National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 7 Communication and Outreach
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2006. Review of Recreational Fisheries Survey Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11616.
×
Page 133
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2006. Review of Recreational Fisheries Survey Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11616.
×
Page 134
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2006. Review of Recreational Fisheries Survey Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11616.
×
Page 135
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2006. Review of Recreational Fisheries Survey Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11616.
×
Page 136
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2006. Review of Recreational Fisheries Survey Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11616.
×
Page 137
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2006. Review of Recreational Fisheries Survey Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11616.
×
Page 138
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2006. Review of Recreational Fisheries Survey Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11616.
×
Page 139
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2006. Review of Recreational Fisheries Survey Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11616.
×
Page 140
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2006. Review of Recreational Fisheries Survey Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11616.
×
Page 141
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2006. Review of Recreational Fisheries Survey Methods. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11616.
×
Page 142

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

References Äas, O., W. Haider, and L. Hunt. 2000. Angler responses to harvest regulations in Engerdal, Norway: A conjoint based choice modeling approach. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 20:940-950. American Statistical Association. 2006a. ASA Committees. [Online]. Available: http://www.amstat.org/comm/index.cfm?fuseaction=main [2006, February 9]. American Statistical Association. 2006b. Research Fellowship Programs. [Online]. Available: http://www.amstat.org/research_grants/index.cfm? fuseaction=main [2006, February 9]. Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission. 2003. Fishery Management Report No. 41 of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission: Amendment 6 to the Interstate Fishery Management Plan for Atlantic Striped Bass February 2003. Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, Washington, DC. Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission. 2004. 2004 Stock Assessment Report for Atlantic Striped Bass: Catch-at-Age Based VPA and Tag Release/Recovery Based Survival Estimation. Prepared by the Striped Bass Technical Committee for the Atlantic Striped Bass Management Board, Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, Washington, DC. Ault, J.S., S.G. Smith, D.A. Guillermo, and E. Franklin. 2003. Florida Hogfish Fishery Stock Assessment. [Online]. Available: http://bonefish.rsmas.miami. edu/femar/Publications/hogfish_stock_assessment_2003.pdf [2006, Febru- ary 7]. Battese, G.E., R.M. Harter, and W.A. Fuller. 1988. An error-components model for prediction of county crop areas using survey and satellite data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 83:28-36. Bohnsack B.L., R.B. Ditton, J.R. Stoll, R.J. Chen, R. Novak, and L.S. Smutko. 2002. The economic impacts of the recreational bluefin tuna fishery in Hatteras, North Carolina. North American Journal of Fisheries Manage- ment 22:165-176. Breidt, F.J. 2002. National Resources Inventory (NRI), US. In: Encyclopedia of Environmetrics (vol. 3), El-Shaarawi, A.H. and W.W. Piegorsch (eds.). John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ. 133

134 REVIEW OF RECREATIONAL FISHERIES SURVEY METHODS Breidt, F.J. and W.A. Fuller. 1999. Design of supplemented panel surveys with application to the National Resources Inventory. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 4:391-403. Breidt, F.J. and J.D. Opsomer. 2000. Local polynomial regression estimators in survey sampling. Annals of Statistics 28:1026-1053. Brockwell, P.J. and R.A. Davis. 1991. Time Series: Theory and Methods (2nd ed.). Springer-Verlag, New York, NY. Cameron, T.A. and D.D. Huppert. 1989. OLS versus ML estimation of non- market resource values with payment card interval data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 17(3):230-246. Cantwell, P.J. 1990. Variance formulas for composite estimation in rotation designs. Survey Methodology 16:153-163. Chhikara, R.S. and L.Y. Deng. 1992. Estimation using multiyear rotation design sampling in agricultural surveys. Journal of the American Statistical Associ- ation 87:924-932. Cochran, W.G. 1977. Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ. Coleman, F.C., W.F. Figueira, J.S. Ueland, and L.B. Crowder. 2004. The impact of United States recreational fisheries on marine fish populations. Science 305:1958-1959. Colorado State University. 2005. STARMAP Program. [Online]. Available: http://www.stat.colostate.edu/%7Ensu/starmap/program.html [2006, Febru- ary 9]. Connelly, N.A. and T.B. Brown. 1995. Use of angler diaries to examine biases associated with 12-month recall on mail questionnaires. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 124:413-442. Cooke, S.J. and I.G. Cowx. 2004. The role of recreational fishing in global fish crises. Bioscience 54(9):857-859. Coughenower, D. and C. Blood. 1997. Flat Out Facts about Halibut. Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska, Fairbanks. Cressie, N.A.C. 1993. Statistics for Spatial Data (revised ed.). John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ. Dauk, P.C. and C.J. Schwarz. 2001. Catch estimation using complex surveys with no randomization in the effort survey. Biometrics 57:461-468. Dietzenbacher, E. and M.L. Lahr (eds.). 2004. Wassily Leontief and Input- Output Economics. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. Diewert, R.E., D.A. Nagtegaal, and K. Hein. 2005. A comparison of the results of the 1998 Georgia Strait creel survey with an independent observer program. Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences No. 2716. University of New Brunswick. Dillman, D.A. 2000. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2nd ed.). John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ. Ditton, R.B., A. Loftus, and J.H. Volstad. 2002. Review Findings of the ACCSP For-Hire Pilot Survey. Report to the Atlantic Coastal Cooperative Statistics Program, Washington, DC.

REFERENCES 135 Diodati, P.J. and R.A. Richards. 1996. Mortality of striped bass hooked and released in salt water. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 125:300-307. Essig, R.J. and M.C. Holliday. 1991. Development of a recreational fishing survey: The marine recreational fishery statistics survey case study. American Fisheries Society Symposium 12:162-176. Federal Register. 2002. Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and south Atlantic; coastal migratory pelagic resources of the Gulf of Mexico and south Atlantic; reef fish resources of the Gulf of Mexico; charter vessel and headboat permit moratorium. Federal Register 67(39):8926-8927. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2005. Recreational Saltwater Fishing License(s) Requirements. [Online]. Available: http:// www.marinefisheries.org/license.htm#rec [2006, March 21]. Foster, D.G. 2004. 1999-2003 North-Central and Western Gulf of Mexico BRD Performance. Report to the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Pascagoula, MS. Gautam, A. and S.R. Steinback. 1998. Valuation of recreational fisheries in the northeast U.S. striped bass: A case study. In Recreational Fisheries: Social, Economic, and Management Aspects, Hickley, P. and H. Tompkins (eds.). Fishing News Books, Oxford, England. Ghosh, M. and J.N.K. Rao. 1994. Small area estimation: An appraisal. Statistical Science 9:55-93. Goodyear, C.P. 1997. Fish age determination from length: An evaluation of three methods using simulated data. Fisheries Bulletin 95:39-46. Green, L.M., H.R. Osburn, G.C. Matlock, and R.B. Ditton. 1991. Development of a social and economic questionnaire for on-site interviews of marine recreational anglers in Texas. American Fisheries Society Symposium 12:406-412. Groves, R.M., F.J. Fowler, M.P. Couper, J.M. Lepkowski, E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau. 2004. Survey Methodology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hobo- ken, NJ. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council. 2003. Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Generic Essential Fish Habitat Amendment to the Following Fishery Management Plans of the Gulf of Mexico: Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico, Red Drum Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico, Reef Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico, Stone Crab Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico, Coral and Coral Reef Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico, Spiny Lobster Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic, and Coastal Migratory Pelagic Resources of the Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, Tampa, FL. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council. 2004a. Final Amendment 22 to the Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan to Set Red Snapper Sustainable Fisheries Act Targets and Thresholds, Set a Rebuilding Plan, and Establish Bycatch Reporting Methodologies for the Reef Fish Fishery. [Online].

136 REVIEW OF RECREATIONAL FISHERIES SURVEY METHODS Available: http://www.gulfcouncil.org/downloads/Amend%2022%20Final %2070204.pdf [2006, February 7]. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council. 2004b. SEDAR 7: Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper--Red Snapper Data Workshop Report. [Online]. Available: http://www.gulfcouncil.org/downloads/SEDAR%207%20DW_FINALREP ORT_RS.pdf [2006, February 7]. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council. 2005a. SEDAR 7: Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review--Stock Assessment Report of SEDAR 7 Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper. [Online]. Available: http://www.gulfcouncil.org/ downloads/SEDAR7%20AW%20report%20main.pdf [2006, February 7]. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council. 2005b. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council Report to the National Research Council on the Recreational Fishing Survey Methods July 2005. [Online]. Available: http://www.gulfcouncil.org/downloads/NRC-Recreational-Letter.pdf [2006, February 7]. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council. 2005c. Public Hearing Draft Amendment to the FMPs for Reef Fish (Amendment 25) and Coastal Migratory Pelagics (Amendment 17) for Extending the Charter Vessel/Head Boat Moratorium, Including SEIS/RIR/IRFA. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, Tampa, FL. Gulland, J.A. 1983. Fish Stock Assessment: A Manual of Basic Methods (vol. 1). Series on Food and Agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization/John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Guthrie, D., J.M. Hoenig, M. Holliday, C.M. Jones, M.J. Mills, S.A. Moberley, K.H. Pollock, and D.R. Talhelm (eds.). 1991. Creel and angler surveys in fisheries management. American Fisheries Society Symposium 12. Ameri- can Fisheries Society. Haab, T.C., J.C. Whitehead, and K.E. McConnell. 2001. The Economic Value of Marine Recreational Fishing in the Southeast United States. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Hardie, D.C., D.A. Naagtegaal, and L. Nagy. 1998. Strait of Georgia sport fishery creel survey statistics for salmon and ground fish. Canadian Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Report. University of New Brunswick. Hartley, H.O. 1962. Multiple frame surveys. Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association. American Statistical Association, Washington, DC. Henry, G.W. 2002. The national recreational and indigenous fishing survey. Proceedings of the Third World Recreational Fishing Conference. May 21- 24, 2002, Darwin, Australia. Hicks, R.L. 2002. Stated Preference Methods for Environmental Management: Recreational Summer Flounder Angling in the Northeastern United States. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MD. Holiman, S.G. 1996. Estimating Recreational Effort Using the Marine Recre- ational Fisheries Statistics Survey Data. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Technical Memorandum.

REFERENCES 137 Holland, S.M. and R.B. Ditton. 1992. Fishing trip satisfaction: A typology of anglers. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 12:28-33. Huppert, D.D. 1989. Measuring the value of fish to anglers: Application to central California anadromous species. Marine Resource Economics 6(2):89-108. Jagielo, T.H., F.R. Wallace, and Y.W. Cheng. 2003. Assessment of Lingcod (Opiodon elongates) for the Pacific Fishery Management Council in 2003. [Online]. Available: http://www.pcouncil.org/groundfish/gfsafe0604/ lingcod.pdf [2006, February 7]. Jentoft, S., B.J. McCay, and D.C. Wilson. 1998. Social theory and fisheries co- management. Marine Policy 22:423-436. Johnston, R.S. 1992. Fisheries Development, Fisheries Management, and Externalities. World Bank Discussion Paper No. 165. The World Bank, Washington, DC. King, J.R. and D.R. Haggarty. 2004. An examination of recapture rates of lingcod as a potential source of bias in recreational catch per unit effort (CPUE) indices. Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences No. 2670. University of New Brunswick. King, P. 1999. Practitioners' profile: The fishermen and scientists research society. Common Property Resource Digest 49:9-11. Kohler, N.E., J.G. Casey, and P.A. Turner. 1998. NMFS Cooperative Shark Tagging Program, 1962-1993: An atlas of shark tag and recapture data. Marine Fisheries Review 60(2):1-87. Layton, D.F., G.M. Brown, Jr., and M.L. Plummer. 1999. Valuing Multiple Programs to Improve Fish Populations. Unpublished document. Depart- ment of Ecology, Washington State University, Pullman. Lee, L.M. 2003. Population Assessment and Short-Term Stock Projections of the Bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix). Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Com- mission, Washington, DC. Legault, C.M. and V.R. Restrepo. 1998. A flexible forward age-structured assessment program. International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas Collective Volume of Scientific Papers 49:246-253. Lepkowski, J.M. and M.P. Couper. 2002. Nonresponse in the second wave of longitudinal household surveys. In Survey Nonresponse, Groves, R., D. Dillman, J. Eltinge, and R. Little (eds.). John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ. Lockwood, R.N., J. Peck, and J. Oelfke. 2001. Survey of angling in Lake Superior waters at Isle Royale National Park, 1998. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21:471-481. Loftus, A.J., G.C. Radonski, and R.B. Stone. 1999. Interactive Outreach with the Atlantic Coast Recreational Fishing Community for the ACCSP. Final report to the Atlantic Coastal Cooperative Statistics Program, Washington, DC. Lohr, S.L. 1999. Sampling Design and Analysis. Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA.

138 REVIEW OF RECREATIONAL FISHERIES SURVEY METHODS Louviere, J.J., D. Hensher, and J. Swait. 2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge University Press, London, England. Lucy, J. and A.L. Studholme (eds.). 2002. Catch and release in marine recreational fisheries. American Fisheries Society Symposium 30. American Fisheries Society. Lyle, J.M., A.P.M. Coleman, L. West, D. Campbell, and G.W. Henry. 2002. An innovative methodology for the collection of detailed and reliable data in large-scale Australian recreational fishing surveys. In Recreational Fisheries: Ecological, Economic, and Social Evaluation, Pitcher, T.J. and C.E. Hollingworth (eds.). Fish and Aquatic Resources Series No 8. Blackwell Science, Oxford, England. Malvestuto, S.P. 1983. Sampling the recreational fishery. In Fisheries Techniques, Nielsen, L.A. and D.L. Johnson (eds.). American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD. McConnell, K.E., I.E. Strand, S. Valdes, and Q.R. Weninger. 1994. Volume 2: The Economic Value of Mid and South Atlantic Sportfishing. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. McFadden, D. 2001. Economic choices. The American Economic Review 91(3):351-378. Mitchell, R.C. and R.T. Carson. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC. Munger, L., G. Shepard, and W. Laney. 2005. 2005 Review of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission's Fishery Management Plan for Atlantic Striped Bass (Morone saxatilis). Prepared by the Striped Bass Plan Review Team, Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, Washington, DC. National Center for Education Statistics. 2006. NAEP Data Explorer. [Online]. Available: http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/nde/ [2006, February 21]. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2000a. Other Surveys. [Online]. Available: http://www.st.nmfs.gov/st1/econ/survey_o.html [2006, April 24]. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2000b. RecFish 2000: Managing Marine Recreational Fisheries in the 21st Century--Meeting the Needs of Managers, Anglers, and Industry. [Online]. Available: http:// www.nmfs.noaa.gov/irf/RecFish2000.pdf [2006, February 9]. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2005a. Fisheries of the United States: 2004. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MD. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2005b. NOAA Recreational Fisheries Statistics Program. [Online]. Available: http://www.st.nmfs.gov/ st1/recreational/index.html [2006, February 7]. National Research Council. 1999. Sustaining Marine Fisheries. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

REFERENCES 139 National Research Council. 2000. Improving the Collection, Management, and Use of Marine Fisheries Data. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. National Research Council. 2002. Science and Its Role in the National Marine Fisheries Service. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. National Research Council. 2004. Improving the Use of the "Best Scientific Information Available" Standard in Fisheries Management. National Academies Press, Washington, DC. National Science Foundation. 2005. Methodology, Measurement, and Statistics (MMS). [Online]. Available: http://nsf.gov/pubs/2004/nsf04504/ nsf04504.pdf [2006, February 9]. Neis, B., L. Felt, D.C. Schneider, R. Haedrich, J. Hutchings, and J. Fischer. 1996. Northern Cod Stock Assessments: What Can Be Learned From Interviewing Resource Users? DFO Atlantic Fisheries Research Document 96/45, Fisheries and Oceans, Canada. Nieuwenbroek, N.J. 1991. Precision of net change in a rotating panel survey. The Statistician 40:195-201. Northeast Fisheries Science Center. 2003. Report of the 36th Northeast Regional Stock Assessment Workshop (36th SAW): Stock Assessment Review Committee (SARC) Consensus Summary of Assessments. Northeast Fisheries Science Center Reference Document 03-06, National Marine Fisheries Service, Woods Hole, MA. Nusser, S.M. and J.J. Goebel. 1997. The National Resources Inventory: A long- term multi-resource monitoring program. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 4:181-204. Oh, C.O., R.B. Ditton, B. Genter, and R. Riechers. 2005. A stated preference choice approach to understanding angler preferences for management options. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 10(3):173-186. Oregon State University. 2005. DAMARS. [Online]. Available: http:// oregonstate.edu/dept/statistics/epa_program/index.html [2006, February 9]. Pacific Fishery Management Council. 2003. Lingcod: STAR Panel Meeting Report. [Online]. Available: http://www.pcouncil.org/groundfish/ gfsafe0604/lingcodstar.pdf [2006, March 24]. Pacific Fishery Management Council. 2004. Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan for the California, Oregon, and Washington Groundfish Fishery as Amended through Amendment 17. [Online]. Available: http://www.pcouncil.org/groundfish/gffmp/fmpthru17.pdf [2006, February 7]. Pacific Fishery Management Council. 2006. 2005 Stock Assessments and STAR Panel Reports. [Online]. Available: http://www.pcouncil.org/groundfish/ 05gfstokasmts.html [2006, February 7]. Parrack, N.C. 1986a. A Review of Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper Age and Growth. National Marine Fisheries Service. Parrack, N.C. 1986b. Review and Update of Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper Biometrics. National Marine Fisheries Service.

140 REVIEW OF RECREATIONAL FISHERIES SURVEY METHODS Parrack, N.C. and D.B. McClellan. 1986. Trends in Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper Population Dynamics, 1979­85. National Marine Fisheries Service. Parsons, G.R. 2003. The travel cost model. In A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, Champ, P.A., K.J. Boyle, and T.C. Brown (eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA. Pauly, D. 1998. Rationale for reconstructing catch time series. European Commission Fisheries Cooperation Bulletin 11(2):4-7. Pederson, J. and M. Hall-Arber. 1999. Fish habitat: A focus on New England fishermen's perspectives. American Fisheries Society Symposium 22:188- 211. Policansky, D. 2002. Catch-and-release recreational fishing: A historical perspective. In Recreational Fisheries: Ecological, Economic, and Social Evaluation, Pitcher, T.J. and C. Hollingworth (eds.). Blackwell Science, Oxford. Pollock, K.H. 2002. Recreational angler surveys: The interaction of scale and optimal contact methods for effort and catch estimation. Proceedings of the Third World Recreational Fishing Conference. May 21-24, 2002, Darwin, Australia. Pollock, K.H., C.M. Jones, and T.L. Brown. 1994. Angler Survey Methods and their Applications in Fisheries Management. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 25, Bethesda, MD. Porch, C.E. 2004a. An Alternative Assessment of the Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) Fishery in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico Using a Spatially-Explicit Age-Structured Assessment Model: Preliminary Results. Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Miami, FL. Porch, C.E. 2004b. An Age-Structured Assessment Model for Red Snapper that Allows for Multiple Stocks, Fleets, and Habitats. Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Miami, FL. Ralston, S. and E.J. Dick. 2003. The Status of Black Rockfish (Sebastes melanops) off Oregon and Northern California in 2003. [Online]. Available: http://www.pcouncil.org/groundfish/gfsafe0803/black.pdf [2006, February 7]. Rao, J.N.K. 2003. Small Area Estimation. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ. Richards, L.J., J.T. Schnute, and C.M. Hand. 1990. A multivariate maturity model with a comparative analysis of three lingcod (Ophiodon elongatus) stocks. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47:948-959. Robins, C.R., G.C. Rey, and J. Douglass. 1986. A Field Guide to Atlantic Coast Fishes. Houghton Mifflin Co., New York, NY. Robson, D.S. 1960. An unbiased sampling and estimation procedures for creel censuses of fishermen. Biometrics 16:261-277. Robson, D.S. 1961. On the statistical theory of a roving creel census. Biometrics 17:415-437. Robson, D.S. and C.M. Jones. 1989. The theoretical basis of an access site angler survey design. Biometrics 45:83-98.

REFERENCES 141 Rogers, E.M. 2003. The Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). The Free Press, New York, NY. Särndal, C.E., B. Swensson, and J. Wretman. 1992. Model Assisted Survey Sampling. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY. Schirripa, M.J. 1999. Management trade-offs between the directed and undirected fisheries of red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Proceedings of the International Conference on Integrated Fisheries Monitoring. Sydney, Australia, 1-5 February 1999. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy. Schirripa, M.J. and C.M. Legault. 1999. Status of the Red Snapper in U.S. Waters of the Gulf of Mexico: Updated through 1998. [Online]. Available: http://www.gulfcouncil.org/downloads/RSAssess99.pdf [2006, February 7]. Southeast Fisheries Science Center. 2002. Status of Red Grouper in United States Waters of the Gulf of Mexico During 1986­2001. [Online]. Available; http://www.gulfcouncil.org/Beta/GMFMCWeb/downloads/Gulf- RedGrouper-Assessment-1986to2001-revised12132002.pdf [2006, May 1]. Steinback, S.R. 1999. Regional economic impact assessments of recreational fisheries: An application of the IMPLAN modeling system to marine party and charter boat fishing in Maine. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19:724-736. Stephens, A. and A. MacCall. 2004. A multispecies approach to subsetting logbook data for purposes of estimating CPUE. Fisheries Research 70:299- 310. Sutton, T. 1999. Local Knowledge of a Unique Population of Atlantic Salmon: Implications for Community-Based Management of Recreational Fisheries in Newfoundland and Labrador. Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. Tiller, R. 1992. Time series modeling of sample survey data from the U.S. Current Population Survey. Journal of Official Statistics 8:149-66. University of Washington. 2004. Coleraine: A Generalized Age Structured Stock Assessment Model. [Online]. Available: http://fish.washington.edu/ research/coleraine/ [2006, May 26]. U.S. Census Bureau. 2001. Current Population Survey. [Online]. Available: http://www.bls.census.gov/cps/cpsmain.htm [2006, February 7]. U.S. Census Bureau. 2006. U.S. Census Bureau: Fact Finder. [Online]. Available: http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang=en [2006, February 21]. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1999. Summary Report: 1997 National Resources Inventory. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC, and Statistical Laboratory, Iowa State University, Ames. U.S. Department of Justice. 2005. Bureau of Justice Statistics Criminal Vic- timization Data Collections. [Online]. Available: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ bjs/cvict.htm#ncvs [2006, February 7]. Volstad, J.H., K.H. Pollock, and W. Rickus. In press. Some new methodological developments in the design and analysis of aerial-access angler surveys:

142 REVIEW OF RECREATIONAL FISHERIES SURVEY METHODS The Delaware River angler survey 2002. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. Watson, R., S. Guénette, P. Fanning, and T.J. Pitcher. 2000. The basis for change: Part 1--Reconstructing fisheries catch and effort data. In Methods for Evaluating the Impacts of Fisheries on North Atlantic Ecosystems, Pauly, D. and T.J. Pitcher (eds.). Fisheries Centre Research Reports, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. Wilson, C.A. and D.L. Nieland. 2001. Age and growth of red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus, from the northern Gulf of Mexico off Louisiana. Fisheries Bulletin 99:653-664. Wilson, D.C. 1999. Fisheries Science Collaborations: The Critical Role of the Community. Research Publication No. 45. Institute for Fisheries Manage- ment and Coastal Community Development, North Sea Centre, Hirtshals, Denmark. Wilson, D.C., J.R. Nielsen, and P. Degnbol (eds.). 2003. The Fisheries Co- Management Experience: Accomplishments, Challenges, and Prospects. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Wolter, K. 1979. Composite estimation in finite populations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74:604-613. Yandle, T. 2003. The challenge of building successful stakeholder organiza- tions: New Zealand's experience in developing a fisheries co-management regime. Marine Policy 27:179-192.

Next: Appendix A: Committee and Staff Biographies »
Review of Recreational Fisheries Survey Methods Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $61.00 Buy Ebook | $48.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Recreational fishing in the United States is an important social and economic component of many marine fisheries, with an estimated 14 million anglers making almost 82 million fishing trips in 2004. Although each individual angler typically harvests a small number of fish, collectively these sport fisheries can take a significant fraction of the yearly catch—in some cases more than commercial fisheries. For example, in 1999, recreational fishing accounted for 94% of the total catch of spotted sea trout, 76% of striped bass and sheephead, and 60 percent of king mackerel. It is important that systems used to monitor fishing catch are adequate for timely management of recreational fisheries. However, the large number of anglers and access points makes monitoring recreational fishing much more difficult than monitoring commercial fishing. This report reviews the types of survey methods used to estimate catch in recreational fisheries, including state/federal cooperative programs. The report finds that both telephone survey and onsite access components of the current monitoring systems have serious flaws in design or implementation. There are also several areas of miscommunication and mismatched criteria among designers of surveys, data collectors, and recreational fisheries. The report recommends that a comprehensive, universal sampling frame with national coverage should be established, and that improvements should be made in statistical analysis of the data collected and in the ways the data are communicated. A permanent and independent research group should be established and funded to evaluate the statistical design and adequacy of recreational fishery surveys and to guide necessary modifications or new initiatives.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!