Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 21
SELECTED References Berger, M. Expert Testimony: The Supreme Court's Rules. Issues in Science and Technology,Summer 2000, pp. 57-63. De Angelis C, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, Haug C, Hoey J, Horton R, et al. Clinical trial registration a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:477-8. Epub 2004 Sep 8. Dixon, L., and B. Gill. Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases Since the Daubert Decision. Rand Institute for Civil Justice, 2001. Frankel, M.S. The Evolving Role of Scientific Experts in the Courts. The Journal of Philosophy,Science and Law Vol. 1, November 2001. Greenland, Sander, The Need for Critical Appraisal of Expert Witnesses in Epidemiology and Statistics, Wake Forest Law Review, Vol. 35, 2004, pp. 291-310. Hooper, L.L., Cecil, J.S., and T.E. Willging. Assessing Causation in Breast Implant Litigation:The Role of Science Panels. Law and Contemporary Problems 64(4):139-184, Autumn 2001. Hulka, et al. Experience of a Scientific Panel Formed to Advise the Federal Judiciary on Silicone Breast Implants. The New England Journal of Medicine 342(11):812-815, 2000. Kassirer, J.P., and J.S. Cecil. Inconsistency in Evidentiary Standards for Medical Testimony: Disorder in the Courts. Journal of the American Medical Association 288(11): 1382-1387, 2002. Krafka, C., et al. Judges and Attorney Experiences, Practices, and Concerns Regarding Expert Testimony in Federal Civil Trials. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law (8)3:309-332, 2002. Parascandola M, Weed DL. Causation in epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health 55:905-912, 2001. Weed, D.L. Causation: An Epidemiological Perspective. Journal of Law and Policy 43:43-53, 2003. Legal Citations Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993). Frye v. United States (1923). General Electric v. Joiner (1997). Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael (1999). 21
OCR for page 22
Representative terms from entire chapter: