National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$61.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

Related Titles

topleft topright

Review of the Worker and Public Health Activities Program Administered by the Department of Energy and the Department of Health and Human Services (2006)
Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board (NRSB)
Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology (BEST)

Citation Manager

. "2 Scientific Program Assessment: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health." Review of the Worker and Public Health Activities Program Administered by the Department of Energy and the Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2006.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
64
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Review of the Worker and Public Health Activities Program Administered by the Department of Energy and the Department of Health and Human Services

individuals with a higher baseline risk of disease, because of inherited variation, also have higher excess risks from exposure. Similarly, genes found to confer sensitivity to high-dose radiation exposures, such as those now being evaluated in studies of second cancers following radiation therapy, should also be studied in people with protracted exposure to radiation at low-dose rates. The committee recommends that:

As these questions surface in the future, NIOSH and DOE explore the possibility of addressing them through studies that utilize DNA from DOE workers diagnosed with cancer and from controls. To facilitate these future studies DOE and NIOSH should consider the following:

  • Establishment of a database of workers with appropriate data to facilitate follow-up and to evaluate potential confounders (e.g., see recommendation 2);

  • Development of valid methods to identify non-cancer health outcomes including the use of periodic questionnaires, and specific diagnostic tests (e.g., pulmonary function); and

  • Support for the continuance of biorepositories such as that funded by ATSDR (Gunter 1997; NRC 2006b) that archive specimens such as blood and DNA to support future studies.

ANNEX 2A
NIOSH RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS

NIOSH provided independently (NIOSH 2005), and also in response to committee requests, information detailing the DOE-funded output of the NIOSH OERP program. In addition, the committee accessed the NIOSH OERP website,17 which is periodically updated with new publications that cite OERP funding. These sources also identified the material as intramural and extramural. That information was updated during the committee’s 10-month study period and is included in Table 2A-1 that follows. The table is based on information received from NIOSH May 9, 2006. NIOSH noted in responding to a committee information request that: “… the bibliography has been revised and updated to include all known publications that acknowledge whole or partial funding by DOE through the NIOSH Occupational Energy Research Program. This includes those studies funded directly by DOE between 1991 and 1993 but overseen by NIOSH under the OERP. Studies and literature that may relate to the OERP but did not acknowledge either DOE or NIOSH funding were not included. The committee should be aware that, for grants, there is no requirement that grantees report publications to NIOSH; therefore, we have identified many of these publications

Page
64