National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$35.50
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Enhancing Philanthropy's Support of Biomedical Scientists: Proceedings of a Workshop on Evaluation (2006)

Citation Manager

. "The Lucille P. Markey Charitable Trust Scholars Program--Krystyna R. Isaacs." Enhancing Philanthropy's Support of Biomedical Scientists: Proceedings of a Workshop on Evaluation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2006.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
10
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Enhancing Philanthropy’s Support of Biomedical Scientists: Proceedings of a Workshop on Evaluation
  • They loved that the Markey Trust had faith in them. The scholars frequently stated that they thought the committee was focused on helping them achieve their personal and research-oriented goals. That is, they felt that the committee was determined to help them succeed as individuals, rather than worrying about whether a particular project was followed through to completion.

  • In hindsight they appreciated the lack of bureaucracy imposed by the Markey Trust and the flexibility produced by this trust in the scholars. Scholars appreciated the fact that changing directions on their projects or even changing institutions was not a major obstacle tied to time-consuming paperwork.

  • Even for academic superstars, the supportive atmosphere was highly appreciated, and several scholars mentioned that the “pat on the back” they received at the meetings meant more than the funds.

  • The intellectual stimulation provided by the scientific meetings, even though much of it was outside the scholars’ own area of expertise, was invigorating and prepared them for a more broad-minded approach to science.

The following comment made during one interview is representative of the appreciation the Scholars felt for this award.

The thing I always appreciated about the Markey Trust was that, once you had made it through the selection process, the Trustees always rooted for you no matter what. The whole philosophy of the program was to find people who they thought had a good potential and fund them.

Page
10
FrontMatter (R1-R12)
The Lucille P. Markey Charitable Trust Scholars Program--Krystyna R. Isaacs (1-10)
The Doris Duke Clinical Scientist Development Award: A Seven-Year Retrospective and Summary--Jessica C. Fanzo and Elaine K. Gallin (11-20)
Burroughs Wellcome Fund Evaluation Strategy--Martin Ionescu-Pioggia and Georgine Pion (21-42)
Searle Scholars Program: Selection and Evaluation of Searle Scholars--Douglas M. Fambrough (43-51)
Research Program Evaluation at the American Heart Association--Patricia C. Hinton (52-65)
Analysis of the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation Fellowship Program (1947–2003)--Amy L. Francis (66-72)
Evaluation Activities of the American Cancer Society--Ralph Vogler (73-78)
Program Evaluation at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation--Nancy Fishman (79-88)
Exploring Program Effects on Life Sciences Faculty Diversity: Assessing the Ford Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowships for Minorities--Connie L. McNeely and Christine O’Brien (89-98)
Program Assessment in HHMI-Sponsored Medical Student Research Training Programs--Min K. Lee, Barbara Ziff, and William R. Galey (99-105)
Outcomes and Impacts of the National Science Foundation’s Minority Postdoctoral Research Fellowships Program--Carter Kimsey (106-110)
Evaluation of Research Training and Career Development Programs at NIH: Current Capabilities and Continuing Needs--Charles R. Sherman (111-122)
A Workshop Agenda (123-126)
B Biographical Sketches of Workshop Speakers (127-132)
C Workshop Participants (133-134)