The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
The Fuel Tax and Alternatives for Transportation Funding: Special Report 285
FHWA. 2004. Highway Statistics 2003. U.S. Department of Transportation.
Fischer, J.W. 2004. Highway and Transit Program Reauthorization Legislation in the 2nd Session, 108thCongress. Congressional Research Service, April 21 (update).
FTA. 2004. Trends in the Flexible Funds Program: Annual Status Report 2002. U.S. Department of Transportation.
GAO. 2004a. Federal-Aid Highways: Trends, Effect on State Spending, and Options for Future ProgramDesign.
GAO. 2004b. Surface Transportation: Many Factors Affect Investment Decisions. June.
Gramlich, E. 1990. How Should Public Infrastructure Be Financed? In Is There a Shortfall in PublicCapital Investment?(A. Munnell, ed.), Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Boston, Mass.
Metro Funding Panel. 2004. Report of the Metro Funding Panel: Final Draft for Public Release andComment: Key Findings. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Dec. 17.
Oates, W.E. 1999. An Essay on Fiscal Federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 37, Sept., pp. 1120–1149.
ODOT. 2004. Mileage Tax Rates. July.
Parry, I.W.H. 2001. Finding the Funds to Pay for Our Transportation Crisis: A Look at Options for Solving Washington, D.C.’s Traffic Woes. Resources, Issue 144, Summer, pp. 17–19.
Peters, M. 2002. Statement of Mary E. Peters, Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, Before the Committee on Finance, United States Senate: Hearing on Schemes, Scams, and Cons: Fuel Tax Fraud. Senate Finance Committee, July 17.
Puentes, R. 2004. Cement and Pork Don’t Mix. MetroView, Brookings, May 10.
Road User Fee Task Force. 2003. Report to the 72nd Oregon Legislative Assembly on the PossibleAlternatives to the Current System of Taxing Highway Use Through Motor Vehicle Fuel Taxes. March.
Rufolo, A.M., and R.L. Bertini. 2003. Designing Alternatives to State Motor Fuel Taxes. TransportationQuarterly, Vol. 57, No. 1, Fall, pp. 33–46.
Rufolo, A.M., L. Bronfman, and E. Kuhner. 2000. Effect of Oregon’s Axle-Weight-Distance Tax Incentive. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.1732, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 63–69.
TRB. 2002. Special Report 267: Regulation of Weights, Lengths, and Widths of Commercial Motor Vehicles. National Academies, Washington, D.C.
USDOT. 1997. 1997 Federal Highway Cost Allocation Study. Aug.
USDOT. 2004. Report to Congress on Public–Private Partnerships. Dec.
Utt, R.D. 2003. Proposal to Turn the Federal Highway Program Back to the States Would Relieve Traffic Congestion. Backgrounder, No. 1709, Heritage Foundation, Washington, D.C., Nov. 21.