of Spent Fuel Shipment Risk Estimates. NUREG/CR-6672 (SAND2000-0234). Prepared for Sandia National Laboratories. Albuquerque, NM. Sprung, J. L., D. J. Ammerman, J. A. Koski, and R. F. Weiner. 2001. Spent Nuclear Fuel Transportation Package Performance Study Issues Report. NUREG/CR-6768 (SAND2001-0821P). Prepared for Sandia National Laboratories. Albuquerque, NM. SSEB (Southern States Energy Board). 1994. Transuranic Waste Transportation Handbook. On-line. Norcross, GA: Southern States Energy Board. Available at http://www.sseb.org/publications/truwaste94.pdf. Steinman, R. L., and K. J. Kearfoot. 2000. A comparison of the RADTRAN 5 and RISKIND 1. 11 incident-free dose models. Proceedings of Waste Management 2000 Symposium, Tucson, February 27–March 2. Steinman, R. L., R. F. Weiner, and K. J. Kearfoot. 2002. A comparison of transient dose model predictions and experimental measurements. Health Phys 83(4):504–511. Supko, E. 2000. Estimated U.S. Used Nuclear Fuel Shipments Regulated by NRC, 1964–2000. Washington, DC: Energy Resources International, Inc. TEC (Transportation External Coordination Working Group). 2002. Best Practices for DOE’s Radioactive Materials Transportation Public Information Programs. On-line. Transportation External Coordination Working Group. Available at http://www.ntp.doegov/tec/comm/BestPractices.pdf. Accessed February 2, 2002. Tuler, S. 2002. Radiation Risk Perception and Communication: A Case Study of the Fernald Environmental Management Project. SERI Report 5. Greenfield, MA: Social and Environmental Research Institute. UER (Urban Environmental Research, LLC). 2000. Property Value Impacts from the Shipment of High-Level Nuclear Waste Through Clark County, Nevada. Scottsdale, AZ: Urban Environmental Research, LLC. UER. 2001. Moapa Band of Paiute Indians: Governmental and Fiscal Impact Report Related to the Shipments of High-Level Nuclear Wastes. Scottsdale, AZ: Urban Environmental Research, LLC.

OCR for page 273
Going the Distance? The Safe Transport of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste in the United States UER. 2002. Tribal Concerns About the Yucca Mountain Repository: An Ethnographic Investigation of the Moapa Band of Paiutes and the Las Vegas Paiute Colony. Scottsdale, AZ: Urban Environmental Research, LLC. UK Department of Transport, Railway Inspectorate. 1986. Report on the Derailment and Fire That Occurred on 20th December 1984 at Summit Tunnel. London: HMSO. Available at http://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/documents/DoT_Summit1984.pdf?PHPSESSID=b050a9414e139d0ac06638a0fd717575 United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice. 1987. Toxic Wastes and Race in the United States: A National Report on the Racial and Socio-Economic Characteristics of Communities with Hazardous Waste Sites. New York: United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice. UNMIPP (University of New Mexico Institute for Public Policy). 2004. Policy Implications of Public Survey Work on Radioactive Waste Transportation to the WIPP Site. Washington, DC: National Academies, Office of News and Public Information. UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation). 2000. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly. USNRC (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission). 1977. Final Environmental Statement on the Transportation of Radioactive Material by Air and Other Modes. NUREG-0170. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. USNRC. 1978. Design Criteria for the Structural Analysis of Shipping Package Containment Vessels, Regulatory Guide 7.6. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. USNRC. 1998. Public Information Circular for Shipments of Irradiated Reactor Fuel. NUREG-0725, Revision 13. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. USNRC. 2003a. Evaluation of the Effects of the Baltimore Tunnel Fire on Rail Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel. SECY-03-0002. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. USNRC. 2003b. Cladding Considerations for the Transportation and Storage of Spent Fuel. Interim Staff Guidance 11, Revision 3. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Spent Fuel Project Office. USNRC. 2003c. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Package Performance Study Test Protocols: Draft for Public Comment. NUREG-1768. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. USNRC. 2004a. Compatibility with IAEA transportation safety standards (TS-R-1) and other transportation safety amendments; final rule. 10 CFR 71. Federal Register 69(16): 3697–3814. USNRC. 2004b. Demonstration Test Plan for Full-Scale Spent Nuclear Fuel Rail Transportation Cask Testing Under the Package Performance Study. SECY-04-0135. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. USNRC. 2004c. Options for Full-Scale Spent Nuclear Fuel Transportation Cask Testing Under the Package Performance Study. SECY-04-0029. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. USNRC. 2004d. Staff Requirements—SECY-04-0135—Demonstration Test Plan for Full-Scale Spent Nuclear Fuel Rail Transportation Cask Testing Under the Package Performance Study. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. USNRC. 2004e. Effective Risk Communication: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Guidelines for External Risk Communication. NUREG/BR-0308. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. USNRC. 2004f. The Technical Basis for the NRC’s Guidelines for External Risk Communication. NUREG/CR-6840. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

OCR for page 273
Going the Distance? The Safe Transport of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste in the United States USNRC. 2005a. Details and Projected Cost of a Demonstration Test of a Full-Scale Spent Nuclear Fuel Rail Transportation Cask Under the Package Performance Study. SECY-05-0051. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. USNRC. 2005b. Staff Requirements—SECY-05-0051—Details and Projected Cost of a Demonstration Test of a Full-Scale Spent Nuclear Fuel Rail Transportation Cask Under the Package Performance Study. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. USNRC. 2005c. Backgrounder: Research and Test Reactors. On-line. Available at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/research-reactors-bg.pdf. Vaughn, E. 1995. The significance of socioeconomic and ethnic diversity for the risk communication process. Risk Anal 15(2):169–180. Vaughan, E., and B. Nordenstam. 1991. The perception of environmental risks among ethnically diverse groups in the United States. J Cross-Cult Psychol 22:29–60. Vaughan, E., and M. Seifert. 1992. Variability in the framing of risk issues. J Soc Issues 48(4):119–135. Viebrock, J. M., and N. Mote. 1992. Near-Site Transportation Infrastructure: Final Report. Chicago Operations Office: U.S. Department of Energy. Viebrock, J. M., N. Mote, and R. B. Pope. 1992. Facility Interface Capability Assessment (FICA) Summary Report. ORNL/SUB/86-97393/7. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Waddoups. I. G. 1975. Air Drop of Shielded Radioactive Material Containers. SAND75-0276. Prepared for Sandia National Laboratories. Albuquerque, NM. Watson, S., and A. Jones. 2004. Radiological Consequences Resulting from Accidents and Incidents Involving the Transport of Radioactive Materials in the UK—2003 Review. On-line. National Radiological Protection Board Report NRPB-W64. Available at http://www.hpa.org.uk/radiation/publications/w_series_reports/2004/nrpb_w64.htm. Webler, T. 2002. Low dose risk perception and communication: A case study of the Tritium controversy at Brookhaven National Laboratory. On-line. Greenfield, MA: Social and Environmental Research Institute. Weiner, R. F., and G. S. Mills. 1999. Relative Risks of Transporting Spent TRIGA Fuels by Four Different Routes. Prepared for Sandia National Laboratories. Albuquerque, NM. Weiner, R. F., and H. F. Tenn. 1999. Transportation Accidents and Incidents Involving Radioactive Materials (1971–1998). Milestone Report to Department of Energy National Transportation Program. Prepared for Sandia National Laboratories. Albuquerque, NM. WGA (Western Governors’ Association). 2003. WIPP Transportation Safety Program Implementation Guide. On-line. Denver, CO: Western Governors’ Association. Available at http://www.westgov.org/wga/initiatives/wipp/wipp-pig03.pdf. WGA. 2005. Policy Resolution 02-05: Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste, June 25, 2002. On-line. Available at http://www.westgov.org/wga/policy/05/spent-nuke.pdf. WIEB (Western Interstate Energy Board). 1991. Rail Primer: Legal, Technical and Business Aspects of Rail Transportation (Revised). Denver, CO: Western Interstate Energy Board. Williams, B. L., S. Brown, M. Greenberg, and M. A. Kahn. 1999. Risk perception in context: The Savannah River Site stakeholder study. Risk Anal 19(6):1019–1033. Zimmermann, R. 1993. Social equity and environmental risk. Risk Anal 13(6):649–666.

OCR for page 273
Going the Distance? The Safe Transport of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste in the United States This page intentionally left blank.