and effective public education in order to ensure public understanding and that make widely available clear, easy, non-onerous, and reliable ways for individuals to register their refusal.

Recommendation 7.1 Presumed Consent.

At this time, states should not replace the existing legal framework, which requires explicit consent for organ donation, with a framework under which people are presumed to have consented to donate their organs after death unless they have declared otherwise. However, it would be appropriate for all interested parties to seek to create over time the social and cultural conditions that would be essential for the adoption of an effective and ethical system of presumed consent.

REFERENCES

Abadie A, Gay S. 2004. The Impact of Presumed Consent Legislation on Cadaveric Organ Donation: A Cross Country Study. [Online]. Available: http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~aabadie/pconsent.pdf [accessed March 15, 2006].

AMA (American Medical Association), Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. 1994. Strategies for cadaveric organ procurement: Mandated choice and presumed consent. Journal of the American Medical Association 272(10):809–812.

AMA. 2005. Presumed Consent Organ Donation. Report of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. CEJA Report 7-A-05. [Online]. Available: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/369/ceja_7a05.pdf [accessed March 30, 2006].

Areen J. 1988. A scarcity of organs. Journal of Legal Education 38:555–565.

Ashraf H. 1999. Doctor and patient groups vote for presumed consent. Lancet 354(9174):230.

Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. 2001. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

Cameron S, Forsythe J. 2001. How can we improve organ donation rates? Research into the identification of factors which may influence the variation. Nefrologia 21(Suppl 5): 68–77.

Childress JF. 1997. Practical Reasoning in Bioethics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Dennis JM, Hanson P, Hodge EE, Krom RAF, Veatch RM. 1993. An Evaluation of the Ethics of Presumed Consent and a Proposal Based on Required Response. A Report of the Presumed Consent Subcommittee of the United Network for Organ Sharing Ethics Committee. [Online]. Available: http://www.unos.org/resources/bioethics.asp?index=1 [accessed February 13, 2006].

Eaton S. 1998. The subtle politics of organ donation: A proposal. Journal of Medical Ethics 24(3):166–170.

English V, Sommerville A. 2003. Presumed consent for transplantation: A dead issue after Alder Hay? Journal of Medical Ethics 29(3):147–152.

Erin CA, Harris J. 1999. Presumed consent or contracting out. Journal of Medical Ethics 25(5):365–366.

Gallup Organization. 1983. Attitudes and Opinions of the American Public Towards Kidney Donations. GO 8305. Conducted for the National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Princeton, NJ: The Gallup Organization.

Gallup Organization. 1985. The U.S. Public’s Attitudes Toward Organ Transplants/Organ Donation.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement