these sites. In any systematic review, another concern is publication bias that may arise from potentially slanted decisions, ranging from researchers’ choices of what to study and report, to the tendency of the publication process itself to select for positive findings.

REFERENCES

Becklake M. 1976. Asbestos-related diseases of the lung and other organs: Their epidemiology and implications for clinical practice. American Review of Respiratory Disease 114(1): 187-227.

Hamilton A, Hardy H. 1974. Industrial toxicology. In: Asbestos-Related Diseases of the Lung and Other Organs: Their Epidemiology and Implications for Clinical Practice. 3rd edition. Acton, MA: Publishing Sciences Group, Inc. Pp. 421.

HEW (US Department of Health Education and Welfare). 1964. Smoking and Health: Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon General. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

HHS (US Department of Health and Human Services). 2004. Asbestos CAS No. 1332-21-4. In: 11th Report on Carcinogens. Washington, DC: National Toxicology Program.

Hill A. 1965. The environment and disease: Association or causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 58: 295-300.

Liddell F. 1997. Magic, menace, myth and malice. Annals of Occupational Hygiene 41(1): 3-12.

Ross M, Nolan R. 2003. History of asbestos discovery and use and asbestos-related disease in context with the occurrence of asbestos within ophiolite complexes. Geological Society of America Special Paper 373: 447-470.

Virta RL. 2002. Asbestos. Mineral Yearbook. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement