other finance practices. Finally, Chapter 7 presents the committee’s conclusions and recommendations.



CRC Citizens Research Council of Michigan

CTI Commission on Transportation Investment (California)

TRB Transportation Research Board

AAA Mid-Atlantic. 2005. Maryland’s Transportation Network.

CRC. 1996. Michigan Highway Finance and Governance: In Brief. Nov.

CRC. 1997. Michigan Highway Finance and Governance. May.

CRC. 1998. Michigan Highway Finance and Governance: A One-Year Report Card.

CTI. 1996. Final Report. Jan.

Forkenbrock, D.J., and J.G. Kuhl. 2002. A New Approach to Assessing Road User Charges. Public Policy Center, University of Iowa.

Orski, C.K. 2004. Two Senior Federal Transportation Officials Share Their Views on the Future Federal Role in Transportation Financing. Innovation Briefs, Vol. 15, No. 5, July–Aug.

Reno, A.T., and J.R. Stowers. 1995. NCHRP Report 377: Alternatives to Motor Fuel Taxes for FinancingSurface Transportation Improvements. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.

Road User Fee Task Force. 2003. Report to the 72nd Oregon Legislative Assembly on the PossibleAlternatives to the Current System of Taxing Highway Use Through Motor Vehicle Fuel Taxes. March.

TRB. 1996. Special Report 246: Paying Our Way: Estimating Marginal Social Costs of FreightTransportation. National Research Council, Washington, D.C.

The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement