National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Glossary
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Department of Energy's Genomics: GTL Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11581.
×

References

Armbrust, E.V., J.A. Berges, C. Bowler, B.R. Green, D. Martinez, N.H. Putnam, S. Zhou, A.E. Allen, K.E. Apt, M. Bechner, M.A. Brzezinski, B.K. Chaal, A. Chiovitti, A.K. Davis, M.S. Demarest, J.C. Detter, T. Glavina, D. Goodstein, M.Z. Hadi, U. Hellsten, M. Hildebrand, B.D. Jenkins, J. Jurka, V.V. Kapitonov, N. Kröger, W.W.Y. Lau, T.W. Lane, F.W. Larimer, J.C. Lippmeier, S. Lucas, M. Medina, A. Montsant, M. Obornik, M.S. Parker, B. Palenik, G.J. Pazour, P.M. Richardson, T.A. Rynearson, M.A. Saito, D.C. Schwartz, K. Thamatrakoln, K. Valentin, A. Vardi, F.P. Wilkerson, and D.S. Rokhsar. 2004. The genome of the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana: ecology, evolution, and metabolism. Science 306:79-86.

ASM (American Society for Microbiology). 2001. Global Environmental Change. Microbial Contributions. Microbal Solutions. American Academy of Microbiology, Washington, DC.

ASM. 2004. The Global Genome Question: Microbes as the Key to Understanding Evolution and Ecology. American Academy of Microbiology, Washington, DC.


BERAC (Biological and Environmental Research Advisory Committee). 2000. Bringing the genome to life: Energy related biology in the new genomic world. Accessed online 11/21/05 at http://www.sc.doe.gov/ober/berac/genome-to-life-rpt.html.

Biomass R&D Technical Advisory Committee. 2002. Roadmap for biomass technologies in the United States. Accessed online 11/21/05 at http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:0GE_a5SC4gYJ:www.bioproducts-bioenergy.gov/pdfs/FinalBiomassRoadmap.pdf+roadmap+for+biomass+technologies&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1.

Bonifati, V., P. Rizzu, M.J. van Baren, O. Schaap, G.J. Breedveld, E. Krieger, M.C. Dekker, F. Squitieri, P. Ibanez, M. Joosse, J.W. van Dongen, N. Vanacore, J.C. van Swieten, A. Brice, G. Meco, C.M. van Duijn, B.A. Oostra, and P. Heutink. 2003. Mutations in the DJ-1 gene associated with autosomal recessive early-onset Parkinsonism. Science 299(5604):256-259.

Business Communication Company, Inc. 2004. Global market for industrial enzymes to reach $2.4 million by 2009. Accessed online 11/17/05 at http://www.bccresearch.com/editors/RC-147U.html.


COV (Committee of Visitors for the Review of the Environmental Remediation Sciences Division). 2004. Report to the Biological and Environmental Advisory Committee (BERAC). Accessed online 12/13/05 at http://www.sc.doe.gov/ober/berac/ERSDCOV.pdf.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Department of Energy's Genomics: GTL Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11581.
×

Dai Z., B.S. Hooker, D.B. Anderson, and S.R. Thomas. 2000. Improved plant-based production of E1 endoglucanase using potato: expression optimization and tissue targeting. Molecular breeding 6:277-285.

Daniels, R. 2005. The metagenomics of soil. Nature Reviews Microbiology 3(6):470-478.

DeLong, E.F. and D.M. Karl. 2005. Genomic perspectives in microbial oceanography. Nature 437:336-342.

Din, S.-Y., S. Smith, Q. Xu, J. Sugiyama, M. Jones, G. Rumbles, E.A. Bayer, and M.E. Himmel. 2005. Ordered arrays of quantum dots using cellulosomal proteins. Industrial Biotechnology 1:198-206.

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). 2000. On the Shoulders of Giants: Private Sector Leverages HGP Successes. Human Genome News Vol. 11, No. 1-2. The U.S. Department of Energy, Germantown.

DOE. 2002. Innovative approaches for cleaning and treating hazardous wastes at DOE sites. Accessed online 12/13/05 at http://doegenomestolife.org/cleanup.pdf.

DOE. 2003. DOE: Genomics: GTL Contractor-grantee workshop I. The U.S. Department of Energy, Germantown.

DOE. 2004. DOE: Genomics: GTL Contractor-grantee workshop II. The U.S. Department of Energy, Germantown.

DOE. 2005a. Mission. Accessed online 10/10/05 at http://www.doe.gov/engine/content.do?BT_CODE=ABOUTDOE.

DOE. 2005b. DOE: Genomics: GTL roadmap. The U.S. Department of Energy, Germantown.

DOE. 2005c. DOE: Genomics: GTL Contractor-grantee workshop III. The U.S. Department of Energy, Germantown.

DOE. 2005d. Programs with microbial research component. Accessed online 9/12/05 at http://www.microbialgenome.org/research.shtml.

DOE. 2006. About laboratory science teacher professional development. Accessed online 1/18/06 at http://www.scied.science.doe.gov/scied/LSTPD/about.htm.

DOE and NRC. 1998. Serving Science and Society in the New Millennium. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

DOE-EERE (U.S. Department of Energy-Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy). 2005a. Biomass program. Accessed online 11/23/05 at www.eere.energy.gov/biomass.

DOE-EERE. 2005b. Hydrogen fuel cells, and infrastructure technologies program. Accessed online 11/23/05 at www.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/.

DOE-ORNL (Oak Ridge National Laboratory). 2002. The DOE consortium on enhancing carbon sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems. Accessed online 12/1/05 at http://csite.esd.ornl.gov/.


EEA (European Environment Agency). 2004. Impacts of Europe’s changing climate. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.


Fleischmann, R.D., M.D. Adams, O. White, R.A. Clayton, E.F. Kirkness, A.R. Kerlavage, C.J. Bult, J.-F. Tomb, B.A. Dougherty, J.M. Merrick, K. McKenney, G. Sutton, W. FitzHugh, C. Fields, J.D. Gocyne, J. Scott, R. Shirley, L.-I. Liu, A. Glodek, J.M. Kelley, J.F. Weidman, C.A. Phillips, T. Spriggs, E. Hedblom, M.D. Cotton, T.R. Utterback, M.C. Hanna, D.T. Nguyen, D.M. Saudek, R.C. Brandon, L.D. Fine, J.L. Fritchman, J.L. Fuhrmann, N.S.M. Geoghagen, C.L. Gnehm, L.A. McDonald, K.V. Small, C.M. Fraser, H.O. Smith, and J.C. Venter. 1995. Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus Influenzae Rd. Science 269(5223):496-498.

Fraser, A.G. and E.M. Marcotte. 2004. A probabilistic view of gene function. Nature Genetics 36(6):559-564.


Galas, D. 2001. Sequence interpretation: making sense of the sequence. Science 291(5507):1257-1260.

Galbraith, E.A., D.A. Antonopoulos, and B.A. White. 2004. Suppressive subtractive hybridization as a tool for identifying genetic diversity in an environmental metagenome: the rumen as a model. Environmental Microbiology 6(9):928-937.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Department of Energy's Genomics: GTL Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11581.
×

Gans, J., M. Wolinsky, and J. Dunbar. 2005. Computational improvements reveal great bacterial diversity and high metal toxicity in soil. Science 309:1387-1390.

Gates Foundation. 2005. New prospects in the fight against malaria. Accessed online 11/16/05 at http://www.gatesfoundation.org/GlobalHealth/Pri_Diseases/Malaria/Related+Info/MalariaControl.htm.

Gerlt, J.A. and P.C. Babbitt. 2000. Can sequence determine function? Genome Biology 1(5):reviews0005.1-0005.10.

Gibson, G. and S.V. Muse. 2002. A Primer of Genome Science. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

Goffeau, A., B.G. Barrell, H. Bussey, R.W. Davis, B. Dujon, H. Feldmann, F. Galibert, J.D. Hoheisel, C. Jacq, M. Johnston, E.J. Louis, H.W. Mewes, Y. Murakami, P. Philippsen, H. Tettelin, and S.G. Oliver. 1996. Life with 6000 genes. Science 274(5287):546-567.


Hallenbbeck, P.C. 2005. Fundamentals of the fermentative production of hydrogen. Water Science & Technology 52:21-29.

Handelsman, J. 2005a. Metagenomics or megagenomics. Nature Reviews Microbiology 3(6): 457-458.

Handelsman, J. 2005b. How to find new antibiotics. The Scientist 19:20.

Heidelberg, J.F., I.T. Paulsen, K.E. Nelson, E.J. Gaidos, W.C. Nelson, T.D. Read, J.A. Eisen, R. Seshadri, N. Ward, B. Methe, R.A. Clayton, T. Meyer, A. Tsapin, J. Scott, M. Beanan, L. Brinkac, S. Daugherty, R.T. DeBoy, R.J. Dodson, A.S. Durkin, D.H. Haft, J.F. Kolonay, R. Madupu, J.D. Peterson, L.A. Umayam, O. White, A.M. Wolf, J. Vamathevan, J. Weidman, M. Impraim, K. Lee, K. Berry, C. Lee, J. Mueller, H. Khouri, J. Gill, T.R. Utterback, L.A. McDonald, T.V. Feldblyum, H.O. Smith, J.C. Venter, K.H. Nealson, and C.M. Fraser. 2002. Genome sequence of the dissimilatory metal ion-reducing bacterium Shewanella oneidensis. Nature Biotechnology 20:1118-1123.

Heidelberg, J.F., R. Seshadri, S.A. Haveman, C.L. Hemme, I.T. Paulsen, J.F. Kolonay, J.A. Eisen, N. Ward, B. Methé, L.M. Brinkac, S.C. Daugherty, R.T. Deboy, R.J. Dodson, A.S. Durkin, R. Madupu, W.C. Nelson, S.A. Sullivan, D. Fouts, D.H. Haft, J. Selengut, J.D. Peterson, T.M. Davidsen, N. Zafar, L. Zhou, D. Radune, G. Dimitrov, M. Hance, K. Tran, H. Khouri, J. Gill, T.R. Utterback, T.V. Feldblyum, J.D. Wall, G. Voordouw, and C.M. Fraser. 2004. The genome sequence of the anaerobic, sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough. Nature Biotechnology 22(5):554-559.

Hughes, J.B., K. Dustin, and C.H. Ward. 2002. Bioremediation. Published electronically by the Ground-Water Remediation Analysis Center, September, 2002.


Ideker, T., T. Galistski, and L. Hood. 2001. A new approach to decoding life: Systems biology. Annual Review in Genomics and Human Genetics 2:343-372.

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 1997. Stabilization of Atmospheric Greenhouse Gases: Physical, Biological and Socioeconomic Implications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

IPCC. 2001. Climate change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.


Lan, N., G.T. Montelione, and M. Gerstein. 2003. Ontologies for proteomics: towards a systematic definition of structure and function that scales to the genome level. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 7(1):44-54.

Loucks-Horsley, S., N. Love, K.E. Stiles, S. Mundy, and P.W. Hewson. 1998. Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. Corwin Press, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Department of Energy's Genomics: GTL Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11581.
×

Methé, B.A., K.E. Nelson, J.A. Eisen, I.T. Paulsen, W. Nelson, J.F. Heidelberg, D. Wu, M. Wu, N. Ward, M.J. Beanan, R.J. Dodson, R. Madupu, L.M. Brinkac, S.C. Daugherty, R.T. DeBoy, A.S. Durkin, M. Gwinn, J.F. Kolonay, S.A. Sullivan, D.H. Haft, J. Selengut, T.M. Davidsen, N. Zafar, O. White, B. Tran, C. Romero, H.A Forberger, J. Weidman, H. Khouri, T.V. Feldblyum, T.R. Utterback, S.E. Van Aken, D.R. Lovley, and C.M. Fraser. 2003. Genome of Geobacter sulfurreducens: Metal reduction in subsurface environments. Science 302:1967-1969.

MIT Synthetic Biology Working Group. 2005. Synthetic biology frequently asked questions. Accessed online 11/24/05 at http://openwetware.org/wiki/Synthetic_Biology:FAQ.

Mount, D.W. and R. Pandey. 2005. Using bioinformatics and genome analysis for new therapeutic interventions. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 4:1636-1643.


Nath, K. and D. Das. 2004. Improvement of fermentative hydrogen production: various approaches. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 65:520-529.

Neuhauser, C., D.A. Andow, G. Heimpel, G. May, R. Shaw, and S. Wagenius. 2003. Community genetics—a synthesis of community ecology and population genetics. Ecology 84:545-558.

NIH (National Institutes of Health). 2005. Graduate Partnerships Program. Linking NIH Laboratories to Universities in the Training of Graduate Students. Accessed online 12/7/05 at http://gpp.nih.gov.

Ning, L., G.T. Montelione, and M. Gerstein. 2003. Ontologies for proteomics Towards a systematic definition of structure and function that scales to the genome level. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 7:44-54.

NML (U.S. National Medical Library). 2006. Genetics Home Reference: Your Guide to Understanding Genetic Conditions. Accessed online 2/1/06 at http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/ghr/glossary/openreadingframe.

NRC (National Research Council). 1992. Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Base. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

NRC. 1995. Allocating Federal Funds for Science and Technology. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

NRC. 2000. Biobased Industrial Products: Priorities for Research and Commercialization. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

NRC. 2003a. The Carbon Dioxide Dilemma: Promising Technologies and Policies. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

NRC. 2003b. Frontiers in Polar Biology in the Genomic Era. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

NRC. 2004. Biological Confinement of Genetically Engineered Organisms. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

NRC. 2005. Mathematics and 21st Century Biology. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council). 2004. Growing Energy. How Biofuels Could Help End America’s Dependence on Oil. The Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington, DC.

NSF (National Science Foundation). 2005. Microbial Genome Sequencing Program FY 2006. Program Solicitation. Accessed online 12/12/05 at http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2006/nsf06513/nsf06513.htm.

Nuismer, S.L. and M. Kirpatrick. 2003. Gene flow and the coevolution of parasite range. Evolution 57:746-754.

Nuutila M.A., A. Ritala, R.W. Skadsen, L. Mannonen, and V. Kauppinen. 1999. Expression of fungal thermotolerant endo-1, 4--glucanase in transgenic barley seeds during germination. Plant Molecular Biology 41:777-783.


Perlack, R.D., L. Wright, A.F. Turhollow, R.L. Graham, B.J. Stokes, and D.C. Erbac. 2005. Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. DOE/GO-102005-2135.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Department of Energy's Genomics: GTL Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11581.
×

Pizza, M., V. Scarlato, V. Masignani, M.M. Giuliani, B. Arico, M. Comanducci, G.T. Jennings, L. Baldi, E. Bartolini, B. Capecchi, C.L. Galeotti, E. Luzzi, R. Manetti, E. Marchetti, M. Mora, S. Nuti, G. Ratti, L. Santini, S. Savino, M. Scarselli, E. Storni, P. Zuo, M. Broeker, E. Hundt, B. Knapp, E. Blair, T. Mason, H. Tettelin, D.W. Hood, A.C. Jeffries, N.J. Saunders, D.M. Granoff, J.C. Venter, E.R. Moxon, G. Grandi, and R. Rappuoli. 2000. Identification of vaccine candidates against serogroup B meningococcus by whole-genome sequencing. Science 287:1767-1768.


Roberts, L. 2001. The human genome. Controversial from the start. Science 291:1182-1188.

Rosenberg, N.J., F.B. Metting, and R.C. Izaurralde (Editors). 2004. Applications of Biotechnology to Mitigation of Greenhouse Warming. Proceedings of the St. Michaels II Workshop, April 2003. Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio.


Sanford, K. 2004. Bioprocessing: Pathway engineering through rational design. Daily Biotech Updates. Volume 24, January 15, 2004. Accessed online 11/17/05 at http://www.genencor.com/pdf/pathway_011504.pdf.

Securing America’s Future Energy (SAFE) and the National Commission on Energy Policy (NCEP). 2005. Oil shockwave: Oil crisis executive simulation. Accessed on December 13, 2005 at http://www.secureenergy.org/reports/oil_shock_report_master.pdf.


Tringe, S.G. and E.M. Rubin. 2005. Metagenomics: DNA sequencing of environmental samples. Nature Reviews Genetics 6(11):805-814.

Tringe, S.G., C. von Mering, A. Kobayashi, A.A. Salamov, K. Chen, H.W. Chang, M. Podar, J.M. Short, E.J. Mathur, J.C. Detter, P. Bork, P. Hugenholtz, and E.M. Rubin. 2005. Comparative metagenomics of microbial communities. Science 308(5721):554-557.

Trotter, E.W., C.M. Kao, L. Berenfeld, D. Botstein, G.A. Petsko, and J.V. Gray. 2002. Misfolded proteins are competent to mediate a subset of the responses to heat shock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 277(47):44817-44825.

Turelli, M. and N.H. Barton. 1990. Dynamics of polygenic characters under selection. Theoretical Population Biology 38:1-57.


Ugaz, V.M., R. Lin, N. Srivastava, D.T. Burke, and N.A. Burns. 2003. A versatile microfabricated platform for electrophoresis of double- and single-stranded DNA. Electrophoresis 24:151-157.


Venter, J.C., K. Remington, J.F. Heidelberg, A.L. Halpern, D. Rusch, J.A. Eisen, D. Wu, I. Paulsen, K.E. Nelson, W. Nelson, D.E. Fouts, S. Levy, A.H. Knap, M.W. Lomas, K. Nealson, O. White, J. Peterson, J. Hoffman, R. Parsons, H. Baden-Tillson, C. Pfannkoch, Y.H. Rogers, and H.O. Smith. 2004. Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science 304(5667):66-74.

Vogel, V. and B. Baird. 2005. Nanobiotechnology: Report of the National Nanotechnology Initiative Workshop, October 9-11, 2003, Arlington, VA. National Science and Technology Council.


Williams, R.J. and N.D. Martinez. 2004. Stabilization of chaotic and non-permanent food-web dynamics. The European Physical Journal B 38:297-303.

Williamson, L.L., B.R. Borlee, P.D. Schloss, C. Guan, H.K. Allen, and J. Handelsman. 2005. Intracellular screen to identify metagenomic clones that induce or inhibit a quorum-sensing biosensor. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71:6335-6344.

Wilson, M.A., D. Ringe, and G.A. Petsko. 2005. The atomic resolution crystal structure of the YajL (ThiJ) protein from Escherichia coli: a close prokaryotic homologue of the Parkinsonism-associated protein DJ-1. Journal of Molecular Biology 353:678-691.


Yuan, Y., P.J. SanMiguel, and J.L. Bennetzen. 2003. High-Cot sequence analysis of the maize genome. The Plant Journal: for cell and molecular biology 34(2):249-255.


Zang, J., R.E. Campbell, A.Y. Ting, and R.Y. Tsien. 2003. Creating new fluorescent probes for cell biology. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 3:906-918.

Ziegelhoffer T., J.A. Raasch, and S. Austin-Phillips. 2001. Dramatic effects of truncation and sub-cellular targeting on the accumulation of recombinant microbial cellulase in tobacco. Molecular Breeding 8:147-158.

Ziegler, M., S. Thomas, and K. Danna. 2000. Accumulation of a thermostable endo-1,4 -D-glucanase in the apoplast of Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. Molecular Breeding 6:37-46.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Department of Energy's Genomics: GTL Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11581.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Department of Energy's Genomics: GTL Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11581.
×
Page 69
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Department of Energy's Genomics: GTL Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11581.
×
Page 70
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Department of Energy's Genomics: GTL Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11581.
×
Page 71
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Department of Energy's Genomics: GTL Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11581.
×
Page 72
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Department of Energy's Genomics: GTL Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11581.
×
Page 73
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Department of Energy's Genomics: GTL Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11581.
×
Page 74
Next: Appendix A Committee Biographies »
Review of the Department of Energy's Genomics: GTL Program Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $38.00 Buy Ebook | $30.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) promotes scientific and technological innovation to advance the national, economic, and energy security of the United States. Recognizing the potential of microorganisms to offer new energy alternatives and remediate environmental contamination, DOE initiated the Genomes to Life program, now called Genomics: GTL, in 2000. The program aims to develop a predictive understanding of microbial systems that can be used to engineer systems for bioenergy production and environmental remediation, and to understand carbon cycling and sequestration. This report provides an evaluation of the program and its infrastructure plan. Overall, the report finds that GTL’s research has resulted in and promises to deliver many more scientific advancements that contribute to the achievement of DOE’s goals. However, the DOE’s current plan for building four independent facilities for protein production, molecular imaging, proteome analysis, and systems biology sequentially may not be the most cost-effective, efficient, and scientifically optimal way to provide this infrastructure. As an alternative, the report suggests constructing up to four institute-like facilities, each of which integrates the capabilities of all four of the originally planned facility types and focuses on one or two of DOE’s mission goals. The alternative infrastructure plan could have an especially high ratio of scientific benefit to cost because the need for technology will be directly tied to the biology goals of the program.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!