National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$69.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks (2007)
Food and Nutrition Board (FNB)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix B Data Tables." Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
495
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

High omega-3 fat vs. low omega-3 fat/control

Intake differed by 0.1-0.6 g omega-3/day among the two groups (absolute levels not specified)

Based on RCTs, no significant differences were found between the high omega-3 fat group and the low omega-3 fat/control group with regards to risk of mortality (n=15 RCTs; RR=0.87, 95% CI 0.73-1.03), cardiovascular events (n=18 RCTs; RR=0.95, 95% CI 0.82-1.12), cancer or death from cancer (n=10 RCTs; RR=1.07, 95% CI 0.88-1.30), or stroke (n=9 RCTs; RR=1.17, 95% CI 0.91-1.51).

Based on cohorts, no significant differences were found between the high omega-3 fat group and the low omega-3 fat/control group with regards to risk of cardiovascular events (n=7 cohorts; RR=0.91, 95% CI 0.73-1.13), cancer or death from cancer (n=7 cohorts; RR=1.02, 95% CI 0.87-1.19), or stroke (n=4 cohorts; RR=0.87, 95% CI 0.72-1.04).

Based on three cohorts, those in the low omega-3 fat/control group had a significantly higher risk of mortality compared to those in the high omega-3 fat group (RR=0.65, 95% CI 0.48-0.88).

N

Page
495