National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 6 Conclusions and Recommendations
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×

References

Abrams, P.A. 1991 The predictive ability of peer review of grant proposals: The case of ecology and the U.S. National Science Foundation. Social Studies of Science 21:111-132.

Adams, E.K., M.R. Meiners, and B.O. Burwell 1992 A Synthesis and Critique of Studies on Medicaid Asset Spenddown. January. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available: http://aspe.hhs.gov/daltcp/reports/syncri.htm [accessed Nov. 2006].

Adams, P., M. Hurd, D. McFadden, A. Merrill, and T. Ribeiro 2003 Healthy, wealthy, and wise? Tests for direct causal paths between health and socio-economic status. Journal of Econometrics 112(1):3-56.

Adda, J., T. Chandola, and M. Marmot 2003 Socio-economic status and health: Causality and pathways. Journal of Econometrics 112(1):57-63.

American Sociological Association 2006 Social science consortium hosts U.S. science advisor, NSF, and NIH social science leadership. Footnotes 34(1):1, 4.

Arber, S, J. McKinlay, A. Adams, L. Marceau, C. Link, and A. O’Donnell 2006 Patient characteristics and inequalities in doctors’ diagnostic and management strategies relating to CHD: A video-simulation experiment. Social Science and Medicine 62(1):103-115.

Arkes, H.R. 2003 The nonuse of psychological research at two federal agencies. Psychological Science 14:1-6.

Arrow, K. 1962 Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. Pp. 609-626 in Richard R. Nelson, ed., The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×

Ash, M. 2003 Psychology. Pp. 251-274 in T. Porter and D. Ross, eds., The Cambridge History of Science, Vol. 7. The Modern Social Sciences. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Association for Psychological Science 2005 NIH advisory panel calls for stable home for basic behavioral science. Association for Psychological Science Observer 18(February).

Balas, E., and S. Boren 2000 Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. Pp. 65-70 in V. Schattauer, ed., Yearbook of Medical Informatics. Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer Publishing.

Bales, R.F. 1950 Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Barker, D.J.P., J.G. Eriksson, T. Forsén, and C. Osmond 2002 Fetal origins of adult disease: Strength of effects and biological basis. International Journal of Epidemiology 31:1235-1239.

Behavioral and Social Research Program, National Institute on Aging 2004 Behavioral and Social Research Program. (Informational CD-Rom, April, Version 6.0). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Aging.

Behn, R.D., and J.V. Vaupel 1982 Quick Analysis for Busy Decision Makers. New York: Basic Books.

Ben-David, J. 1971 The Scientist’s Role in Society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Berg, J., and T. Rietz 2003 Prediction markets as decision support systems. Information Systems Frontiers 5(1):79-93.

Bernal, J.D. 1939 The Social Function of Science. New York: Macmillan.

Blank, R.M. 1991 The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: Experimental evidence from the American Economic Review. American Economic Review 81:1041-1067.

Boix-Mansilla, V., and H. Gardner 2003 Assessing interdisciplinary work at the frontier. An empirical exploration of “symptoms of quality.” Available: http://www.interdisciplines.org/interdisciplinarity/papers/6/2 [accessed Nov. 2006].

Boix-Mansilla, V., I. Feller, and H. Gardner 2006 Quality assessment in interdisciplinary research and education. Research Evaluation 15(1):69-74(6).

Bonvillian, W.B., and K.V. Sharp 2001 Homeland security technology. Issues in Science and Technology Winter. Available: http://www.issues.org/18.2/bonvillian.html [accessed Nov. 2006].

Boomsma, D., G. Willemsen, C.V. Dolan, L.C. Hawkley, and J.T. Cacioppo 2005 Genetic and environmental contributions to loneliness in adults: The Netherlands Twin Register Study. Behavior Genetics 35(6):745-752.

Bornmann, L., and H.-D. Daniel 2005 Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review—A citation analysis of previous publications by successful and non-successful post-doctoral research fellow applicants. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, July 24-28, Stockholm, Sweden.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×

Bourdieu, P. 1988 Homo Academicus. (Translated by Peter Collier). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Bowler, P., and I. Morus 2005 Making Modern Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Boyack, K., and K. Börner 2003 Indicator assisted evaluation of funding of research: Visualizing the influence of grants on the number and citation counts of research papers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54:447-461.

Bozeman, B., and J. Melkers, eds. 1993 Evaluating R&D Impacts: Methods and Practice. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Bozeman, B., and D. Sarewitz 2005 Public values and public failure in U.S. science policy. Science and Public Policy 32:119-136.

Brenneis, D. 1994 Discourse and discipline at the National Research Council: A bureaucratic bildungsroman. Cultural Anthropology 9:23-36.

Bretschneider, S. 1993 Operations research contributions to evaluation of R&D projects. Pp. 123-153 in B. Bozeman and J. Melkers, eds., Evaluating R&D Impacts: Methods and Practice. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Bromley, A. 2003 What criteria should be used to establish funding priorities? Physics Today 56(6):54-55.

Brooks, H. 1965 Future needs for the support of basic research. Pp. 77-110 in National Research Council, Research and National Goals. Report to the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives. Washington, DC: Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office.

Brunner, E.J., H. Hemingway, B.R. Walker, M. Page, P. Clarke, M. Juneja, M.J. Shipley, M. Kumari, R. Andrew, J.R. Seckl, A. Papadopoulos, S. Checkley, A. Rumley, G.D. Lowe, S.A. Stansfield, and M.G. Marmot 2002 Adrenocortical, autonomic and inflammatory causes of the metabolic syndrome: Nested case-control study. Circulation 106:2659-2665.

Bruun, H., J. Hukkinen, K. Huutoniemi, and J. Thompson Klein 2005 Promoting Interdisciplinary Research: The Case of the Academy of Finland. Helsinki: Academy of Finland.

Butler, L. 2004 What happens when funding is linked to publication counts? Pp. 389-405 in H. Moed, W. Glanzel, and U. Schmooch, eds., Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Camic, C., and N. Gross 1998 Contemporary developments in sociological theory: Current projects and conditions of possibility. Annual Review of Sociology 24:453-476.

Campanario, J. 1998a Peer review for journals as it stands today: Part 1. Science Communication 19:181-211.

1998b Peer review for journals as it stands today: Part 2. Science Communication 19:277-306.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×

Caplan, N. 1976 Social research and national policy: What gets used, by whom, for what purposes, and with what effects? International Social Science Journal 28(1):187-194.

Carey, J.R. 2003 Longevity: The Biology and Demography of Life Span. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Carey J.R., and S. Tuljapurkar, eds. 2003 Life span: Evolutionary, ecological and demographic perspectives. Population and Development Review 29 (Suppl):1-320.

Carey, J.R., P. Liedo, H.G. Muller, J.L. Wang, Y. Zhang, and L. Harshman 2005 Stochastic dietary restriction using a Markov-chain feeding protocol elicits complex, life history response in Medflies. Aging Cell 4(1):31-39.

Cargill, S.L., J.R. Carey, H.G. Muller, and G. Anderson 2003 Age of ovary determines remaining life expectancy in old ovariectomized mice. Aging Cell 2:185-190.

Cerf, C., and V. Navasky 1984 The Experts Speak: The Definitive Compendium of Authoritative Misinformation. New York: Pantheon Books.

Cetina, K.K. 1999 Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Chernew, M.E., D.P. Goldman, F. Pan, and B.P. Shang 2005 Disability and health care spending among Medicare beneficiaries. Health Affairs 24:W5R42-WR4R52.

Christensen, K., H. Støvring, and M. McGue 2001a Do genetic factors contribute to the association between birth weight and blood pressure? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 55:583-587.

Christensen K., A. Wienke, A. Skytthe, N.V. Holm, J.W. Vaupel, and A.I. Yashin 2001b Cardiovascular mortality in twins and the fetal origins hypothesis. Twin Research 4(5):344-349.

Chubin, D., and E. Hackett 1990 Peerless Science. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Clemen, R. 1991 Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis. Boston, MA: PWS-Kent.

Clements, E., W. Powell, K. McIlwaine, and D. Okamoto 1995 Careers in print: Books, journals, and scholarly publications. American Journal of Sociology 101:433-494.

Cohen, I.B. 1985 Revolution in Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cole, J., and S. Cole 1981 Peer Review in the National Science Foundation: Phase Two of a Study. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Cole, S. 1983 The hierarchy of the sciences? American Journal of Sociology 89:111-139.

1992 Making Science: Between Nature and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

2001 Why sociology doesn’t make progress like the natural sciences. Pp. 37-60 in S. Cole, ed., What’s Wrong with Sociology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×

Cole, S., L. Rubin, and J. Cole 1978 Peer Review in the National Science Foundation: Phase One of a Study. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Cole, S., J. Cole, and G. Simon 1981 Chance and consensus in peer review. Science 214:881-886.

Colwell, R. 1998 The National Science Foundation’s Role in the Arctic. Paper presented at Opportunities in Arctic Research: A Community Workshop, September 3, Arlington, VA.

Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy 1993 Science, Technology and the Federal Government: National Goals for a New Era. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

1997 International Benchmarking of U.S. Mathematics Research. Panel on International Benchmarking of U.S. Mathematics Research, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

1998 International Benchmarking of U.S. Materials Science and Engineering Research. Panel on International Benchmarking of U.S. Mathematics Research. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

1999a Evaluating Federal Research Programs: Research and the Government Performance and Results Act. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

1999b International Benchmarking of U.S. Immunology Research. Panel on International Benchmarking. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

2000 Experiments in International Benchmarking of U.S. Research Fields. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

2004 Setting Priorities for Large Research Facility Projects Supported by the National Science Foundation. Committee on Setting Priorities for NSF-Sponsored Large Research Facility Projects. Policy and Global Affairs Division. Board on Physics and Astronomy, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Committee on Science and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives 1982 Setting Priorities for Science. (Hearings). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Costa, D. 2003 Understanding mid-life and older age mortality declines: Evidence from Union Army veterans. Journal of Econometrics 112:175-192.

Cozzens, S. 1997 The knowledge pool: Measurement challenges in evaluating fundamental research programs. Evaluation and Program Planning 20:77-89.

Cozzens, S.E., K. Bobb, and I. Bortagaray 2002 Evaluating the distributional consequences of science and technology policies and programs. Research Evaluation 11:101-107.

Crane, D. 1972 Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×

Cutler, D.M. 2003 Aging, natural death and the compression of morbidity. New England Journal of Medicine 349(11):1048-1055.

David, P. 1994 Difficulties in assessing the performance of research and development programs. Pp. 293-302 in A. Teich, S. Nelson, and C. McEnaney, eds., AAAS Science and Technology Policy Yearbook—1994. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Deaton, A. 2002 Policy implications of the gradient of health and wealth. Health Affairs 21:13-30.

Deutsch, K.W., J. Platt, and D. Senghaas 1971 Conditions favoring major advances in social science. Science 171:450-459.

Dirk, L. 1999 A measure of originality: The elements of science. Social Studies of Science 29:765-776.

Dogan, M., and R. Pahre 1990 Creative Marginality: Innovation at the Intersections of Social Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview.

Edwards, W. 1954 The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin 51:380-417.

Espeland, W.N., and M.L. Stevens 1998 Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology 24:313-343.

Evenson, R., P. Waggoner, and V. Ruttan 1979 Economic benefits from research: An example from agriculture. Science 205:1101-1107.

Ezrahi, Y. 1978 Political contexts of science indicators. Pp. 285-322 in Y. Elkana, J. Lederberg, R.K. Merton, A. Thackray, and H. Zuckerman, eds., Toward A Metric of Science, The Advent of Science Indicators. New York: Wiley.

Ezzati, M., A.D. Lopez, A. Rodgers, S. Vanderhorn, C.J.L. Murray, and the Comparative Risk Assessment Collaborating Group 2002 Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet 360:1347-1360. Available: http://lib.haifa.ac.il/www/mesila/nutrition/gurmi%20sikun.pdf [accessed Nov. 2006].

Feller, I. 1992 Alternative Models of Research Performance. Final Report, Office of Technology Assessment, Contract Number I3-4065.0.

1996 The determinants of research competitiveness among universities. Pp. 35-72 in A. Teich, ed., Competitiveness in Academic Research. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

2002 Performance measurement redux. American Journal of Evaluation 23:435-452.

2006 Multiple actors, multiple settings, multiple criteria: Issues in assessing interdisciplinary research. Research Evaluation 15(1):5-15.

Fischhoff, B. 2000 Scientific management of science? Policy Sciences 33:73-87.

Fisher, E.S., D.E. Weinberg, T.A. Stukel, D.J. Gottlieb, F.L. Lucas, and E.L. Pinder 2003a The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: The content, quality, and accessibility of health care. Annals of Internal Medicine 138:273-287.

2003b The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: Health outcomes and satisfaction with care. Annals of Internal Medicine 138:288-298.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×

Freedman, V.A., H. Aykan, and L.G. Martin 2001 Aggregate changes in severe cognitive impairment among older Americans: 1993 and 1998. Journal of Gerontology B: Social Sciences 56(2):S100-S111.

Freedman, V.A., L.G. Martin, and R.F. Schoeni 2002 Recent trends in disability and functioning among older adults in the United States: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association 288:3137-3146.

Freeman, R., E. Weinstein, E. Marincola, J. Rosenbaum, and F. Solomon 2001 Competition and careers in biosciences. Science 294:2293-2294.

Fri, R. 2004 Methodology for Estimating Prospective Benefits of Energy Efficiency and Fossil Energy R&D. Letter to D. Garman and M. Maddox, U.S. Department of Energy on behalf of National Research Council Board on Energy and Environmental Systems, November 15.

Frist, W. 2002 Federal funding for biomedical research: Commitment and benefits. Journal of the American Medical Association 287:1722-1724.

Furner, M. 1975 Advocacy and Objectivity. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.

Galison, P. 1999 Trading zone: Coordinating action and beliefs. Pp. 137-160 in M. Baglioli, ed., The Science Studies Reader. London, England: Routledge.

Garfinkel, H. 1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Geisler, E. 2000 The Metrics of Science and Technology. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

Gerstein, D. 1986 Introduction. Pp. 1-20 in National Research Council, Behavioral and Social Sciences, Fifty Years of Discovery. N. Smelser and D. Gerstein, eds. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow 1994 The New Production of Knowledge. London, England: Sage Publications.

Glanzel, W., and A. Schubert 2004 Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. Pp. 257-276 in H. Moed, W. Glanzel, and U. Schmooch, eds., Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Glei, D.A., D.A. Landau, N. Goldman, Y.L. Chuang, G. Rodriguez, and M. Weinstein 2005 Participating in social activities helps preserve cognitive function: An analysis of a longitudinal, population-based study of the elderly. International Journal of Epidemiology 34:864-871.

Godin, B. 2002 Outline for a history of science measurement. Science, Technology and Human Values 27:3-27.

Goldman, D.P., B.P. Shang, J. Bhattacharya, A.M. Garber, M. Hurd, G.F. Joyce, D.N. Lakdawalla, C. Panis, and P.G. Shekele 2005 Consequences of Health Trends and Medical Innovation for the Future Elderly. Available: http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/hlthaff.w5.r5 [accessed Nov. 2006].

Gramlich, E. 1981 Benefit Cost Analysis of Government Programs. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×

Greenberg, D. 2001 Science, Money, and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Gross, C.P., G.F. Anderson, and N.R. Powe 1999 The relation between funding by the National Institutes of Health and the burden of disease. New England Journal of Medicine 340(24):1914-1915.

Grupp, H., and M. Mogee 2004 Indicators for national science and technology policy. Pp. 75-94 in H. Moed, W. Glanzel, and U. Schmooch, eds., Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Guetzkow, J., M. Lamont, and G. Mallard 2004 What is originality in the social sciences and the humanities? American Sociological Review 69:190-212.

Guston, D. 2000 Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Guston, D., and K. Keniston, eds. 1994 The Fragile Contract: University Science and the Federal Government. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hagstrom, W. 1965 The Scientific Community. New York: Basic Books.

Hall, B. 1996 The private and social rates of returns to research and development. Pp. 140-162 in B. Smith and C. Barfield, eds., Technology, R&D, and the Economy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution/American Enterprise Institute.

Hargens, L. 1987 Scholarly consensus and journal selection rates. American Sociological Review 53:174-196.

Hart, R. 1999 On the problem of Chinese science. Pp. 189-201 in M. Biagioli, ed., The Science Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.

Hatry, H. 1989 Determining the effectiveness of government services. Pp. 469-482 in J. Perry, ed., Handbook of Public Administration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Hawkley, L.C., C.M. Masi, J.D. Berry, and J.T. Cacioppo 2006 Loneliness is a unique predictor of age-related differences in systolic blood pressure. Psychology and Aging 21:152-164.

Henkel, M. 1999 The modernization of research evaluation: The case of the UK. Higher Education 38:105-122.

Hicks, D. 2004 The four literatures of social science. Pp. 473-495 in H. Moed, W. Glanzel, and U. Schmoch, eds., Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Hicks, D., H. Tomizawa, Y. Saitoh, and S. Kobayashi 2004 Bibliometric evaluation of federally funded research in the United States. Research Evaluation 13(2):76-86.

Hollingsworth, J.R. 2003 Research Organizations and Major Discoveries in Twentieth-Century Science: A Case Study of Excellence in Biomedical Research. (Paper P-02-003). Available: http://skylla.wz-berlin.de/pdf/2002/p02-003.pdf [accessed Nov. 2006].

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×

Hollingsworth, J.R., and E.J. Hollingsworth 2000 Major discoveries and biomedical research organizations: Perspectives on interdisciplinarity, nurturing leadership, and integrated structure and cultures. Pp. 215-244 in P. Weingart and N. Stehr, eds., Practising Interdisciplinarity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Hook, E., ed. 2002 Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Horan, J. 1996 The End of Science. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Howard, R.A., and J.E. Matheson, eds. 1989 The Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis. Menlo Park, CA: Strategic Decisions Group.

Hull, D.L. 1988 Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Illinois Institute of Technology 1968 Technology in Retrospective and Critical Events. (A research report prepared for the National Science Foundation under Contract NSF-C535). Chicago: Illinois Institute of Technology.

Industrial Research Institute 1999 Measuring and Improving the Performance and Return on R&D. Washington, DC: Industrial Research Institute.

Inkeles, A. 1986 Advances in sociology: A critique. Pp. 13-31 in K.W. Deutsch, A.S. Markovits, and J. Platt., eds., Advances in the Social Sciences: What, Who, Where, How? Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

Institute of Medicine 1991 Extending Life, Enhancing Life: A National Research Agenda on Aging. Committee on a National Research Agenda on Aging. E.T. Lonergan, ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

1998 Scientific Opportunities and Public Needs: Improving Priority Setting and Public Input at the National Institutes of Health. Committee on the NIH Research Priority-Setting Process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

2004 NIH Extramural Center Programs: Criteria for Initiation and Evaluation. Committee for Assessment of NIH Centers of Excellence Programs. Board on Health Sciences Policy. F.J. Manning, M. McGeary, and R. Estabrook, eds. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Irvine, J., and B.R. Martin 1984 Foresight in Science: Picking the Winners. London, England: Frances Pinter.

Jaeger, C.C., O. Renn, E.A. Rosa, and T. Webler 2001 Risk, Uncertainty and Rational Action. London, England: Earthscan.

Jaffe, A., and M. Trajtenberg 2002 Patents, Citations, and Innovations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Jaschik, S 2006 Anti-gay “flagging” at NEH? Inside Higher Ed, January 9. Available: http://insidehighered.com/news/2006/01/09/neh [accessed Nov. 2006].

Jones, E. 1988 Growth Recurring. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Juster, T.F., and R. Suzman 1995 An overview of the Health and Retirement Study. Journal of Human Resources (Suppl):S7-S56.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×

Keeney, R.L., and H. Raiffa 1976 Decision with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Khazaeli, A.A., and J.W. Curtsinger 2001 Genetic analysis of extended lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster. III. On the relationship between artificially selected lines and wild stocks. Genetica 109:245-253.

Klein, J.T. 1996 Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.

Kohler, R.E. 1987 Science, foundations, and American universities in the 1920s. Osiris 3:135-164.

1991 Partners in Science: Foundations and Natural Scientists, 1900-1945. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

2002 Landscapes and Labscapes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Kreilkamp, K. 1971 Hindsight and the real world of science policy. Science Studies 1:43-66.

Krige, J. 1980 Science, Revolution and Discontinuity. Brighton, England: Harvester Press.

Kuhn, T.S. 1962 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Laband, D., and M. Pietter 1994 The relative impacts of economic journals: 1970-1990. Journal of Economic Literature 32:640-666.

Lakdawalla, D.N., D.P. Goldman, J. Bhattacharya, M. Hurd, G. Joyce, and C. Panis 2003 Forecasting the nursing home population. Medical Care 41(1):8-20.

Lakdawalla, D.N., D.P. Goldman, and B.P. Shang 2005 The health and cost consequences of obesity among the future elderly. Health Affairs 24(Suppl):W5R30-W5R41.

Lamont, M. 2004 Theoretical growth and conceptual foreplay. Perspectives, Newsletter of the ASA Theory Section 27(3):8.

Lamont, M., and G. Mallard 2005 Peer Evaluation in the Social Sciences and the Humanities Compared: The United States, the United Kingdom, and France. Report prepared for the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, March 24.

Lamont, M., G. Mallard, and J. Guetzkow 2006 Beyond blind faith: Overcoming the obstacles to interdisciplinary evaluation. Research Evaluation 15(1):43-55.

Landry, R., M. Lamari, and N. Amara 2003 The extent and determinants of the utilization of university research in government agencies. Public Administration Review 63(2):192-205.

Langfeldt, L. 2001 The decision-making constraints and processes of grant peer review, and their effects on the review outcome. Social Studies of Science 31:820-841.

Latour, B., and S. Woolgar 1979 Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Laudel, G. 2006 Conclave in the tower of Babel: How peers review interdisciplinary research proposals. Research Evaluation 15(1):57-68.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×

Lee, R.D. 2003 Rethinking evolutionary theory of aging: Transfers, not births, shape senescence in social species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100:9637-9642.

Levy, B.R. 2003 Mind matters: Cognitive and physical effects of aging self-stereotypes. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences 58B(4):P203-P211.

Lindblom, C.E., and D.K. Cohen 1979 Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Link, A. 1996 Evaluating Public Sector Research and Development. New York: Praeger.

Losee, R. 1995 The development and migration of concepts from donor to borrower disciplines: Sublanguage term use in hard and soft sciences. Pp. 265-274 in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, June, Chicago, IL.

Loucks, E.B., L.F. Berkman, T.L. Gruenewald, and T.E. Seeman 2005 Social integration is associated with fibrinogen concentration in elderly men. Psychosomatic Medicine 67:353-358.

Lubitz, J., L. Cai, E. Kramarow, and H. Lentzner 2003 Health, life expectancy, and health care spending among the elderly. New England Journal of Medicine 349:1048-1055.

Lynn, L.E., ed. 1978 Knowledge and Policy: The Uncertain Connection. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

MacRae, D., Jr., and I. Feller 1998 The structure of and prospects for policy research as suggested by journal citation analysis. Policy Studies Review 15:115-135.

Mallard, G., M. Lamont, and J. Guetzkow 2005 Epistemological pluralism and fairness in peer evaluation: Evidence from the social sciences and the humanities. Submitted to American Journal of Sociology.

Mandel, H.G., and E.S. Vesell 2006 Declines in funding of NIH R01 research grants. Science 313:1387-1388.

Mansilla, V.B., and H. Gardner 2004 Assessing interdisciplinary work at the frontier: An empirical exploration of “symptoms of quality.” December 28. Available: http://www.interdisciplines.org/interdisciplinarity/papers/6/printable/paper [accessed Nov. 2006].

Manton, K.G., and X.L. Gu 2001 Changes in the prevalence of chronic disability in the United States black and non-black populations above age 65 from 1982 to 1999. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98:6354-6359.

Manton, K.G., and A.I. Yashin 2000 Mechanisms of Aging and Mortality: Searches for New Paradigms. (Monographs on Population Aging 7). Odense, Denmark: Odense University Press.

Marburger, J. 2005 Address to the 30th Annual AAAS Forum on Science and Technology Policy, April 21, Washington, DC. Available: http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2005/0421marburgerText.shtml [accessed Nov. 2006].

Martin, B. 1996 Technology foresight: Capturing the benefits from science-related technologies. Research Evaluation 6(2):158-168.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×

McKenna, M.T., C.M. Michaud, C.J.L. Murray, and J.S. Marks 2005 Assessing the burden of disease in the United States using disability-adjusted life-years. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 28(5):415-423.

Merton, R. 1965 On the Shoulders of Giants. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Moed, H., W. Glanzel, and U. Schmooch, eds. 2004 Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Monastersky, R. 2005 The number that’s devouring science. Chronicle of Higher Education, October 14. Available: http://chronicle.com/free/v52/i08/08a01201.htm [accessed Nov. 2006].

Morgan, M.G., and M. Henrion 1990 Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Morillo, F., M. Bordon, and I. Gomez 2001 An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics 51:203-222.

Mroczek, D., and A. Spiro 2003 Modelling intraindividual change in personality traits: Findings from the normative aging study. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences 58B(3):P153-P165.

Murphy, K., and R. Topel 1999 The economic value of medical research. Pp. 41-73 in K. Murphy and R. Topel, eds., Measuring the Gains from Medical Research. An Economic Approach. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Narin, F., K. Hamilton, and D. Olivastro 1997 The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public service. Research Policy 26(3):317-330.

Nasar, S. 1998 A Beautiful Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.

National Academy of Public Administration 1999 Remembering the Future: Applying Foresight Techniques to Research Planning at EPA. Washington, DC: National Academy of Public Administration.

National Academy of Sciences 1965 Basic research and national goals. A report to the U.S. Congress, House of Representatives, Committee on Science and Astronautics. Minerva (3)4:499.

National Institute on Aging 2001 Action Plan for Aging Research: Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2001-2005. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Aging. Available: http://www.nia.nih.gov/NR/rdonlyres/E6765778-B533-44BB-9774-1FB6821B1A14/2696/niasp.pdf [accessed Nov. 2006].

2005 Annual Data Report: Fiscal Year 2005. Available: http://www.nia.nih.gov/About-NIA/NACA/MeetingInformation [accessed Nov. 2006].

National Research Council 1972 Physics in Perspective: The Nature of Physics and the Subfields of Physics. Physics Survey Committee. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

1986 Behavioral and Social Sciences, Fifty Years of Discovery. Committee on Basic Research in the Behavioral and Social Sciences. N.J. Smelser and D.R. Gerstein, eds. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

1988 The Behavioral and Social Sciences: Achievements and Opportunities. Committee on Basic Research in the Behavioral and Social Sciences. D.R. Gerstein, R.D. Luce, N.J. Smelser, and S. Sperlich, eds. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×

1995a Allocating Federal Funds for Science and Technology. Committee on Criteria for Federal Support of Research and Development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

1995b Research Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change. Committee for the Study of Research–Doctorate Programs in the United States. M.L. Goldberger, B.A. Maher, and P. Ebert Flattau, eds. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

1996 Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Committee on Risk Characterization. P.C. Stern and H.V. Fineberg, eds. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

1997 Between Zeus and the Salmon: The Biodemography of Longevity. K.W. Wachter and C.E. Finch, eds. Committee on Population, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

1998 Trends in the Early Careers of Life Scientists. Committee on Dimensions, Causes, and Implications of Recent Trends in the Careers of Life Scientists. Board on Biology, Commission on Life Sciences, Office of Scientific and Engineering Personnel. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

1999 Making Climate Forecasts Matter. P.C. Stern and W.E. Easterling, eds. Panel on the Human Dimensions of Seasonal-to-Interannual Climate Variability, Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

2000a The Aging Mind: Opportunities in Cognitive Research. Committee on Future Directions for Cognitive Research on Aging. P.C. Stern and L.L. Carstensen, eds. Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

2000b Bridging Disciplines in the Brain, Behavioral, and Clinical Sciences. T.C. Pellmar and L. Eisenberg, eds. Committee on Building Bridges in the Brain, Behavioral, and Clinical Sciences. Division of Neuroscience and Behavioral Health. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

2001a Energy Research at DOE: Was it Worth it? Energy Efficiency and Fossil Energy Research, 1978 to 2000. Committee on Benefits of DOE R&D on Energy Efficiency and Fossil Energy, Board on Energy and Environmental Systems. Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

2001b Grand Challenges in Environmental Sciences. Committee on Grand Challenges in Environmental Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

2001c New Horizons in Health: An Integrative Approach. Committee on Future Directions for Behavioral and Social Sciences Research at the National Institutes of Health. B.H. Singer and C.D. Ryff, eds. Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

2001d Cells and Surveys: Should Biological Measures Be Included in Social Science Research? Committee on Population, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. C.E. Finch, J.W. Vaupel, and K. Kinsella, eds. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

2003 Assessing Research-Doctorate Programs: A Methodology Study. J.P. Ostriker and C.V. Kuh, eds. Assisted by J.A. Voytuk. Committee to Examine the Methodology for the Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs. Policy and Global Affairs Division Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

2005a Decision Making for the Environment: Social and Behavioral Science Research Priorities. Panel on Social and Behavioral Science Priorities for Environmental Decision Making, Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change. G.D. Brewer and P.C. Stern, eds. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×

2005b Prospective Evaluation of Applied Energy Research and Development at DOE (Phase One): A First Look Forward. Committee on Prospective Benefits of DOE’s Energy Efficiency and Fossil Energy R&D Programs. Board on Energy and Environmental Systems, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

2005c Thinking Strategically: The Appropriate Use of Metrics for the Climate Change Science Program. Committee on Metrics for Global Change Research. Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, Division on Earth and Life Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Science Board 2004 Science and Engineering Indicators. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

National Science Foundation Advisory Committee for GPRA Performance Assessment 2004 Report of the Advisory Committee for GPRA Performance Assessment. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf04216 [accessed Jan. 2007].

National Science and Technology Council 1996 Assessing Fundamental Science. Washington, DC: Office of the President.

Nelson, R. 1959 The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy 67(2):297-306.

Nelson, R., ed. 1993 National Innovation Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.

North, D.W., and O. Renn 2005 Decision Analytic Tools and Participatory Decision Processes. Paper prepared for the National Research Council Panel on Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making Workshop and Panel Meeting #3, February 3-5, Washington, DC.

Nye, M. J. 1993 From Chemical Philosophy to Theoretical Chemistry. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Oh, C.H. 1996 Linking Social Science Information to Policy Making. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Olsen, R., and D. Levy 2004 Program Performance and the President’s Budget: Do OMB’s PART Scores Really Matter? Paper presented at the Association for Policy Analysis and Management’s 2004 Annual Research Conference.

Olshansky, S.J., D.J. Passaro, R.C. Hershow, J. Layden, B.A. Carnes, J. Brody, L. Hayflick, R.N. Butler, D.B. Allison, and D.S. Ludwig 2005 A potential decline in life expectancy in the United States in the 21st century. New England Journal of Medicine 352(11):1138-1145.

Parsons, T. 1937 The Structure of Social Action: A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers. New York: McGraw-Hill.

1964 The Social System. New York: Free Press.

Perrin, B. 1998 Effective use and misuse of performance measurement. American Journal of Evaluation 19:367-379.

Pichler, R. 2006 The ERC and policy maker’s expectations: Evaluation as a change agent. Platform Special Edition, No. 28(April):3-10.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×

Pinkau, K., and O. Renn, eds. 1998 Environmental Standards: Scientific Foundations and Rational Procedures of Regulation with Emphasis on Radiological Risk Management. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Pletcher, S.D., and J.W. Curtsinger 2000a The influence of environmentally induced heterogeneity on age-specific genetic variance for mortality rates. Genetic Research 75:321-329.

Pletcher, S.D., and J.W. Curtsinger 2000b Why do lifespans differ? Partitioning mean longevity differences in terms of age-specific mortality parameters. Journal of Gerontology 55:B381-389.

Policy Research in Engineering, Science and Technology 2006 Evaluation of the United Kingdom Foresight Programme. Manchester, England: Manchester Business School, University of Manchester.

Porter, A., and F. Rossini 1985 Peer review of interdisciplinary research. Science, Technology and Human Values 10:33-38.

Power, M. 1997 The Audit Society. New York: Oxford University Press.

Preston, S.H. 2005 Deadweight? The influence of obesity on longevity (editorial). New England Journal of Medicine 352(11):1135-1137.

Price, D.J. De Solla 1963 Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.

Radin, B. 2000 The Government Performance and Results Act and the tradition of federal management reform: Square pegs in round holes? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10:111-135.

Raiffa, H. 1968 Decision Analysis: Introductory Lectures on Choices Under Uncertainty. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Rea, S.L., D. Wu, J.R. Cypser, J.W. Vaupel, and T.E. Johnson 2005 A stress-sensitive reporter predicts longevity in isogenic populations of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature Genetics 37:894-898.

Renn, O., T. Webler, and P. Wiedemann 1996 Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Rettig, R., J. Sorig, and B. Milward 1974 Criteria for the Allocation of Resources to Research and Development: A Review of the Literature. Report to the National Science Foundation.

Reuter, P., and J. Smith-Ready 2002 Editors’ note: Assessing JPAM after 20 Years. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21:339-353.

Reynolds, S.L., Y. Saito, and E.L. Crimmins 2005 The impact of obesity on active life expectancy in older American men and women. The Gerontologist 45(4):438-444.

Rhoades, G. 2002 Who’s doing it right? Strategic activity in public research universities. Review of Higher Education 24:41-66.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×

Rhoten, D. 2003 Multi-Method Analysis of the Social and Technical Conditions for Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Final report prepared for the National Science Foundation (NSF BCS-0129573). Available: http://www.hybridvigor.net/interdis/pubs/hv_pub_interdis-2003.09.29.pdf [accessed Nov. 2006].

Rinia, E.J., T.N. van Leeuwen, H.G. van Vuren, and A.F.J. van Raaij 2001 Influence on interdisciplinarity on peer-review and bibliometric evaluations in physics research. Research Policy 30:357-361.

Roco, M., and W. Bainbridge, eds. 2003 Nanotechnology: Societal Implications—Maximizing Benefits for Humanity. Report of the National Nanotechnology Initiative Workshop, December 2-3, 2003. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

Roessner, D. 2000 Quantitative and qualitative methods and measures in the evaluation of research. Research Evaluation 9:125-132.

Romsdahl, R.J. 2005 When do environmental decision makers use social science? Pp. 139-174 in National Research Council, Decision Making for the Environment: Social and Behavioral Science Research Priorities. Panel on Social and Behavioral Science Research Priorities for Environmental Decision Making, G.D. Brewer and P.C. Stern, eds. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Rooks, N.M. 2006 White Money/Black Power: The Surprising History of African American Studies and the Crisis of Race in Higher Education. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

Rosekranz, M.A., D.C. Jackson, K.M. Dalton, I. Dolsky, C.D. Ryff, B.S. Singer, D. Muller, N.H. Kalin, and R.J. Davidson 2003 Affective style and in vivo immune response: Neurobehavioral mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100:11148-11152.

Ross, D. 2003 Changing contours of the social science disciplines. Pp. 205-237 in T. Porter and D. Ross, eds., The Cambridge History of Science, Vol. 7. The Modern Social Sciences. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Ruegg, R., and I. Feller 2003 A Toolkit for Evaluating Public R&D Investment: Models, Methods, and Findings from ATP’s First Decade. (NIST GCR 03-857). Washington, DC: National Institute of Science and Technology.

Rule, J.B. 1997 Theory and Progress in Social Science. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Ruttan, V. 1982 Agricultural Research Policy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Scarpa, T. 2006 Peer review at NIH. Science 3111:41.

Scherer, F. 1965 Government research and development programs. Pp. 12-57 in R. Dorfman, ed., Measuring Benefits of Government Investments. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Seidman, H. 1998 Politics, Position, and Power, 5th ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Shapin, S. 1996 The Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×

Sherwin, C.W., and R. Isenson 1966 First Interim Report on Project Hindsight, Summary, 30 June 1966; revised 13 Oct. 1966, No. AD-642-4000, Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information, Springfield, VA.

Smelser, N.J. 1986 The Ogburn vision fifty years later. Pp. 21-34 in National Research Council, Behavioral and Social Sciences, Fifty Years of Discovery. Committee on Basic Research in the Behavioral and Social Sciences. N.J. Smelser and D.R. Gerstein, eds. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

2005 The questionable logic of “mistakes” in the dynamics of knowledge growth in the social sciences. Social Research 72:237-262.

Smith, B. 1982 The concept of scientific choice: A brief review of the literature. In Setting Priorities for Science, Hearings before the Subcommittee on Science, Research and Technology, Committee on Science and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives, Ninety-seventh Congress, Second Session, September 30; December 8, 1982, Appendix I.

1990 American Science Policy Since World War II. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Steinmetz, G., ed. 2005 The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Steinsaltz, D., S.N. Evans, and K.W. Wachter 2005 A generalized model of mutation-selection balance with applications to aging. Advances in Applied Mathematics 35:16-33.

Stent, G. 2002 Prematurity and uniqueness in scientific discovery. Pp. 22-33 in E. Hook, ed., Prematurity in Scientific Discovery. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Stephan, P., and S. Levin 1992 Striking the Mother Lode in Science. New York: Oxford University Press.

Stigler, S. 1993 Competition and the research universities. Daedalus 122(4):157-177.

1999 Statistical concepts in psychology. Pp. 189-199 in S. Stigler, ed., Statistics on the Table: The History of Statistical Concepts and Methods. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Stiglitz, J.E. 1988 Economics of the Public Sector, Second Edition. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.

Stokes, D. 1997 Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Suzman, R. 2004 Research on population aging at NIA: Retrospect and prospect. Pp. 239-264 in Aging, Health, and Public Policy: Demographic and Economic Perspectives. (Population and Development Review, a supplement to vol. 30). New York: Population Council.

Tan, Q., G. De Benedictis, A.I. Yashin, L. Bathum, L. Christiansen, J. Dahlgaard, N. Frizner, W. Vach, J.W. Vaupel, K. Christensen, and T.A. Kruse 2004 Assessing genetic association with human survival at multi-allelic loci. Biogerontology 4:89-97.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×

Thackray, A. 1978 Measurement in the historiography of science. Pp. 11-30 in Y. Elkana, J. Lederberg, R. Merton, A. Thackray, and H. Zuckerman, eds., Toward a Metric of Science. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Thomas, J. 1999 The Unpredictability of Science and Its Consequences. Presentation to the Royal Institution of Great Britain.

Toulmin, S. 1964 The complexity of scientific choice: A stocktaking. Minerva II (Spring, 3): 343-359.

Travis, G.D.L., and H.M. Collins 1991 New light on old boys: Cognitive and institutional particularism in the peer review system. Science, Technology, and Human Values 16:322-341.

U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment 1986 Research Funding as an Investment: Can We Measure the Returns? (OTA-TM-SET-36). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

1991 Federally Funded Research: Decisions for a Decade. (OTA-SET-490). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science 2004 Office of Science Strategic Plan, February 2004. Available: http://www.er.doe.gov/Sub/Mission/Strategic_Plan/Feb-2004-Strat-Plan-screen-res.pdf [accessed Dec.2006].

Van Asselt, M.B.A. 2000 Perspectives on Uncertainty and Risk: The Prima Approach to Decision Support. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

van Leeuwen, T. 2004 Descriptive versus evaluative bibliometrics. Pp. 375-388 in H. Moed, W. Glanzel, and U. Schmooch, eds., Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

van Leeuwen, T., and R. Tijssen 2000 Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: Analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows. Research Evaluation 9:183-186.

van Raan, A.F.J., ed. 1988a Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland.

van Raan, A.F.J. 1988b Introduction to the handbook. Pp. 1-xx in A.F. J. van Raan, ed., Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland.

2004a Measuring science. Pp. 19-50 In H. Moed, W. Glanzel, and U. Schmoch, eds., Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

2004b Sleeping beauties in science. Scientometrics 59:461-466.

2005 Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics 62:133-143.

Vaupel J.W., J.R. Carey, K. Christensen, T.E. Johnson, A.I. Yashin, N.V. Holm, I.A. Iachine, V. Kannisto, A.A. Khazaeli, P. Liedo, V.D. Longo, Y. Zeng, K.G. Manton, and J.W. Curtsinger 1998 Biodemographic trajectories of longevity. Science 280:855-860.

Vaupel, J.W., J.R. Carey, and K. Christensen 2003 It’s never too late. Science 301:1679-1681.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×

Vogel, G. 2004 European science: New commissioner calls for evolution, not revolution. Science 306:1459.

von Winterfeldt, D., and W. Edwards 1986 Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Wagner, C., and L. Leydesdorff 2005 Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science, Research Policy 34:1608-1618.

Waite, L. 2004 The demographic faces of the elderly. Population and Development Review 30 (Suppl):l-16.

Weinberg, A. 1963 Criteria for scientific choice. Minerva I(2):159-171.

1964 Criteria for scientific choice II: The two cultures. Minerva III(1):3-14.

1989 Criteria for evaluation, a generation later. Pp. 3-12 in D. Evered and S. Harnett, eds., The Evaluation of Scientific Research. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.

Weinberg, S. 2001 The non-revolution of Thomas Kuhn. Pp. 187-206 in S. Weinberg, ed., Facing Up: Science and Its Cultural Adversaries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Weingart, P. 2005 Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences. Scientometrics 62:117-131.

Weiss, C.H. 1977 Research for policy’s sake: The enlightenment function of social research. Policy Analysis 3(4):531-545.

1979 The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review 39(5):426-431.

Wen, M., K.A. Cagney, and N.A. Christakis 2005 Effect of specific aspects of community social environment on the mortality of individuals diagnosed with serious illness. Social Science and Medicine 61:1119-1134.

Wessely, S. 1996 What do we know about peer review? Psychological Medicine 26:883-886.

Wilmoth, J.R., L.J. Deegin, H. Lundström, and S. Horiuchi 2000 Increase of maximum life-span in Sweden, 1861-1999. Science 289:2366-2368.

Wolfe, A. 2005 Reality in political science. Chronicle of Higher Education (November 4):B19.

Wong, M.D., M.F. Schapiro, J. Boscardin, and S.U. Ettner 2002 Contributions of major diseases to disparities in mortality. New England Journal of Medicine 347:1585-1592.

Zeng, Y., and J.W. Vaupel 2003 Association of late childbearing with healthy longevity among the oldest-old in China. Population Studies 58(1):37-53.

Ziman, J. 1984 An Introduction to Science Studies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Zimmer, Z., A.I. Hermalin, and H. Lin 2002 Whose education counts? The added impact of adult-child relationships on physical functioning of older Taiwanese. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences 57B: S23-S32.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×

Zucker, L., and M. Darby 2005 Socio-Economic Impact of Nanoscale Science: Initial Results and NanoBank. (NBER Working Paper No. 11181). Available: http://www.nber.org/papers/W11181 [accessed Nov. 2006].

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×
Page 137
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×
Page 138
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×
Page 139
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×
Page 140
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×
Page 141
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×
Page 142
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×
Page 143
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×
Page 144
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×
Page 145
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×
Page 146
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×
Page 147
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×
Page 148
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×
Page 149
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×
Page 150
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×
Page 151
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×
Page 152
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×
Page 153
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×
Page 154
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×
Page 155
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11788.
×
Page 156
Next: Appendix: Biographical Sketches of Committee Members and Staff »
A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging Get This Book
×
 A Strategy for Assessing Science: Behavioral and Social Research on Aging
Buy Paperback | $48.00 Buy Ebook | $38.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

A Strategy for Assessing Science offers strategic advice on the perennial issue of assessing rates of progress in different scientific fields. It considers available knowledge about how science makes progress and examines a range of decision-making strategies for addressing key science policy concerns. These include avoiding undue conservatism that may arise from the influence of established disciplines; achieving rational, high-quality, accountable, and transparent decision processes; and establishing an appropriate balance of influence between scientific communities and agency science managers. A Strategy for Assessing Science identifies principles for setting priorities and specific recommendations for the context of behavioral and social research on aging.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!