National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

About | Ordering | New

Menu menu

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$43.75
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Alternatives to the Indian Point Energy Center for Meeting New York Electric Power Needs (2006)
Board on Energy and Environmental Systems (BEES)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix D Supply Technologies." Alternatives to the Indian Point Energy Center for Meeting New York Electric Power Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2006.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan
Page
94
bottomleft bottomright
  E-mail
Share on facebook Facebook
Share on delicious Delicious
Share on stumbleupon Stumble
Share on twitter Twitter
More Sharing ServicesMore

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.

Alternatives to the Indian Point Energy Center for Meeting New York Electric Power Needs

APPENDIX D-2
ZONAL ENERGY AND SEASONAL CAPACITY IN NEW YORK STATE, 2004 AND 2005Parker Mathusa and Erin Hogan1

TABLE D-2-1 Summary of Summer and Winter Capacity, Energy Production, and Energy Requirements in the New York Control Area, by Zone

 

Summer Capacity (MW)

Winter Capacity (MW)

Energy (GWh)

Energy Requirements (GWh)

Energy Production/ Demand Index

Zonea

2004

2005

% ∆

2004

2005

% ∆

2004

2005

% ∆

2004

2005

% ∆

2004

2005

% ∆

A

5,216

5,083

–2.55

5,314

5,212

–1.93

26,963

32,080

18.98

15,942

16,106

1.03

1.69

1.99

17.77

B

950

950

–0.07

971

972

0.05

5,738

6,258

9.07

9,719

9,911

1.98

0.59

0.63

6.95

C

6,651

6,617

–0.51

6,859

6,884

0.36

29,821

27,263

–8.58

16,794

16,830

0.21

1.78

1.62

–8.77

D

1,268

1,262

–0.50

1,182

1,277

8.08

8,505

9,153

7.62

5,912

5,782

–2.20

1.44

1.58

10.04

E

886

871

–1.74

947

946

–0.11

3,165

1,404

–55.63

6,950

7,044

1.35

0.46

0.20

–56.22

F

3,608

3,111

–13.78

3,720

3,535

–4.97

7,726

8,508

10.12

11,115

11,161

0.41

0.70

0.76

9.67

G

3,501

3,421

–2.28

3,575

3,512

–1.77

9,327

9,213

–1.22

10,452

10,640

1.80

0.89

0.87

–2.96

H

2,079

2,069

–0.46

2,102

2,100

–0.06

16,297

16,638

2.10

2,219

2,276

2.57

7.34

7.31

–0.46

I

3.5

2.9

–17.24

3

3

–3.25

4

8

107.93

6,121

6,184

1.03

0.00

0.00

105.81

J

8,894

8,981

0.99

9,455

9,705

2.65

20,352

21,821

7.22

50,829

52,073

2.45

0.40

0.42

4.66

K

5,054

5,180

2.48

5,375

5,509

2.49

15,565

14,822

–4.78

21,960

22,203

1.11

0.71

0.67

–5.82

Statewide

38,111

37,548

–1.48

39,504

39,655

0.38

143,463

147,169

2.58

158,014

160,210

1.39

0.91

0.92

1.18

aThe New York Control Area’s load zones are A, West; B, Genesee; C, Central; D, North; E, Mohawk Valley; F, Capital; G, Hudson Valley; H, Millwood; I, Dunwoodie; J, New York City; and K, Long Island.

SOURCE: NYISO (2005).

1

Parker Mathusa is a member of the Committee on Alternatives to Indian Point for Meeting Energy Needs. Erin Hogan is with the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority.
Page
94