The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Organ Donation: Opportunities for Action
GO 84249. Conducted for Golin Harris Communications on behalf of the American Council on Transplantation. Princeton, NJ: The Gallup Organization.
Gallup Organization. 1986. The U.S. Public’s Attitudes Toward Organ Transplants/OrganDonation. GO 86060. Conducted for The Dow Chemical Company, on behalf of the Dow Take Initiative Program. Princeton, NJ: The Gallup Organization.
Gallup Organization. 1987. The U.S. Public’s Attitudes Toward Organ Transplants/OrganDonation. GO 87073. Conducted for The Dow Chemical Company, on behalf of the Dow Take Initiative Program. Princeton, NJ: The Gallup Organization.
Gill MB. 2004. Presumed consent, autonomy, and organ donation. Journal of Medicine andPhilosophy 29(1):37–59.
Gimbel RW, Strosberg MA, Lehrman SE, Gefenas E, Taft F. 2003. Presumed consent and other predictors of cadaveric organ donation in Europe. Progress in Transplantation 13(1):17–23.
Johnson EJ, Goldstein D. 2003. Do defaults save lives? Science 302(5649):1338–1339.
Johnson EJ, Goldstein D. 2004. Defaults and donation decisions. Transplantation 78(12): 1713–1716.
Kennedy I. 1979. The donation and transplantation of kidneys: Should the law be changed? Journal of Medical Ethics 5(1):13–21.
Kennedy I, Sells RA, Daar AS, Guttman RD, Hoffenberg R, Lock M, Radcliffe-Richards J, Tilney N. 1998. The case for “presumed consent” in organ donation. Lancet 351(9116): 1650–1652.
Muyskens JL. 1978. An alternative policy for obtaining cadaver organs for transplantation. Philosophy and Public Affairs 8(1):88–99.
Nadel MS, Nadel CA. 2005. Using reciprocity to motivate organ donations. Yale Journal ofHealth Policy, Law, and Ethics 5(1):293–325.
Nelson JL. 1992. The Rights and Responsibilities of Potential Organ Donors: A Communitarian Approach. Washington, DC: Communitarian Network.
Prottas JM. 1985. Organ procurement in Europe and the United States. Milbank MemorialFund Quarterly/Health and Society 63(1):94–126.
Ramsey P. 1970. The Patient as Person. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Roels L, Vanrenterghem Y, Waer M, Christiaens MR, Gruwez J, Michielsen P. 1991. Three years of experience with a ‘presumed consent’ legislation in Belgium: Its impact on multi-organ donation in comparison with other European countries. TransplantationProceedings 23(1 Pt 2):903–904.
Siegal G, Bonnie R. 2006. Closing the organ donation gap: A reciprocity-based social contract approach. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34(2):415–423.
Simmons AJ. 1976. Tacit consent and political obligation. Philosophy and Public Affairs 5(3):274–291.
Steinberg D. 2004. An “opting in” paradigm for kidney transplantation. American Journal ofBioethics 4(4):4–14.
Task Force on Organ Transplantation. 1986. Organ Transplantation: Issues and Recommendations. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Veatch RM. 2000. Transplantation Ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Veatch RM, Pitt JB. 1995. The myth of presumed consent: Ethical problems in new organ procurement strategies. Transplantation Proceedings 27(2):1888–1892.
Wells JA. 2005 (June 20). National Survey of Organ Donation: 2005 Preliminary Results. Presentation at the Institute of Medicine Workshop on Increasing Rates of Organ Donation, Washington, DC. Institute of Medicine Committee on Increasing Rates of Organ Donation.
Wilks M. 1998. Organ donation and presumed consent. Lancet 352(9122):151.