|
|
82. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA). Codified at 15 U.S.C. 2051-2084. Public Law 92-573; 86 Stat. 1207, Oct. 27, 1972.
|
|
|
83. Federal Hazardous Substances Act (FHSA). Codified at 15 U.S.C. 1261-1278. Public Law 86-613; 74 Stat. 372, July 12, 1960, as amended.
|
|
|
84. Federal Hazardous Substances Act (FHSA). Codified at 15 U.S.C. 1261-1278. Public Law 86-613; 74 Stat. 372, July 12, 1960, as amended.
|
|
|
85. Federal Hazardous Substances Act (FHSA). Codified at 15 U.S.C. 1261-1278. Public Law 86-613; 74 Stat. 372, July 12, 1960, as amended.
|
|
|
86. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). 2005. 2006 Performance Budget Request: Saving Lives and Keeping Families Safe. February.
|
|
|
87. J. Bromme. 2005. Nanotechnology and the consumer product safety commission. Product Safety & Liability Reporter 33(11; March 14).
|
|
|
88. F. Schrotter, American National Standards Institute, presentation to this committee, March 24, 2005.
|
|
|
89. See http://www.ansi.org/standards_activities/standards_boards_panels/nsp/overview.aspx?menuid=3#news, accessed March 2006.
|
|
|
90. P. Picariello, ASTM International, presentation to this committee, March 24, 2005.
|
|
|
91. D. Gamota, Motorola, presentation to this committee, March 24, 2005.
|
|
|
92. D.M. Berube, University of South Carolina, presentation to this committee, February 11, 2005.
|
|
|
93. D. Rejeski, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, presentation to this committee, February 11, 2005.
|
|
|
94. N. Jacobstein, Institute for Molecular Manufacturing, presentation to this committee, February 11, 2005.
|
|
|
95. D. Rolison, Naval Research Laboratory, presentation to this committee, March 25, 2005.
|
|
|
96. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. 1992. The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
|
|
|
97. National Research Council. 1989. Field Testing Genetically Modified Organisms: Framework for Decisions. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
|
|
|
98. Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2004. Safety of Genetically Engineered Foods: Approaches to Assessing Unintended Health Effects. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
|
|
|
99. G. Hunt, Nanotechnology and survival—Ethics and organisational accountability, paper delivered at the Institute for Seizon and the Life Sciences, July 5, 2003, Tokyo. Available at http://www.freedomtocare.org/page316.htm.
|
|
|
100. In this regard, the committee notes that NNI-participating agencies are funding research on the novel properties and biological and environmental effects of some nanomaterials that have already been introduced into the environment.
|
|
|
101. G. Khushf, University of South Carolina, presentation to this committee, March 25, 2005.
|
|
|
102. G. Khushf, University of South Carolina, presentation to this committee, March 25, 2005.
|
|
|
103. Plato. Phaedrus.
|
|
|
104. J. Macoubrie. 2005. Informed Public Perceptions of Nanotechnology and Trust in Government. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies.
|
|
|
105. J. Macoubrie. 2005. Informed Public Perceptions of Nanotechnology and Trust in Government. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies.
|
|
|
106. See http://www.nanojury.org/, accessed March 2006.
|
|
|
107. Nanotechnology Interdisciplinary Research Team. Undated. From laboratory to society: Developing an informed approach to nanoscale science and technology. Grant 0304448. Nano Science and Technology Studies, University of South Carolina. See http://nsts.nano.sc.edu/nirt.html.
|
