Cover Image

Not for Sale



View/Hide Left Panel

In developing these ratings, committee members drew on their extensive expertise in biological weapons research and its peaceful applications, along with years of experience with biological weapons institutes in the Former Soviet Union. They also used their familiarity with a wide range of U.S. bioscientists to identify potential collaborators. A list of committee members is contained in Attachment 3.


The committee understands that the funding decision for each proposal is DTRA’s responsibility, based on the proposal’s fit with DTRA’s research priorities and other factors. Some proposals for research that is scientifically important but outside the area of DTRA’s interest may more appropriately be referred to other agencies. Others rated highly for scientific importance, but lacking in one or more of the other evaluation criteria, may be appropriate for further development and resubmission. Research proposals that are viewed by the committee as of very high technical risk given the constraints of the state of the science have not received high ratings.


We hope these assessments will be helpful to DTRA in making funding decisions in this critical area of research collaboration.

Sincerely,



David R. Franz, Chair

Committee on the Review of Research
Proposals for Cooperation with Former
Soviet Biological Weapons Personnel and
Institutes



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement