National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$54.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Preventing Medication Errors: Quality Chasm Series (2007)
Board on Health Care Services (HCS)

Citation Manager

. "8 Action Agendas for Oversight, Regulation, and Payment ." Preventing Medication Errors: Quality Chasm Series. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
330
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Preventing Medication Errors
  • Use laws, accreditation practices, payment mechanisms, and the media to foster the safety and quality of medication use.

MOTIVATION FOR PROCESS IMPROVEMENT

Process improvement is primarily the responsibility of providers who must redesign processes at the microsystem level (see Chapter 5). There are, however, key roles in process improvement for legislators, regulators, accreditors, payers, and patient safety organizations.

There are two separate but linked pathways to quality improvement using the measurement of health care performance (see Figure 8-1) (Berwick et al., 2003). Pathway 1 uses performance measurement for accountability purposes—allowing patients, accreditors, and regulators to know how well a particular unit is performing—and for selection purposes—helping patients, referring clinicians, and purchasers decide which providers to use for the services they wish to purchase. Pathway 2 uses performance measurement to design and implement new processes for delivering higher-quality care. The two pathways are linked through the motivation for process

FIGURE 8-1 Two pathways to quality improvement.

SOURCE: Berwick et al., 2003.

Page
330