3-5 Elaboration of Big Ideas

6-8 Elaboration of Big Ideas

Although measurements are more reliable than commonsense impressions, measurements can be more or less precise and there is always some measurement error.

Instruments, such as microscopes, can extend our ability to observe and measure.

Our senses respond to combinations of physical properties, rather than isolated ones. For this reason, they are not good measures of those physical properties.

Sources of measurement error can be examined and quantified.

We can learn about the properties of things through indirect measurement (e.g., water displacement) as well as using powerful tools (microscopes).

3AM. Atoms are too small to see directly with commonly available tools.

Graphs, visual models, simple algebraic formulas, or quantitative verbal statements can be used to represent inter-relations among variables and to make predictions about one variable from knowledge of others.

Models can propose unseen entities to explain a pattern of data.

3AM: The properties of and changes in atoms and molecules have to be distinguished from the macroscopic properties and phenomena for which they account.

Hypotheses and data are distinct.

We make stronger arguments for our ideas when they fit a pattern of data rather than simply one observation.

We can clarify our ideas by more precisely stating the conditions under which they are true.

Good arguments involve getting data that help distinguish between competing explanations.

3AM. We learn about properties of atoms and molecules indirectly, using hypothetico-deductive reasoning.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement