National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Third Report of the National Academy of Engineering/National Research Council Committee on New Orleans Regional Hurricane Protection Projects (2006)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix D: Acknowledgement of Reviewers." Third Report of the National Academy of Engineering/National Research Council Committee on New Orleans Regional Hurricane Protection Projects. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2006.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
24
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Third Report of the National Academy of Engineering/National Research Council Committee on New Orleans Regional Hurricane Protection Projects

APPENDIX D
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REVIEWERS

This report was reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise in accordance with the procedures approved by the NRC’s Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the NRC in making its published report as sound as possible, and to ensure that the report meets NRC institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process.


We thank the following for their review of this report: Keith W. Bedford, Ohio State University; John J. Cassidy, Bechtel Corporation (retired); Robert A. Dalrymple, Johns Hopkins University; Russell L. Elsberry, U.S. Naval Postgraduate School; Paul H. Gilbert, Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade, and Douglas, Inc.: Lester B. Lave, Carnegie Mellon University; and, Robert V. Whitman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.


Although these reviewers provided constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the report’s conclusions and recommendations, nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by Robert A. Frosch, Harvard University, who was appointed by the NRC’s Report Review Committee, and by Norbert R. Morgenstern, University of Alberta, who was appointed by the NRC’s Division on Earth and Life Studies. Drs. Frosch and Morgenstern were responsible for ensuring that an independent examination of this report was conducted in accordance with NRC institutional procedures and that all review comments received full consideration. Responsibility for this report’s final contents rests entirely with the authoring committee and the NRC.

Page
24

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 24
Third Report of the National Academy of Engineering/National Research Council Committee on New Orleans Regional Hurricane Protection Projects APPENDIX D ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REVIEWERS This report was reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise in accordance with the procedures approved by the NRC’s Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the NRC in making its published report as sound as possible, and to ensure that the report meets NRC institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We thank the following for their review of this report: Keith W. Bedford, Ohio State University; John J. Cassidy, Bechtel Corporation (retired); Robert A. Dalrymple, Johns Hopkins University; Russell L. Elsberry, U.S. Naval Postgraduate School; Paul H. Gilbert, Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade, and Douglas, Inc.: Lester B. Lave, Carnegie Mellon University; and, Robert V. Whitman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Although these reviewers provided constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the report’s conclusions and recommendations, nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by Robert A. Frosch, Harvard University, who was appointed by the NRC’s Report Review Committee, and by Norbert R. Morgenstern, University of Alberta, who was appointed by the NRC’s Division on Earth and Life Studies. Drs. Frosch and Morgenstern were responsible for ensuring that an independent examination of this report was conducted in accordance with NRC institutional procedures and that all review comments received full consideration. Responsibility for this report’s final contents rests entirely with the authoring committee and the NRC.

Representative terms from entire chapter:

cambridge john