National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$69.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks (2007)
Food and Nutrition Board (FNB)

Citation Manager

. "3 Health Benefits Associated with Nutrients in Seafood." Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
69
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks

TABLE 3-1 Differences in Saturated Fat Content Between Commonly Consumed Animal Food Products

Food Category

Portion Size (ounces)

Saturated Fat (grams)

Calories (kcal)

Cheese

 

 

 

Regular cheddar cheese

1

6.0

114

Low-fat cheddar cheese

1

1.2

49

Ground beef

 

 

 

Regular ground beef (25% fat)

3 (cooked)

6.1

236

Extra lean ground beef (5% fat)

3 (cooked)

2.5

145

Chicken

 

 

 

Fried chicken (with skin)

3

3.4

229

Roasted chicken (no skin)

3

0.9

130

Fish

 

 

 

Fried fish (catfish)

3

2.8

195

Baked fish (catfish)

3

1.5

129

SOURCE: USDA, Release 18.

The 1994–1996 Continuing Survey of Food Intake by Individuals (CSFII) identified several micronutrients that were consumed at levels below the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA), including vitamins E and B-6, calcium, iron, magnesium, and zinc. Seafood is a good source of zinc and some calcium, e.g., from canned salmon or other fish with bones, which may contribute to the total intake of these nutrients when substituted for other animal food products. For example, a 3-ounce cooked serving of beef, lamb, chicken, or pork contains approximately 10–20 mg of calcium, whereas a 3-ounce serving of canned salmon with bones contains approximately 240 mg. (Source: http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/Data/SR18/sr18.html.)

Nutritional Benefits Associated with Omega-3 Fatty Acids

Optimal Intake Levels for EPA and DHA

There are insufficient data on the distribution of requirements to set an Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) for alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), so an Adequate Intake (AI) was set instead, at approximately the level of current intakes (IOM, 2002/2005). Given that ALA conversion to EPA and DHA is low and variable (Burdge, 2004), intakes of the preformed omega-3 fatty acids may be less than desired under certain physiologic circumstances (see Chapter 2). Despite the number of studies conducted over the past two decades to assess the impact of omega-3 fatty acids in general on health outcomes, optimal intake levels for EPA and DHA are still not defined. The Dietary Reference Intakes (IOM, 2002/2005) did not establish a require-

Page
69