National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Front Matter
Suggested Citation:"Highlights." Transportation Research Board, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 2006. Improving Road Safety in Developing Countries: Opportunities for U.S. Cooperation and Engagement, Workshop Summary -- Special Report 287. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11647.
×

Highlights

In January 2006, the National Academies convened a workshop entitled “Improving Road Safety in Developing Countries: Opportunities for U.S. Cooperation and Engagement.” The goal of the workshop was to provide a view of the diversity of U.S. interests affected by the worldwide problem of road traffic deaths and injuries, the scope of activities of U.S. agencies addressing the problem, and prospects for further U.S. engagement. The workshop discussions were intended to help the responsible government agencies gauge whether the U.S. response is proportional to the interests at stake and to identify next steps toward a more effective response.

The major points made by participants during the workshop discussions include the following:

  • The scale of the road safety problem is large (1.2 million deaths annually) and growing rapidly with increased motorization in the developing world. It is projected that in 2030 road traffic injuries will cause nearly 3 percent of all deaths worldwide, up from 2 percent in 2002. Experience indicates that certain interventions to reduce road injuries have the potential to be highly cost-effective compared with other large-scale international public health programs.

Suggested Citation:"Highlights." Transportation Research Board, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 2006. Improving Road Safety in Developing Countries: Opportunities for U.S. Cooperation and Engagement, Workshop Summary -- Special Report 287. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11647.
×
  • The United States has capabilities to assist developing countries with the problem. Over decades of motorization, it has developed professional and institutional strengths across many sectors: data systems, road and vehicle standards, emergency medical care, intervention programs, and enforcement and adjudication.

  • U.S. engagement with the problem, occurring through the efforts of government agencies and nongovernmental organizations, is at a low level compared with the scale of the problem. Activities in some agencies are aimed principally at protecting U.S. citizens traveling abroad as workers or tourists. Other government activities address aspects of the problem that affect trade and commerce, such as vehicle safety standards and cross-border trucking operations. Some assistance is provided to developing nations for research, data systems, and professional exchanges. U.S. agencies participate in road safety programs of the United Nations and the World Health Organization, although the scale of these multilateral efforts has been modest. U.S. nongovernmental organizations are participating in technical exchange and public communication programs in developing countries.

  • According to government participants, stronger and more systematic collaboration among U.S. agencies and between government and private entities would increase the effectiveness of U.S. efforts. Such collaboration is important because the most effective actions would involve several sectors, including transportation, health care, emergency services, law enforcement, and education.

  • If the United States became more engaged in efforts to reduce global road traffic injuries, it might be able to increase the effectiveness of its contributions by learning from the experience of other nations and international organizations. That experience indicates that the most effective interventions focus on institutional capacity building in the transportation, health, enforcement, and public administration sectors; entail long-term commitments by all parties; and incorporate monitoring and evaluation of outcomes.

  • U.S. programs also could derive lessons from the response to other global health crises, including the HIV/AIDS epidemic. The lag between recognition of the epidemic and the scaling up of a meaningful response

Suggested Citation:"Highlights." Transportation Research Board, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 2006. Improving Road Safety in Developing Countries: Opportunities for U.S. Cooperation and Engagement, Workshop Summary -- Special Report 287. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11647.
×

resulted in enormous numbers of deaths and illnesses and marked increases in the costs of prevention and treatment. Mounting a large-scale response required scientific evidence of the magnitude of the threat and the effectiveness of interventions, political will to commit resources, and a social strategy for organizing effective interventions.

  • Increasing the effectiveness of the U.S. response to the global road safety problem would require planning in the government agencies concerned, first, to identify opportunities for more effective U.S. contributions with existing resources, and second, to identify initial elements of a U.S. program if new funds were made available. Careful planning could help ensure that U.S. participation would support cost-effective interventions and contribute to achieving overall policy objectives with regard to international development. Planning would also involve assembling the evidence that engagement would serve U.S. interests, while also making the ethical case for engagement.

Suggested Citation:"Highlights." Transportation Research Board, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 2006. Improving Road Safety in Developing Countries: Opportunities for U.S. Cooperation and Engagement, Workshop Summary -- Special Report 287. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11647.
×

This page intially left blank

Suggested Citation:"Highlights." Transportation Research Board, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 2006. Improving Road Safety in Developing Countries: Opportunities for U.S. Cooperation and Engagement, Workshop Summary -- Special Report 287. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11647.
×
Page 1
Suggested Citation:"Highlights." Transportation Research Board, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 2006. Improving Road Safety in Developing Countries: Opportunities for U.S. Cooperation and Engagement, Workshop Summary -- Special Report 287. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11647.
×
Page 2
Suggested Citation:"Highlights." Transportation Research Board, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 2006. Improving Road Safety in Developing Countries: Opportunities for U.S. Cooperation and Engagement, Workshop Summary -- Special Report 287. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11647.
×
Page 3
Suggested Citation:"Highlights." Transportation Research Board, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council. 2006. Improving Road Safety in Developing Countries: Opportunities for U.S. Cooperation and Engagement, Workshop Summary -- Special Report 287. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11647.
×
Page 4
Next: Workshop Summary »
Improving Road Safety in Developing Countries: Opportunities for U.S. Cooperation and Engagement, Workshop Summary -- Special Report 287 Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!

TRB, the Policy and Global Affairs Division (PGA), and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) have released TRB Special Report 287, Improving Road Safety in Developing Countries: Opportunities for U.S. Cooperation and Engagement. The report summarizes presentations and discussions at a workshop held on January 26-27, 2006, in Washington, D.C. The workshop focused on the sharp increases in road traffic-related deaths and injuries in developing countries with a goal of providing a view of the diversity of U.S. interests, the scope of activities of U.S. agencies addressing this problem, and prospects for further U.S. engagement. The workshop discussions were intended to help the responsible government agencies gauge whether the U.S. response is proportional to the interests at stake and to identify next steps toward a more effective response. PGA and IOM, like TRB, are part of the National Academies, which include the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!