. "5 The Frailty of Adaptive Hypotheses for the Origins of Organismal Complexity--MICHAEL LYNCH." In the Light of Evolution: Volume 1. Adaptation and Complex Design. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007.
The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
In the Light of Evolution, Volume I: Adaptation and Complex Design
hand, standard theory (Kimura, 1983) shows that the fixation probability of a mutation to A is es times that for a mutation to a, where S = 2 Ngs is twice the ratio of the power of selection to the power of random genetic drift (1/Ng). Because the population-level rate of transition from one allelic type to another is equal to the product of the mutation rate and the fixation rate, the ratio of probabilities of being in states A versus a at selection-mutation-drift equilibrium is simply mes (Fig. 5.1). This simple expression leads to two general conclusions: (i) regardless of the strength of selection, if 1/Ng >> |s| the population will be driven to a state expected under mutation pressure alone; and (ii) the equilibrium composition of a population depends not on the absolute power of mutation, but on the relative rates of forward and reverse mutations (the mutation bias).
FIGURE 5.1 The long-term probability that an allele residing at a biallelic locus will be of the selectively advantageous type, given a selective advantage s, an effective population number of gene copies of Ng, and a mutation rate to the beneficial allele m times that in the reverse direction. The lowest curve (2 Ngs = 0.0) denotes neutrality, whereas the upper line (2Ngs = ∞) denotes an effectively infinite population, such that genetic drift is a negligible force.