National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$56.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Scientific Review of EPA's Standards (2006)
Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology (BEST)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix C Ecologic and Partially Ecologic Studies in Epidemiology." Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Scientific Review of EPA's Standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2006.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
441
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Scientific Review of EPA’S Standards

ecologic exposure variable is the fraction exposed in the group (aggregated from dichotomous exposures at the individual level). Nondifferential exposure misclassification within groups tends to produce bias away from the null as in ecologic studies. Although bias magnification (see list above) can occur, the amount of bias tends to be intermediate between a fully ecologic study and a fully individual study (at least in certain cases that have been analyzed). Because covariate information is collected at the individual level, the ability to control for confounding can be much better than with purely ecologic studies. For more discussions of these issues, see Webster (2000, 2002) and Björk and Strömberg (2002).

In sum, semi-individual studies are generally more trustworthy than fully ecologic studies. Studies using exposure variables based on continuous individual-level exposures are preferable to those based on dichotomous individual-level exposures.

Page
441